The Type A Structured Interview: A behavioral assessment in the rough

The Type A behavior pattern is the focus of considerable research in behavioral medicine because of its causal relevance to coronary heart disease. The primary assessment of Type A behavior is a global rating made from a structured interview. From the perspective of behavioral assessment, this Structured Interview (SI) is important for two reasons. First, it provides an example of the superiority of an observed behavioral measure compared to self-report questionnaires for the assessment of an overt behavior pattern. Second, it provides a unique opportunity for the application of behavioral assessment technology. However, while the SI has demonstrated its clinical and research utility as a diagnostic procedure, its usefulness could be further enhanced in the areas of treatment selection and evaluation. The historical relationship between behavior and coronary heart disease is described. The development of the SI and the strengths of this assessment relative to other measurement approaches are reviewed. The standard questions and administration procedures for the interview are presented, along with several variations and modifications. Following this overview, the SI is discussed from the perspective of behavioral assessment.

[1]  I. Waldron,et al.  Elements of the coronary prone behavior pattern in children and teen-agers. , 1976, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[2]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Replicability of rating the coronary-prone behaviour pattern. , 1968, British journal of preventive & social medicine.

[3]  M. Kornitzer,et al.  Two methods of assessing the type A coronary-prone behavior pattern in Belgium. , 1978, Journal of chronic diseases.

[4]  K. Menninger,et al.  Psychoanalytic observations in cardiac disorders , 1936 .

[5]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Development of an objective psychological test for the determination of the coronary-prone behavior pattern in employed men. , 1967, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  R. Rosenman,et al.  Coronary heart disease in the Western Collaborative Group Study , 1970 .

[7]  R. Brand,et al.  Multivariate prediction of coronary heart disease during 8.5 year follow-up in the Western Collaborative Group Study. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  M Feinleib,et al.  The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. I. Methods and risk factors. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  T. Ryan,et al.  Psychological correlates of coronary angiographic findings. , 1976, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  R. Rahe,et al.  Heritability of Type A Behavior , 1978, Psychosomatic medicine.

[11]  M Feinleib,et al.  The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham Study. III. Eight-year incidence of coronary heart disease. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  M Feinleib,et al.  The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. II. Prevalence of coronary heart disease. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  Thurstone temperament schedule , 1953 .

[14]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the Western Collaborative Group Study. , 1967, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  E. Friedman,et al.  Behavior Patterns and Serum Cholesterol in Two Groups of Normal Males , 1968, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[16]  F. Spencer,et al.  AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC FAILURE. , 1964, JAMA.

[17]  L. A. Conner THE PSYCHIC FACTOR IN CARDIAC DISORDERS , 1930 .

[18]  C. Jenkins,et al.  The prediction of immunity to coronary heart disease. , 1966, JAMA.

[19]  S J Zyzanski,et al.  Prediction of clinical coronary heart disease by a test for the coronary-prone behavior pattern. , 1974, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Melvin L. Snyder,et al.  Helplessness, stress level, and the coronary-prone behavior pattern , 1974 .

[21]  B. Caffrey Reliability and validity of personality and behavioral measures in a study of coronary heart disease. , 1968, Journal of chronic diseases.

[22]  T. Weiss Coronary Prone Behavior , 1978 .

[23]  H. Leventhal,et al.  Type A Assessment and Interaction in the Behavior Pattern Interview , 1977, Psychosomatic medicine.

[24]  Type A behaviour and coronary heart disease. , 1979 .

[25]  M. Friedman,et al.  The relationship of behavior pattern A to the state of the coronary vasculature. A study of fifty-one autopsy subjects. , 1968, The American journal of medicine.

[26]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Recurring and fatal myocardial infarction in the Western Collaborative Group Study. , 1967, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  B. Caffrey Behavior patterns and personality characteristics related to prevalence rates of coronary heart disease in American monks. , 1969, Journal of chronic diseases.

[28]  J. Blumenthal,et al.  Type A Behavior Pattern and Coronary Atherosclerosis , 1978, Circulation.

[29]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Coronary heart disease in the Western collaborative group study. A follow-up experience of two years. , 1966, JAMA.

[30]  M. Friedman,et al.  Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings; blood cholesterol level, blood clotting time, incidence of arcus senilis, and clinical coronary artery disease. , 1959, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[31]  T. Wolfe DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF CARDIOVASCULAR SYMPTOMATOLOGY , 1934 .

[32]  K. Matthews,et al.  Competitive drive, pattern A, and coronary heart disease: a further analysis of some data from the Western Collaborative Group Study. , 1977, Journal of chronic diseases.

[33]  R. Brand,et al.  Coronary heart disease in Western Collaborative Group Study. Final follow-up experience of 8 1/2 years. , 1975, JAMA.

[34]  I. Waldron The coronary-prone behavior pattern, blood pressure, employment and socio-economic status in women. , 1978, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[35]  M. Friedman,et al.  A Predictive Study of Coronary Heart Disease: The Western Collaborative Group Study , 1964 .

[36]  I. Stewart Coronary disease and modern stress. , 1951, Lancet.

[37]  R. W. Bortner,et al.  A short rating scale as a potential measure of pattern A behavior. , 1969, Journal of chronic diseases.

[38]  R. Keith,et al.  Coronary Heart Disease and Behavior Patterns: An Examination of Method , 1965, Psychosomatic medicine.

[39]  D. C. Glass Stress, behavior patterns, and coronary disease. , 1977, American scientist.

[40]  A. Sporn,et al.  Type A behavior pattern and coronary angiographic findings. , 1978, JAMA.

[41]  R. Brand,et al.  Multivariate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease in the Western Collaborative Group Study Compared to the Findings of the Framingham Study , 1976, Circulation.

[42]  M. Friedman,et al.  Association of Specific Behavior Pattern in Women with Blood and Cardiovascular Findings , 1961, Circulation.

[43]  R. Rosenman,et al.  The measurement of pattern A behavior. , 1967, Journal of chronic diseases.

[44]  K. Matthews,et al.  Caregiver-child interactions and the type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. , 1977, Child development.

[45]  B. Underwood,et al.  The Recency Principle in the Temporal Coding of Memories , 1978 .

[46]  R. Lushene,et al.  Interpersonal interaction and cardiovascular response in type A subjects and coronary patients. , 1979, Journal of human stress.