Influence of Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer on Pathological Complete Response and Long-Term Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Purpose: In breast cancer, a pathological complete response (pCR) has been described as generally resulting in a favorable prognosis. However, there are subgroups, such as patients with a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2,in which the effect of pCR on the prognosis is suspected to be weaker. Patients with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer may therefore react differently in relation to pCR and prognosis, and this is investigated in this study. Patients and Methods: Breast cancer patients were identified from a clinical breast cancer registry. The study subjects had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2001 to 2018 and their pathological and clinical information as well as medical family history were available. They were considered to have a positive family history if they had at least 1 first-degree relative with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to study the association between family history, pCR (ypT0; ypN0), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Of 1,480 patients, 228 (15.4%) had a positive family history. The pCR rates were 24.9% in all patients, and 24.4% and 27.6% in those without/with a family history, respectively. Family history was not associated with a higher pCR rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85–1.76; p = 0.27) or a different disease-free survival (DFS; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.15; 95% CI 0.88–1.52; p = 0.30). pCR did not affect the prognosis differently in relation to family history. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, family history was not associated with pCR and DFS. pCR improved survival, independently of family history.

[1]  M. Lux,et al.  Update Breast Cancer 2019 Part 3 – Current Developments in Early Breast Cancer: Review and Critical Assessment by an International Expert Panel , 2019, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[2]  M. Lux,et al.  Update Breast Cancer 2019 Part 1 – Implementation of Study Results of Novel Study Designs in Clinical Practice in Patients with Early Breast Cancer , 2019, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[3]  M. Bani,et al.  Prediction of pathological complete response and prognosis in patients with neoadjuvant treatment for triple-negative breast cancer , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[4]  M. Lux,et al.  Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) – Part 1 with Recommendations for the Screening, Diagnosis and Therapy of Breast Cancer , 2018, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[5]  Tanja Fehm,et al.  BRCA1/2 Mutations and Bevacizumab in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: Response and Prognosis Results in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From the GeparQuinto Study. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Bani,et al.  BRCA mutations and their influence on pathological complete response and prognosis in a clinical cohort of neoadjuvantly treated breast cancer patients , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  M. Lux,et al.  Risk, Prediction and Prevention of Hereditary Breast Cancer – Large-Scale Genomic Studies in Times of Big and Smart Data , 2018, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[8]  J. Lubiński,et al.  Predictors of survival for breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 mutation , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  A. Yang,et al.  Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene mutations and breast cancer outcomes , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[10]  M. Lux,et al.  Update Breast Cancer 2018 (Part 1) – Primary Breast Cancer and Biomarkers , 2018, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[11]  David Evans,et al.  Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Yafei Qi,et al.  Network Meta‐Analysis on the Effects of DNA Damage Response‐Related Gene Mutations on Overall Survival of Breast Cancer Based on TCGA Database , 2017, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[13]  P. Fasching,et al.  Germline Mutation Status, Pathological Complete Response, and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the GeparSixto Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[14]  Robert Huether,et al.  Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[15]  Jing-ping Yuan,et al.  The association between prognosis of breast cancer and first-degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Familial Cancer.

[16]  O. Olopade,et al.  Effect of BRCA germline mutations on breast cancer prognosis , 2016, Medicine.

[17]  M. Papa,et al.  Neo-adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  A. Jakubowska,et al.  Clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer and a PALB2 mutation: a prospective cohort analysis. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  F. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Worse Breast Cancer Prognosis of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: What's the Evidence? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  Brigitte Rack,et al.  Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Wei-Ting Hwang,et al.  Effects of BRCA1- and BRCA2-Related Mutations on Ovarian and Breast Cancer Survival: A Meta-analysis , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  R. Schulz-Wendtland,et al.  Pooled analysis of the prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor status in five German cohort studies , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[24]  T. Rebbeck,et al.  Modifiers of cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  M. Papa,et al.  Does pathologic complete response predict for outcome in BRCA mutation carriers with triple-negative breast cancer? , 2014 .

[26]  M. Beckmann,et al.  HER2 and TOP2A amplification in a hospital-based cohort of breast cancer patients: associations with patient and tumor characteristics , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[27]  Kenneth Offit,et al.  Two Decades After BRCA: Setting Paradigms in Personalized Cancer Care and Prevention , 2014, Science.

[28]  R. Wiśniowski,et al.  Survival from breast cancer in patients with CHEK2 mutations , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  M. Bani,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk - From Genetics to Molecular Understanding of Pathogenesis. , 2013, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[30]  J. Lubiński,et al.  Ten-year survival in patients with BRCA1-negative and BRCA1-positive breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Wei Lu,et al.  Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al.  Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[33]  J. Hopper,et al.  Abstract P4-13-10: DoBRCA1andBRCA2mutation carriers have an earlier natural menopause than their non-carrier relatives: A study from the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium For Research Into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab).: , 2012 .

[34]  S. Cross,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al.  The role of genetic breast cancer susceptibility variants as prognostic factors. , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[36]  M Uder,et al.  Percent Mammographic Density and Dense Area as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer. , 2012, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[37]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Peter A Fasching,et al.  Ki67, chemotherapy response, and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[39]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  M. Bani,et al.  Quality Assured Health Care in Certified Breast Centers and Improvement of the Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients , 2011, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[41]  G. Mills,et al.  Incidence and Outcome of BRCA Mutations in Unselected Patients with Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[42]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[43]  M. Federico,et al.  Favourable ten-year overall survival in a Caucasian population with high probability of hereditary breast cancer , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[44]  R. Gelber,et al.  Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009 , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[45]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Relationship between obesity and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among women with operable breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  Ofra Barnett-Griness,et al.  Clinical outcomes of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  John L Hopper,et al.  Breast cancer prognosis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an International Prospective Breast Cancer Family Registry population-based cohort study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  P. Fasching,et al.  Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.