District nursing workforce planning: a review of the methods.

District nursing services in Northern Ireland face increasing demands and challenges which may be responded to by effective and efficient workforce planning and development. The aim of this paper is to critically analyse district nursing workforce planning and development methods, in an attempt to find a suitable method for Northern Ireland. A systematic analysis of the literature reveals four methods: professional judgement; population-based health needs; caseload analysis and dependency-acuity. Each method has strengths and weaknesses. Professional judgement offers a 'belt and braces' approach but lacks sensitivity to fluctuating patient numbers. Population-based health needs methods develop staffing algorithms that reflect deprivation and geographical spread, but are poorly understood by district nurses. Caseload analysis promotes equitable workloads but poorly performing district nursing localities may continue if benchmarking processes only consider local data. Dependency-acuity methods provide a means of equalizing and prioritizing workload but are prone to district nurses overstating factors in patient dependency or understating carers' capability. In summary a mixed method approach is advocated to evaluate and adjust the size and mix of district nursing teams using empirically determined patient dependency and activity-based variables based on the population's health needs.

[1]  K. Hurst Primary Care Trust Workforce Planning and Development: Hurst/Primary , 2008 .

[2]  Trudy Reynolds,et al.  Innovation and change: shaping district nursing services to meet the needs of primary health care. , 2006, Journal of nursing management.

[3]  Melissa Baldwin The Warrington workload tool: determining its use in one trust. , 2006, British journal of community nursing.

[4]  Hugh McKenna,et al.  Community nursing: health professional and public perceptions. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  M. Edwards,et al.  Is the district nursing service in a position to deliver intermediate care? A national survey of district nursing provision , 2003, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[6]  C. Goodman,et al.  A portrait of district nursing: its contribution to primary health care , 2003, Journal of interprofessional care.

[7]  R. Carr-Hill,et al.  Changes, challenges and choices for the primary health care workforce: looking to the future. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  R. Reading,et al.  An assessment of need for health visiting in general practice populations. , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.

[9]  S. Jenkins-Clarke,et al.  Skill mix between nurses and doctors working in primary care-delegation or allocation: a review of the literature. , 2000, International journal of nursing studies.

[10]  L. Goldstone,et al.  But who will make the visits? A patient-related information system for management in district nursing , 2000 .

[11]  M Hughes,et al.  Nursing workload: an unquantifiable entity. , 1999, Journal of nursing management.

[12]  R. Carr-Hill,et al.  Measurement systems in principle and in practice: the example of nursing workload. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[13]  J. Zerwekh The practice of empowerment and coercion by expert public health nurses. , 1992, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[14]  A. Jarvis,et al.  Referral criteria: making the district nursing service visible. , 2006, British journal of community nursing.

[15]  My N Tran,et al.  Take benchmarking to the next level. , 2003, Nursing management.