Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: a cross-institutional study

– This paper aims to investigate the extent to which social networking tools had an impact on academics’ patterns of informal scholarly communication in humanities and social science disciplines. Social networking tools, reinforced by proliferation and advances in portable computing and wireless technologies, have reshaped how information is produced, communicated and consumed. , – A cross-institutional quantitative study utilized an online questionnaire survey sent to 382 academics affiliated with humanities and social science disciplines in two different academic institutions: one that belongs to a Western tradition of scholarly communication in Ireland, and the other to a developing country in Oman. Descriptive interpretation of data compared findings from both universities. Frequencies, percentages and means were displayed in tables to enhance the meaning of collected data. Inferential analysis was also conducted to determine statistical significance. , – Overall findings indicate progressive use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. There is perceived usefulness on the impact of social networking tools on patterns of informal scholarly communication. However, nearly one-third of the respondents have never used social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Institution-based data comparison revealed no significant differences on data except for few activities of informal scholarly communication. , – Given that the number of study subjects was eventually small (total = 382) and that academics by their very nature are disinclined to respond to online surveys, results of the study may suggest non-response errors, and these may impact negatively on the acceptability of inferences and statistical conclusions. The results of the study are, therefore, unlikely to be useful for generalization, but they remain suggestive of a growing tendency among humanities and social sciences’ academics to use social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. , – Empirical findings provide a broad understanding about the potential of social networking tools on informal scholarly communication in areas of humanities and social sciences disciplines. Multi-disciplinary investigation and qualitative studies may further deepen our understanding of the impact of social networking tools on patterns of scholarly communication.

[1]  G. Kirkup.  Academic blogging: academic practice and academic identity , 2010 .

[2]  Nancy L. Maron,et al.  Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries. , 2008 .

[3]  Michael Perini,et al.  Potential of social networking sites for distance education student engagement , 2010 .

[4]  Youmei Liu,et al.  Social Media Tools as a Learning Resource , 2010 .

[5]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[6]  Khaiser Nikam,et al.  Moving from script to science 2.0 for scholarly communication , 2009, Webology.

[7]  Retta Guy,et al.  THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA FOR ACADEMIC PRACTICE: A REVIEW OF LITERATURE , 2012 .

[8]  B. Vickery.  Scientific Communication in History , 2000 .

[9]  Baiyun Chen,et al.  Investigating Instructional Strategies for Using Social Media in Formal and Informal Learning. , 2012 .

[10]  Michael Thomas,et al.  Using new social media and Web 2.0 technologies in business school teaching and learning , 2012 .

[11]  Erin Cassidy,et al.  Higher Education and Emerging Technologies: Student Usage, Preferences, and Lessons for Library Services , 2011 .

[12]  Nora Beatriz Molina.  The Scholarly Communication in the Science 2.0 Era , 2012 .

[13]  John L. Gresham.  From Invisible College to Cyberspace College: Computer Conferencing and the Transformation of Informal Scholarly Communication Networks. , 1994 .

[14]  Jean Poland,et al.  Informal Communication Among Scientists and Engineers , 1991 .

[15]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Invisible Colleges and Information Transfer a Review and Commentary with particular Reference to the Social Sciences , 1982, J. Documentation.

[16]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Using Twitter During an Academic Conference: The #iswc2009 Use-Case , 2010, ICWSM.

[17]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Jussi Okkonen,et al.  Refining information and knowledge by social media applications , 2012 .

[19]  Ellen Collins,et al.  Use and relevance of Web 2.0 resources for researchers , 2010, ELPUB.

[20]  M. Roblyer,et al.  Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[22]  R. Procter,et al.  Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[24]  Uwe Matzat,et al.  Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of social contacts? , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[25]  Ali Saif Al-Aufi,et al.  An investigation of digital scholarship and disciplinary culture in Oman , 2010, Libr. Hi Tech.

[26]  Diego Ponte,et al.  Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination , 2011 .

[27]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Microblogs in Higher Education - A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Funda Erzurum,et al.  Use of Social Networks as an Educational Tool , 2011 .

[29]  Anatoliy A. Gruzd,et al.  Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Social media use in the research workflow , 2011 .