Presence and Flow in Virtual Environments: An Explorative Study

Virtual environments (VEs) are thought to elicit a sense of presence to the user. The sense of presence is considered as a psychological experience of being in a world generated by the computer instead of using the computer from the outside. As a field of research the psychology of VE is quite new and not well explored. In this study the three components of the sense of presence are examined: spatial awareness, attention and the realness of the VE. The three components solution of presence is accused of following Cartesian tradition in separating perception from action. Interaction is considered an important part of the experience of presence. Some authors consider it as the only determinant of presence. The purpose of this study was to explore empirically this human experience. The idea was to integrate the presented presence components into a cognitive-emotional appraisal process from the environment. This type of an appraisal process in generating emotions dominates the field of modern psychological emotion theories. It has also been presented that similar appraisal process precedes optimal experience, i.e., flow. Flow has been used as a metrics to evaluate human computer interaction. However, there are only few studies in which both presence and flow has been measured. In this study the participants gained experiences while conducting a simple search task in a virtual CAVEtm. These experiences were measured with a questionnaire. Based on the results a three-dimensional framework was constructed. This framework integrated the experience of presence and interaction as well as an appraisal process from the environment based on one’s skills and challenges provided by the environment. In the appraisal process also personal relevance and evaluation of the interactivity of the VE are included. Framework also included two basic emotional dimensions arousal and control, which are considered important in producing the overall emotional experience. The framework was used to explain different endpoint experiences gained by the users. The results showed that the sense of presence is an integral part of the flow experience in VEs and in order to experience VE positively a user should experience both presence and flow in VE. Although, the framework needs more careful studying, it provides a fair depiction of the basic dynamics behind a subjective experience in VE.

[1]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[2]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Real and Illusory Interactions Enhance Presence in Virtual Environments , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  FreemanJonathan,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire , 2001 .

[5]  Martijn J. Schuemie,et al.  Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  Mel Slater,et al.  Immersion, presence and performance in virtual environments: an experiment with tri-dimensional chess , 1996, VRST.

[7]  J. Russell,et al.  Concept of Emotion Viewed From a Prototype Perspective , 1984 .

[8]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[9]  Youshouzhai Gu Echo , 1980, The Craft of Poetry.

[10]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  A Revised Product Involvement Inventory: Improved Usability and Validity , 1992 .

[11]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Edwin H. Blake,et al.  Presence as a means for understanding user behaviour in virtual environments , 2000, South Afr. Comput. J..

[13]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[15]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[17]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[18]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Descartes, Heidegger, Gibson, and God: Toward an Eclectic Ontology of Presence , 1999, Presence.

[19]  R. Simons,et al.  Emotion processing in three systems: the medium and the message. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[20]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[21]  Tapio Takala,et al.  Visualization of Flow Data in Photo-realistic Virtual Environment , 2001 .

[22]  F. Massimini,et al.  The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience , 1988 .

[23]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Effects of Sensory Information and Prior Experience on Direct Subjective Ratings of Presence , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[25]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Small-Group Behavior in a Virtual and Real Environment: A Comparative Study , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[26]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Presence as Being-in-the-World , 1998, Presence.

[27]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life , 1997 .

[28]  R. Lazarus Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[29]  Janne Jalkanen,et al.  Building A Spatially Immersive Display: HUTCAVE , 2000 .

[30]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Telepresence via Television: Two Dimensions of Telepresence May Have Different Connections to Memory and Persuasion , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[31]  J. Freeman,et al.  Aroused and Immersed: The Psychophysiology of Presence , 2000 .

[32]  Gary Fontaine,et al.  The Experience of a Sense of Presence in Intercultural and International Encounters , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[33]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Embodied Presence in Virtual Environments , 1999, Visual Representations and Interpretations.

[34]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings , 1988 .

[35]  Mel Slater,et al.  Public Speaking in Virtual Reality: Facing an Audience of Avatars , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[36]  Thomas C. Meyer,et al.  Presence as the Defining Factor in a VR Application , 1994 .

[37]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[38]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[39]  Katerina Mania,et al.  The Effects of Levels of Immersion on Memory and Presence in Virtual Environments: A Reality Centered Approach , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[40]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[41]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  Immersive VR for Scientific Visualization: A Progress Report , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[42]  John M. Flach,et al.  The Reality of Experience: Gibson's Way , 1998, Presence.

[43]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[44]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  A Conceptual Model of the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[45]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human—Computer Interaction , 1994 .

[46]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Using Behavioral Realism to Estimate Presence: A Study of the Utility of Postural Responses to Motion Stimuli , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[47]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[48]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Measurement of presence and its consequences in virtual environments , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  William J. Havlena,et al.  The Varieties of Consumption Experience: Comparing Two Typologies of Emotion in Consumer Behavior , 1986 .

[50]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[51]  W. Wundt Outlines of Psychology , 1897 .

[52]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[53]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[54]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[55]  N. Alessi,et al.  Presence as an emotional experience. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[56]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments , 2000, SGCH.

[57]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  MEASURING PRESENCE: A LITERATURE-BASED APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDARDIZED PAPER-AND-PENCIL INSTRUMENT , 2000 .

[58]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Introduction to Part IV , 1988 .

[59]  J. Fodor,et al.  How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson's “ecological approach” , 1981, Cognition.

[60]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[61]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[62]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .