Single-cell Digital Twins for Cancer Preclinical Investigation.

Laboratory models derived from clinical samples represent a solid platform in preclinical research for drug testing and investigation of disease mechanisms. The integration of these laboratory models with their digital counterparts (i.e., predictive mathematical models) allows to set up digital twins essential to fully exploit their potential to face the enormous molecular complexity of human organisms. In particular, due to the close integration of cell metabolism with all other cellular processes, any perturbation in cellular physiology typically reflect on altered cells metabolic profiling. In this regard, changes in metabolism have been shown, also in our laboratory, to drive a causal role in the emergence of cancer disease. Nevertheless, a unique metabolic program does not describe the altered metabolic profile of all tumour cells due to many causes from genetic variability to intratumour heterogeneous dependency on nutrients consumption and metabolism by multiple co-existing subclones. Currently, fluxomics approaches just match with the necessity of characterizing the overall flux distribution of cells within given samples, by disregarding possible heterogeneous behaviors. For the purpose of stratifying cancer heterogeneous subpopulations, quantification of fluxes at the single-cell level is needed. To this aim, we here present a new computational framework called single-cell Flux Balance Analysis (scFBA) that aims to set up digital metabolic twins in the perspective of being better exploited within a framework that makes also use of laboratory patient cell models. In particular, scFBA aims at integrating single-cell RNA-seq data within computational population models in order to depict a snapshot of the corresponding single-cell metabolic phenotypes at a given moment, together with an unsupervised identification of metabolic subpopulations.

[1]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Modelling cancer in microfluidic human organs-on-chips , 2019, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Integration of transcriptomic data and metabolic networks in cancer samples reveals highly significant prognostic power , 2018, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Chenguang Wang,et al.  Cancer cells metabolically "fertilize" the tumor microenvironment with hydrogen peroxide, driving the Warburg effect , 2011, Cell cycle.

[4]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Minoru Kanehisa,et al.  KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts , 2017, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[7]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Integration of single-cell RNA-seq data into population models to characterize cancer metabolism , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Charles Swanton,et al.  Translational Implications of Tumor Heterogeneity , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  Avlant Nilsson,et al.  Recon3D: A Resource Enabling A Three-Dimensional View of Gene Variation in Human Metabolism , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  J. Masters HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[12]  Neil Swainston,et al.  Recon 2.2: from reconstruction to model of human metabolism , 2016, Metabolomics.

[13]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  A metabolic core model elucidates how enhanced utilization of glucose and glutamine, with enhanced glutamine-dependent lactate production, promotes cancer cell growth: The WarburQ effect , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Systems Biology of Metabolism: A Driver for Developing Personalized and Precision Medicine. , 2017, Cell metabolism.

[15]  J. Locasale,et al.  The impact of cellular metabolism on chromatin dynamics and epigenetics , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  popFBA: tackling intratumour heterogeneity with Flux Balance Analysis , 2017, Bioinform..

[17]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Zooming-in on cancer metabolic rewiring with tissue specific constraint-based models , 2016, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[18]  N. McGranahan,et al.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution , 2013, Nature.

[19]  Adriano Angelucci,et al.  Tumor-stroma metabolic relationship based on lactate shuttle can sustain prostate cancer progression , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[20]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Reconstruction and Use of Microbial Metabolic Networks: the Core Escherichia coli Metabolic Model as an Educational Guide. , 2010, EcoSal Plus.

[21]  E. Giannoni,et al.  Reciprocal metabolic reprogramming through lactate shuttle coordinately influences tumor-stroma interplay. , 2012, Cancer research.

[22]  L. Fournel,et al.  Interconnection between Metabolism and Cell Cycle in Cancer. , 2019, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[23]  E. Birney,et al.  Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways , 2004, Nucleic Acids Research.

[24]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Constraint-Based Modeling and Simulation of Cell Populations , 2016, WIVACE.

[25]  Susumu Goto,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Cell plasticity and heterogeneity in cancer. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[27]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. , 2003, Metabolic engineering.

[28]  G. Sledge,et al.  Heterogeneity and cancer. , 2014, Oncology.

[29]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology Peer Review Process File Oncogenic K-ras Decouples Glucose and Glutamine Metabolism to Support Cancer Cell Growth Transaction Report , 2022 .

[30]  B. Palsson,et al.  A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction , 2010 .