Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Using Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrodes in Third Trimester: Can We Obtain Additional Information Other than CTG Trace?

BACKGROUND Cardiotocography (CTG) is the most widely used procedure despite its low specificity for fetal acidosis and poor perinatal outcome. Fetal electrocardiography (fECG) with transabdominal electrodes is a new, non-invasive and promising method with greater potential for detecting impairment of fetal circulation. This study is the first that attempts to assess the usefulness of fECG in comparison to CTG during antepartum period. OBJECTIVES To determine if a single fECG examination along with CTG tracing and Doppler flow measurement in the fetal vessels has any additional clinical value in normal and intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) fetuses. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 93 pregnancies with IUGR, 37 pregnancies with IUGR and brain sparing effect, and 324 healthy pregnant women. The T/QRS ratio, cerebro-placental ratio (CRP), and CTG tracings were analyzed. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were applied. The relationship between results of the T/QRS ratio and CTG examination among the study groups was analyzed. RESULTS The highest average mean value of the T/QRS ratio was recorded in the IUGR group with a normal CPR and a pathologic CTG (0.235 ± 0.014). The highest average maximum values were observed in the groups of IUGR pregnancies with a reduced CPR with normal (0.309 ± 0.100), suspicious (0.330 ± 0.102) and pathologic (0.319 ± 0.056) CTGs. Analysis of variance revealed differences between study groups regarding maximum values and the difference between maximum and minimal values of T/QRS. Correlations between groups were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS Higher values of T/QRS ratio in IUGR pregnancies with normal and reduced CPR than in control group regardless of the result of CTG examination may indicate minimal worsening of intrauterine fetal well-being in growth retarded fetuses. No relationship between fECG examination and CTG tracings suggests that a single fECG does not provide any additional clinically significant information determining the condition of the fetus; however, further studies are required.

[1]  G. Macones,et al.  Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Intrauterine Growth Restriction , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part I: the randomized controlled trials , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  U. Hanson,et al.  Fetal monitoring with computerized ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2012, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  R. Bahado-Singh,et al.  The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  J. Nuovo,et al.  Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor. , 1999, American family physician.

[6]  K G Rosén,et al.  STAN--the Gothenburg model for fetal surveillance during labour by ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[7]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Application of spatio-temporal filtering to fetal electrocardiogram enhancement , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[8]  T. Fuchs Values of T/QRS ratios measured during normal and post-term pregnancies , 2014, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[9]  F. Arias Accuracy of the middle-cerebral-to-umbilical-artery resistance index ratio in the prediction of neonatal outcome in patients at high risk for fetal and neonatal complications. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Twenty‐five years after the FIGO guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring: Time for a simplified approach? , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  K. Greene,et al.  Changes in the ST waveform of the fetal lamb electrocardiogram with hypoxemia. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Relation of fetal blood gases and data from computer‐assisted analysis of fetal heart rate patterns in small for gestation fetuses , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  The Efficacy of Individual Computer Heart Rate Indices in Detecting Acidemia at Birth in Growth‐Restricted Fetuses , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  K. Rosen,et al.  Fetal ECG waveform analysis. , 2004, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[15]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Determination of fetal heart rate from abdominal signals: evaluation of beat-to-beat accuracy in relation to the direct fetal electrocardiogram , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[16]  Y. Ville,et al.  Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  J. Westgate,et al.  Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  I Kjellmer,et al.  Changes in the fetal heart rate and ECG during hypoxia. , 1975, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  N. Pattison,et al.  Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  E. Cosmi,et al.  Computerized cardiotocography in the management of intrauterine growth restriction associated with Doppler velocimetry alterations , 2004, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[21]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  A. Baschat,et al.  The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[23]  G. Clifford,et al.  A Review of Fetal ECG Signal Processing; Issues and Promising Directions. , 2010, The open pacing, electrophysiology & therapy journal.

[24]  M. C. Folli,et al.  Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  J. Westgate,et al.  ST waveform changes during repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  V. Berghella,et al.  ST Waveform Analysis versus Cardiotocography Alone for Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials , 2012, American Journal of Perinatology.

[27]  A. J The future of fetal monitoring. , 2012, Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology.