Rigidity of superdense coding

The famous superdense coding protocol of Bennett and Wiesner demonstrates that it is possible to communicate two bits of classical information by sending only one qubit and using a shared EPR pair. Our first result is that an arbitrary protocol for achieving this task (where there are no assumptions on the sender's encoding operations or the dimension of the shared entangled state) are locally equivalent to the canonical Bennett-Wiesner protocol. In other words, the superdense coding task is rigid. In particular, we show that the sender and receiver only use additional entanglement (beyond the EPR pair) as a source of classical randomness. We then explore whether higher-dimensional superdense coding, where the goal is to communicate one of $d^2$ possible messages by sending a $d$-dimensional quantum state, is rigid for all $d \geq 2$. We conjecture that $d$-dimensional superdense coding is rigid up to the choice of orthogonal unitary bases, and present concrete constructions of inequivalent unitary bases for all $d > 2$. Finally, we analyze the performance of superdense coding protocols where the encoding operators are independently sampled from the Haar measure on the unitary group. Our analysis involves bounding the distinguishability of random maximally entangled states, which may be of independent interest.

[1]  Zhidong Bai,et al.  LARGE SAMPLE COVARIANCE MATRICES WITHOUT INDEPENDENCE STRUCTURES IN COLUMNS , 2008 .

[2]  Andreas Klappenecker,et al.  Unitary Error Bases: Constructions, Equivalence, and Applications , 2003, AAECC.

[3]  R. Cleve,et al.  Quantum fingerprinting. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[4]  Ivan vSupi'c,et al.  Self-testing of quantum systems: a review , 2019, Quantum.

[5]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[6]  R. Werner All teleportation and dense coding schemes , 2000, quant-ph/0003070.

[7]  R. Werner,et al.  Why two qubits are special , 1999, quant-ph/9910064.

[8]  Pavel Yaskov A short proof of the Marchenko–Pastur theorem , 2016 .

[9]  Jamie Vicary,et al.  Quantum Latin squares and unitary error bases , 2015, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[10]  Elizabeth Meckes,et al.  The Random Matrix Theory of the Classical Compact Groups , 2019 .

[11]  Jon Tyson Two-sided estimates of minimum-error distinguishability of mixed quantum states via generalized Holevo–Curlander bounds , 2009, 0907.2094.

[12]  Vicenta Sánchez,et al.  A real-space renormalization approach to the Kubo–Greenwood formula in mirror Fibonacci systems , 2006 .

[13]  Roman Vershynin,et al.  High-Dimensional Probability , 2018 .

[14]  Ashley Montanaro On the Distinguishability of Random Quantum States , 2007 .

[15]  R. Schumann Quantum Information Theory , 2000, quant-ph/0010060.

[16]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[17]  O. Papaspiliopoulos High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science , 2020 .

[18]  A. S. Kholevo On Asymptotically Optimal Hypothesis Testing in Quantum Statistics , 1979 .

[19]  Z. Bai,et al.  Convergence Rate of Expected Spectral Distributions of Large Random Matrices. Part II. Sample Covariance Matrices , 1993 .

[20]  John Watrous,et al.  The Theory of Quantum Information , 2018 .