Meaningful Data Treatment from Multiple Physiological Sensors in a Cyber-Physical System

Once specific Smart Sensors are designed and manufactured in the newest nanoelectronics technology, and a Wireless Sensor Network is designed for being used on wearable applications (Cyber-Physical System) with optimum performance (data rate, power consumption, comfortability, etc.) the next step is the treatment applicable to the large amount of data collected. This can be a very general, and sometimes an unaffordable problem, but considering a system collecting physiological data from smart sensors on a human body, the range of possibilities is restricted to health or leisure but also to safety. In this case, a finite, and well-located, number of physiological sensors are producing few data per unit of time, which are locally processed for obtaining a reduced set of characteristics that are globally analyzed. In this paper, an analysis on different approaches for combining data from smart sensors attached to human body, with the purpose of determining the main emotion present in the person, is presented. Machine learning, selection of the best characteristics from raw sensor data, databases for system training, etc. are the key aspects in this problem. The conclusions of the analysis will help in the design of a new application, where emotion detection can be used for personal safety (domestic violence, sexual violence, bullying, etc.). Attention is paid on the locally and globally data processing in terms of hardware and software, together with low-power behavior.

[1]  D. Lykken,et al.  Correcting psychophysiological measures for individual differences in range. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Pedro M. Domingos A few useful things to know about machine learning , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[3]  Manfred Clynes,et al.  Sentics: The touch of emotions , 1977 .

[4]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  Toward Machine Emotional Intelligence: Analysis of Affective Physiological State , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[6]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[7]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[8]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Advances in wearable technology and its medical applications , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[9]  L. F. Barrett Are Emotions Natural Kinds? , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[10]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[11]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[12]  P. Lang The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[13]  Jennifer A. Healey,et al.  Wearable and automotive systems for affect recognition from physiology , 2000 .

[14]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  The HUMAINE Database , 2011 .

[15]  K. Scherer,et al.  The World of Emotions is not Two-Dimensional , 2007, Psychological science.

[16]  Francesco Corea,et al.  Introduction to Data , 2017, IBM SPSS Essentials.

[17]  Mohammad Soleymani,et al.  A Multimodal Database for Affect Recognition and Implicit Tagging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[18]  Thierry Pun,et al.  DEAP: A Database for Emotion Analysis ;Using Physiological Signals , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.