Theorising about the lifecycle of IT use: An appropriation perspective

This paper argues that theorising about the whole lifecycle of IT use is underdeveloped. Theories that explain one or more phases of lifecycle of IT use are discussed and critiqued and a candidate theory for understanding the whole lifecycle identified: the Model of Technology Appropriation (MTA). The MTA incorporates many of the strengths of the other models but has a shortcoming with respect to explaining the how and why of changes in patterns of use over the lifecycle. To address this weakness, theories of change are examined and incorporated with the MTA. It is argued that the resulting model provides a more complete description and explanation of the IT use lifecycle.

[1]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[2]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  More than just a communication system: diversity in the use of electronic mail , 1988, CSCW '88.

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Linda Stern,et al.  Influences on Continued Use of an Information System: A Longitudinal Study , 2008, ECIS.

[5]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  E-mail research: targeting the enterprise , 2005 .

[6]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  Diffusion - or delusion? Challenging an IS research tradition , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Negotiating ICT development and use: The case of a telemedicine system in the healthcare region of Crete , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[9]  Linda Stern,et al.  Plateaus in long-term appropriation of an information system , 2007 .

[10]  R. Wolfe ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS* , 1994 .

[11]  Nigel King,et al.  Innovation at Work: The Research Literature , 1990 .

[12]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[13]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[14]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Modifications and innovations to technology artifacts , 2007 .

[15]  C. Bauer,et al.  Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement—Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation , 2002 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[18]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  External variables, beliefs, attitudes and information technology usage behavior , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[21]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Dialectics of resilience: a multi-level analysis of a telehealth innovation , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Craig C. Lundberg,et al.  Social change in complex organizations , 1970 .

[24]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change , 2005 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Peter Roberts,et al.  Information technology acceptance in a sample of government employees: a test of the technology acceptance model , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  M. Pozzebon,et al.  The Influence of a Structurationist View on Strategic Management Research , 2004 .

[30]  J. Rose,et al.  The Double Dance of Agency : a socio-theoretic account of how machines and humans interact , 2005 .

[31]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[32]  S. Howard,et al.  A Field Study of Perceptions and Use of Mobile Telephones by 16 to 22 Year Olds , 2002 .

[33]  Jane Ogden,et al.  Some problems with social cognition models: a pragmatic and conceptual analysis. , 2003, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[34]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[35]  R. Kraut,et al.  Varieties of Social Influence: the Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium , 1998 .

[36]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Implementing routine and radical innovations , 1989 .

[37]  Gwo-Guang Lee,et al.  Effects of socio‐technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing , 2006 .

[38]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[39]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  A learning process in email use - a longitudinal case study of the interaction between organization and technology , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Steve Howard,et al.  From Adoption to Use: the process of appropriating a mobile phone , 2003, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Carol Pollard,et al.  Exploring Continued and Discontinued Use of IT: A Case Study of OptionFinder, a Group Support System , 2003 .

[42]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Kees Boersma,et al.  From means to ends: The transformation of ERP in a manufacturing company , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[45]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[46]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on "Quo Vadis TAM - Issues and Reflections on Technology Acceptance Research" , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  M. Treacy,et al.  Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research , 2015, DATB.

[49]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .

[50]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[51]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Implications of goal theories for the theories of reasoned action and planned behaviour , 2003 .

[52]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Explanation in Information Systems , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[53]  Simon M. Kaplan,et al.  Interpreting socio-technical co-evolution: Applying complex adaptive systems to IS engagement , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[54]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[55]  Jennie Carroll,et al.  Completing design in use: closing the appropriation cycle , 2004, ECIS.

[56]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[58]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks , 2008, MIS Q..

[59]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[60]  Hung-Pin Shih,et al.  Continued use of a Chinese online portal: an empirical study , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[61]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  From implementation to design: tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW , 1994, CSCW '94.

[62]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[63]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Diffusion theory and practice: Disseminating quality management and software process improvement innovations , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[64]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[65]  D. Leonard Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization , 2011 .

[66]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[67]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[68]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[69]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[71]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2016 .

[72]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[73]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[74]  Eric C. Turner,et al.  Innovation diffusion and technology acceptance: The case of PKI technology , 2006 .

[75]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[76]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Patterns of sharing customizable software , 1990, CSCW '90.

[77]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  An evaluation of a major validity threat to the technology acceptance model , 2001, ECIS.

[80]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[82]  J. Galaskiewicz,et al.  Organizations and Organization Theory. , 1984 .

[83]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[84]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[85]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Teams and technology Interactions over time , 2000 .

[86]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[87]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Looking Forward: Toward an Understanding of the Nature and Definition of IT Acceptance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[88]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[89]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Comment on Benbasat and Barki's "Quo Vadis TAM" article , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[90]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Users and customizable software : a co-adaptive phenomenon , 1990 .

[91]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[92]  Said S. Al-Gahtani,et al.  Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[93]  Steve Baron,et al.  Beyond Technology Acceptance: Understanding Consumer Practice , 2006 .

[94]  Linda Stern,et al.  Adoption, adaptation, stabilization and stagnation: Software appropriation over time , 2005 .

[95]  S. Howard,et al.  'No' to a free mobile: when adoption is not enough , 2002 .

[96]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[97]  Niall Hayes,et al.  Work-arounds and Boundary Crossing in a High Tech Optronics Company: The Role of Co-operative Workflow Technologies , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[98]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[99]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Technology use on the front line: how information technology enhances individual performance , 2007 .

[100]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Implementation, Innovation, and Related Themes Over The Years In Information Systems Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[101]  Leiser Silva,et al.  Post-positivist Review of Technology Acceptance Model , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[102]  Steve Howard,et al.  Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[103]  Joel Dinerstein,et al.  Technology and Its Discontents: On the Verge of the Posthuman , 2006 .

[104]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Explaining changes in learning and work practice following the adoption of online learning: a human agency perspective , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[105]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .