Development and Implementation of Computerized Clinical Guidelines: Barriers and Solutions

Research indicates that computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve clinical performance and patient outcomes, and yet CDSSs are not in widespread use. Physician guidelines, in general, face barriers in implementation. Guidelines in a computerized format can overcome some of the barriers to conventional text-form guidelines; however, computerized programs have novel aspects that have to be considered, aspects such as technical problems/support and user interface issues that can act as barriers. Though the literature points out that human, organizational, and technical issues can act as barriers in the implementation of CDSSs, studies clearly indicate that there are methods that can overcome these barriers and improve CDSS acceptance and use. These methods come from lessons learned from a variety of CDSS implementation ventures. Notably, most of the methods that improve acceptance and use of a CDSS require feedback and involvement of end-users. Measuring and addressing physician or user attitudes toward the computerized support system has been shown to be important in the successful implementation of a CDSS. This article discusses: 1) the barriers of implementation of guidelines in general and of CDSSs; 2) the importance of the physician's role in development, implementation, and adherence; 3) methods that can improve CDSS acceptance and use; and 4) the types of tools needed to obtain end-user feedback.

[1]  Reed M. Gardner,et al.  Research Paper: Evaluation of User Acceptance of a Clinical Expert system , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  William J. Doll,et al.  The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues , 1991 .

[3]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[4]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Perceptions of house officers who use physician order entry , 1999, AMIA.

[5]  R. Elson Clinical Practice Guidelines , 1997 .

[6]  Julie M. Fiskio,et al.  Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system , 1999, AMIA.

[7]  D. R. Dixon,et al.  The behavioral side of information technology , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  David Classen,et al.  Implementing Antibiotic Practice Guidelines through Computer-Assisted Decision Support: Clinical and Financial Outcomes , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Nick Freemantle,et al.  Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  Patrice Degoulet,et al.  Computer-Adjusted Dosage of Anticoagulant Therapy Improves the Quality of Anticoagulation , 1998, MedInfo.

[11]  Clement J. McDonald,et al.  Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior. , 1976 .

[12]  A Winter,et al.  Decision support in medicine: a survey of problems of user acceptance. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[13]  Fitzmaurice,et al.  Review of computerized decision support systems for oral anticoagulation management , 1998, British journal of haematology.

[14]  A. Taylor-Vaisey,et al.  Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  B. Kaplan,et al.  Culture counts: how institutional values affect computer use. , 2000, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[16]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[17]  G G Koch,et al.  The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. The case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. , 1996, Medical care.

[18]  S. Cretin,et al.  Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids. , 1997, JAMA.

[19]  J. Jespersen,et al.  Multicentre randomised study of computerised anticoagulant dosage , 1998, The Lancet.

[20]  D P Connelly,et al.  Computerized patient records in primary care. Their role in mediating guideline-driven physician behavior change. , 1995, Archives of family medicine.

[21]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[22]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. , 1999, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[23]  S Graeber Application of clinical workstations: functionality and usability. , 1997, Clinical performance and quality health care.

[24]  Diana E. Forsythe,et al.  Implementing computers in ambulatory care: implications of physician practice patterns for system design , 1997, AMIA.

[25]  Dissemination of information about the US Preventive Service Task Force guidelines. , 1994, Archives of family medicine.

[26]  T. Clemmer,et al.  A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Gary S. Nickell,et al.  The computer attitude scale , 1986 .

[28]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Review Paper: Managing Change: An Overview , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[29]  Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah,et al.  Exploring users' desire to be involved in computer systems development: An exploratory study , 1997 .

[30]  J Jousimaa,et al.  An implementation study of the PDRD primary care computerized guidelines. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[31]  M. Enkin,et al.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  F D Hobbs,et al.  A prospective controlled trial of computerized decision support for lipid management in primary care. , 1996, Family practice.

[33]  B. Arnetz,et al.  Technological stress: psychophysiological aspects of working with modern information technology. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[34]  Charles Young,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a computer-based physician workstation in an outpatient setting: implementation barriers to outcome evaluation. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[35]  R. C. Turner,et al.  Patient-carried card prompts vs computer-generated prompts to remind private practice physicians to perform health maintenance measures. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[36]  J S Pliskin,et al.  Computerized algorithms and pediatricians' management of common problems in a community clinic , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[37]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[38]  R. Gardner,et al.  Experience with a computerized interactive protocol system using HELP. , 1980, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[39]  Thomas H. Payne The transition to automated practitioner order entry in a teaching hospital: the VA Puget Sound experience , 1999, AMIA.

[40]  T. Massaro,et al.  Introducing Physician Order Entry at a Major Academic Medical Center: II. Impact on Medical Education , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[41]  S J Jay,et al.  Why Doctors Don't Use Computers: Some Empirical Findings , 1986, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[42]  Stephen M. Downs,et al.  Comparing user acceptance of a computer system in two pediatric offices: a qualitative study , 2000, AMIA.

[43]  Charles E. Downing,et al.  System usage behavior as a proxy for user satisfaction: an empirical investigation , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[44]  M Miralles,et al.  Assessing physician's expectations and attitudes toward hospital information systems. The IMASIS experience. , 1999, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[45]  W. Hammond,et al.  Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[46]  C. Chambers,et al.  Microcomputer-generated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[47]  Frank Sullivan,et al.  Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports , 1995, BMJ.

[48]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Changing physicians' practices. , 1993, Tobacco control.