Stimulus‐contrast‐induced biases in activation order reveal interaction between V1/V2 and human MT+

The luminance contrast of a visual stimulus is known to modulate the response properties of areas V1 and the human MT complex (hMT+), but has not been shown to modulate interactions between these two areas. We examined the direction of information transfer between V1/V2 and hMT+ at different stimulus contrasts by measuring magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to moving and stationary stimuli presented centrally or peripherally. To determine the direction of information flow, the different response latencies among stimuli and hemispheres in V1/V2 was compared with those of hMT+. At high contrast, responses to stimulus motion and position began in V1/V2, and were followed in hMT+ with a delay between 34 and 55 ms. However, at low contrast, lateralized responses in hMT+ came first, with those in V1/V2 lagging with a delay of 27 ms. Also, at high contrast, stationary stimuli produced greater responses than motion stimuli in V1/V2, while the reverse was true in hMT+, whose response lagged behind the initial response in V1/V2. The same activation order was found using Mutual Information Analysis of the response variances for each condition. Here, the response variances in hMT+ mimicked and trailed those of V1/V2 at high contrast, whereas the reverse was true at low contrast. Such consistent interactions found using two different methodologies strongly supports a processing link between these two areas. The results also suggest that feedback from hMT+ for low‐contrast stimuli compensates for unresolved processing in V1/V2 when the input of a visual image is weak. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Fox,et al.  Intersubject variability of functional areas in the human visual cortex , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[3]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R A Andersen,et al.  The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  Huafu Chen,et al.  A Study on Asymmetry of Spatial Visual Field by Analysis of the fMRI BOLD Response , 2004, Brain Topography.

[6]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[8]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and function of visual area MT. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces , 2006, NeuroImage.

[11]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  Local precision of visuotopic organization in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Human V5 demonstrated by magnetoencephalography using random dot kinematograms of different coherence levels , 2003, Neuroscience Research.

[14]  A. A. Ioannides,et al.  Single-trial variability in early visual neuromagnetic responses: an explorative study based on the regional activation contributing to the N70m peak , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  G. Orban,et al.  Motion-responsive regions of the human brain , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  G Westheimer,et al.  Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  E. Niedertneyer Quantitative and topological EEG and MEG analysis , 1996 .

[23]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem , 1990 .

[24]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  A. A. Ioannides,et al.  Estimates of Brain Activity Using Magnetic Field Tomography and Large Scale Communication within the Brain , 1994 .

[26]  Koji Inui,et al.  Temporal analysis of the flow from V1 to the extrastriate cortex in humans. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Daniel Yoshor,et al.  Receptive fields in human visual cortex mapped with surface electrodes. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[29]  N. Laskaris,et al.  Semantic geodesic maps: a unifying geometrical approach for studying the structure and dynamics of single trial evoked responses , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[31]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  John G. Taylor,et al.  Mathematical analysis of lead field expansions , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  P A Salin,et al.  Response selectivity of neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey during reversible inactivation of area V1. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[35]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[36]  M. Kuba,et al.  Properties of visual evoked potentials to onset of movement on a television screen , 1990, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  R. Andersen,et al.  A Computational Framework for Determining Stereo Correspondence from a Set of Linear Spatial Filters Perception of Three-dimensional Structure from Motion Review , 2022 .

[40]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  The Upward Bias in Measures of Information Derived from Limited Data Samples , 1995, Neural Computation.

[42]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. III. Modeling , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Early (N70m) Neuromagnetic Signal Topography and Striate and Extrastriate Generators Following Pattern Onset Quadrant Stimulation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[44]  S. Zeki,et al.  Human area V5 and motion in the ipsilateral visual field , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[45]  A. Cowey,et al.  Striate cortex (V1) activity gates awareness of motion , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[47]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[48]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[49]  R. Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[50]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[52]  D. Geselowitz,et al.  Model studies of the magnetocardiogram. , 1973, Biophysical journal.

[53]  K Cheng,et al.  Human cortical regions activated by wide-field visual motion: an H2(15)O PET study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  A. Sillito,et al.  Always returning: feedback and sensory processing in visual cortex and thalamus , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[57]  S. Zeki,et al.  The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[58]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[59]  C. Walsh,et al.  Molecular approaches to brain asymmetry and handedness , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[60]  R. Hari,et al.  Stronger occipital cortical activation to lower than upper visual field stimuli Neuromagnetic recordings , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Speed-Dependent Responses in V5: A Replication Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[62]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[64]  Andreas A. Ioannides Magnetic Field Tomography: theory, applications and examples from the visual system , 2002 .