Biomaterials and regenerative technologies used in bone regeneration in the craniomaxillofacial region: Consensus report of group 2 of the 15th European Workshop on Periodontology on Bone Regeneration.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS To review the regenerative technologies used in bone regeneration: bone grafts, barrier membranes, bioactive factors and cell therapies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Four background review publications served to elaborate this consensus report. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Biomaterials used as bone grafts must meet specific requirements: biocompatibility, porosity, osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, surface properties, biodegradability, mechanical properties, angiogenicity, handling and manufacturing processes. Currently used biomaterials have demonstrated advantages and limitations based on the fulfilment of these requirements. Similarly, membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) must fulfil specific properties and potential biological mechanisms to improve their clinical applicability. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have evaluated the added effect of bone morphogenetic proteins (mainly BMP-2) and autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) when used as bioactive agents to enhance bone regeneration. Three main approaches using cell therapies to enhance bone regeneration have been evaluated: (a) "minimally manipulated" whole tissue fractions; (b) ex vivo expanded "uncommitted" stem/progenitor cells; and (c) ex vivo expanded "committed" bone-/periosteum-derived cells. Based on the evidence from clinical trials, transplantation of cells, most commonly whole bone marrow aspirates (BMA) or bone marrow aspirate concentrations (BMAC), in combination with biomaterial scaffolds has demonstrated an additional effect in sinus augmentation and horizontal ridge augmentation, and comparable bone regeneration to autogenous bone in alveolar cleft repair.

[1]  Giuseppe Perale,et al.  Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  N. Donos,et al.  The use of bioactive factors to enhance bone regeneration: A narrative review. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  N. Pandis,et al.  Cell therapy for orofacial bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect? , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  H. KiernanCaoimhe,et al.  The Immune Response to Allogeneic Differentiated Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Context of Bone Tissue Engineering , 2017 .

[6]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Graft‐Free Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2017, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  David F. Williams,et al.  Biocompatibility Pathways: Biomaterials-Induced Sterile Inflammation, Mechanotransduction, and Principles of Biocompatibility Control. , 2017, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[8]  Wei Cao,et al.  Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: pathological and therapeutic implications , 2014, Nature Immunology.

[9]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Delivery of small molecules for bone regenerative engineering: preclinical studies and potential clinical applications. , 2014, Drug discovery today.

[10]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[11]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.