Effects of Fractionation and Combinatorial Evaluation of Tamarindus indica Fractions for Antibacterial Activity

Six fractions, named TiA – TiF, were obtained by fractionating the crude ethanol extract of the stem bark of Tamarindus indica using column chromatographic techniques. On TLC, fraction TiB showed five bands, TiC three bands, while TiD and TiE showed two bands each. TiC, TiD and TiE were re-eluted with different solvent systems to yield two fractions each, while TiB yielded four. These subfractions were designated B1-B4; C1-C2; D1-D2 and E1-E2, respectively. Tannins, flavonoids and alkaloids, among other components, were detected, albeit in different proportions with respect to fractions and subfractions and were compartmentalized with respect to the solvent systems used. The in vitro antibacterial activity of fractions and subfractions was tested separately and in combinations using the agar well diffusion technique. The susceptibly of test strains (expressed as %) were: 83.3% (TiA and TiB), 75.0% (crude extract and TiC), 66.7% (TiD), 50.0% (TiE) and 16.7% (TiF) when used singly, whereas in combination, the corresponding susceptibilities were 100% (CE), 83.3% (DE), 66.7% (AB, AF, BC, BD, DE and EF), 50% (AC and CD), 33.3% (BE and BF) and 16.7% (AD) against Gram negative bacteria strains and 100% (EF), 80% (DE), 60% (AB, BC and CE), 40% (AC, BD, BF, CF and DF) and 20% (AE, AF, BE and CD) against Gram positive strains. Percentage susceptibility with combinatorial use of re-fractions ranged from 85.7–57.1% and 60–40% against Gram negative and positive strains (TiB subfractions), respectively, 100–85.7% and 40–0% against Gram negative and positive strains (TiC, TiD and TiE sub-fractions).

[1]  U. Nwodo,et al.  Studies on the antibacterial properties of the leaf extracts of Chromolaena odoratea L. King and Robinson (Asteraceae) , 2008 .

[2]  F. Al-Bayati Synergistic antibacterial activity between Thymus vulgaris and Pimpinella anisum essential oils and methanol extracts. , 2008, Journal of ethnopharmacology.

[3]  Daciana Ciocan,et al.  PLANT PRODUCTS AS ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS , 2007 .

[4]  K. Überla,et al.  In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of antiviral medicinal plants using a vector‐based assay technique , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[5]  Yong Chen,et al.  Inclusion complexes of azadirachtin with native and methylated cyclodextrins: solubilization and binding ability. , 2005, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[6]  Dong Liu,et al.  Bioassay-Guided Fractionation of Rubus suavissimus. Leaf Extracts Possessing NF-κ.B Inhibitory Activities and a Separable Cytotoxicity , 2005 .

[7]  S. Jassim,et al.  Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[8]  A. Okoli,et al.  Antibacterial activity of Harungana madagascariensis leaf extracts , 2002, Phytotherapy research : PTR.

[9]  J. Williams Review of antiviral and immunomodulating properties of plants of the Peruvian rainforest with a particular emphasis on Una de Gato and Sangre de Grado. , 2001, Alternative medicine review : a journal of clinical therapeutic.

[10]  G. Lucier,et al.  Medicinal herbs in the United States: research needs. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  M. Cheesbrough Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries , 1991 .

[12]  E. Bruck,et al.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. , 1980, Pediatrics.

[13]  J. Crush,et al.  I. Introduction and general methods , 1979 .

[14]  C. Iroegbu,et al.  In vitro antibacterial activity of Synclisa scabrida whole root extracts , 2005 .

[15]  I. Okeke,et al.  Socioeconomic and behavioral factors leading to acquired bacterial resistance to antibiotics in developing countries. , 1999, Emerging infectious diseases.

[16]  J. Harborne Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis , 1973 .