The Generality of Strength Adaptation

The generality of strength suggests that a “strong” individual will typically exhibit higher values of strength across a wide range of strength tasks for a given muscle relative to their weaker counterpart. This concept is often extended to adaptation, suggesting that increasing strength on a given movement or strength task with a given muscle should reflect an increase in other movements or tasks using that same muscle. The concept of a generality of strength adaptation appears less supported in the literature. Objective: To elaborate on recommendations for strength assessment, providing a focus on the “generality of strength” and the “generality of strength adaptation.” Design & Methods: We reviewed the literature on a generality of strength. In addition, we examined the resistance training literature to provide evidence and discussion on a generality of strength adaptation. Results/Conclusions: The generality of strength adaptation, even across strength skills using the same muscle on related movements seems quite low. Although some studies show a weak generality of strength adaptation and others show no generality of strength adaptation, it appears that increases in strength diminish as the strength assessment becomes farther removed from the actual training stimulus. (Journal of Trainology 2019;8:5-8)

[1]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[2]  T. Abe,et al.  Muscle Adaptations to High-Load Training and Very Low-Load Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[3]  T. Abe,et al.  Low-Load Bench Press Training to Fatigue Results in Muscle Hypertrophy Similar to High-Load Bench Press Training , 2013 .

[4]  L. E. Morehouse,et al.  Effect of static and dynamic exercises on muscular strength and hypertrophy. , 1957, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  A. Paoli,et al.  Isokinetic Dynamometry and 1RM Tests Produce Conflicting Results for Assessing Alterations in Muscle Strength , 2017, Journal of human kinetics.

[6]  P. J. Marín,et al.  Low intensity blood flow restriction training: a meta-analysis , 2012, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[7]  Stuart M Phillips,et al.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. , 2012, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  W. Zhu,et al.  A calcineurin-dependent transcriptional pathway controls skeletal muscle fiber type. , 1998, Genes & development.

[9]  Philip J. Rasch Notes: Relationship between Maximum Isometric Tension and Maximum Isotonic Elbow Flexion , 1957 .

[10]  D. Allen,et al.  Changes of myoplasmic calcium concentration during fatigue in single mouse muscle fibers , 1991, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  R. Orrell,et al.  Effects of resistance training on myosin function studied by the in vitro motility assay in young and older men. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  J. Fisher,et al.  A randomized trial to consider the effect of Romanian deadlift exercise on the development of lumbar extension strength. , 2013, Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine.

[13]  J. Loenneke,et al.  Practicing the Test Produces Strength Equivalent to Higher Volume Training , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  D. Sale,et al.  Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  Steven K. Baker,et al.  Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training-mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men , 2016, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  A J Sargeant,et al.  Strength training and power output: transference effects in the human quadriceps muscle. , 1986, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  T. Abe,et al.  Resistance training induced changes in strength and specific force at the fiber and whole muscle level: a meta-analysis , 2018, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[18]  T. Moritani,et al.  Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. , 1979, American journal of physical medicine.

[19]  Takashi Abe,et al.  Muscle adaptations following 21 consecutive days of strength test familiarization compared with traditional training , 2017, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  J. Fisher,et al.  Heavier and lighter load resistance training to momentary failure produce similar increases in strength with differing degrees of discomfort , 2017, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  J. Ward,et al.  THE DIFFERENCE IN RESPONSE OF THE QUADRICEPS AND THE BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLES TO ISOMETRIC AND ISOTONIC EXERCISE. , 1964, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  Relationship between Maximum Isometric Tension and Breaking Strength of Forearm Flexors , 1960 .

[23]  P. J. Marín,et al.  Muscular adaptations after two different volumes of blood flow‐restricted training , 2013, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[24]  J. Loenneke,et al.  Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement , 2017, Sports Medicine.

[25]  J. Fisher,et al.  Heavier- and lighter-load isolated lumbar extension resistance training produce similar strength increases, but different perceptual responses, in healthy males and females , 2018, PeerJ.