Quiet Comfort: Noise, Otherness, and the Mobile Production of Personal Space

Marketing, news reports, and reviews of Bose QuietComfort noise-canceling headphones position them as essential gear for the mobile rational actor of the neoliberal market—the business traveler. This article concerns noise-canceling headphones’ utility as soundscaping devices, which render a sense of personal space by mediating sound. The airplane and airport are paradoxical spaces in which the pursuit of freedom impedes its own enjoyment. Rather than fight the discomforts of air travel as a systemic problem, travelers use the tactic of soundscaping to suppress the perceived presence of others. Attention to soundscaping enables the scholar to explore relationships between media, space, freedom, otherness, and selfhood in an era characterized by neoliberalism and increased mobility. Air travel is a moment in which people with diverse backgrounds, beliefs, and bodies crowd together in unusually close proximity. Noise is the sound of individualism and difference in conflict. Noise is othered sound, and like any type of othering, the perception of noise is socially constructed and situated in hierarchies of race, class, age, and gender. The normative QuietComfort user in media representations is white, male, rational, monied, and mobile; women, children, and “chatty” passengers are cast as noisemakers. Moreover, in putting on noise-canceling headphones, diverse selves put on the historically Western subjectivity that has been built into their technology, one that suppresses the noise of difference in favor of the smooth circulation of people, information, and commodities.

[1]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman , 1997 .

[2]  J. Sterne.  The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction , 2003 .

[3]  Rayvon Fouché,et al.  Say It Loud, I'm Black and I'm Proud: African Americans, American Artifactual Culture, and Black Vernacular Technological Creativity , 2006 .

[4]  M. Foucault,et al.  Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault , 1988 .

[5]  Ilana Gershon.  “Neoliberal Agency” , 2011, Current Anthropology.

[6]  A. Tyler.  The Accidental Tourist , 1985 .

[7]  Patricia Mellencamp,et al.  Logics of Television: Essays in Cultural Criticism , 1990 .

[8]  Emily Thompson,et al.  The soundscape of modernity: Architectural acoustics and the culture of listening in America, 1900–1933 , 2007 .

[9]  Michael Bull,et al.  Sound Moves: iPod Culture and Urban Experience , 2008 .

[10]  Henri Lefebvre.  The production of space , 1992 .

[11]  R. Kline.  :The Soundscape of Modernity: Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America, 1900–1933 , 2003 .

[12]  S. Sassen.  Whose City Is It? Globalization and the Formation of New Claims , 1996, Cities and Citizenship.

[13]  Simon Sheikh.  The Production of Space , 1996 .

[14]  Lisa Nakamura.  Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet , 2007 .

[15]  Antoine Hennion,et al.  An Intermediary Between Production and Consumption: The Producer of Popular Music , 1989 .

[16]  B. Langer,et al.  The Practice of Everyday Life , 2019, Forms of Thinking in Leopardi’s Zibaldone.

[17]  J. Sterne.  Sounds Like the Mall of America: Programmed Music and the Architectonics of Commercial Space , 1997 .

[18]  L. Salter,et al.  Spaces Speak, Are You Listening?: Experiencing Aural Architecture , 2006 .

[19]  K. Keightley.  ‘Turn it down!’ she shrieked: gender, domestic space, and high fidelity, 1948–59 , 1996, Popular Music.

[20]  R. M. Schafer,et al.  The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World , 1993 .

[21]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  Sound Studies , 2004 .

[22]  Friedrich A. Kittler,et al.  Gramophone, Film, Typewriter , 1999 .

[23]  L. Manovich,et al.  The language of new media , 2001 .