Carbon management: Evidence from case studies of German firms under the EU ETS

This paper examines the management practices of German firms with obligations under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) based on six structured in-depth interviews with managers of firms from different industries and based on survey data. The paper sheds light on management and trading practices, abatement behaviour, and the impact of the EU ETS on long-term decisions, such as investment decisions or innovative capacity. The aim is to provide information on firm-internal management processes related to the EU ETS and to strengthen intuition for microeconomic consequences of greenhouse gas regulation in a cap-and-trade scheme. The analysis reveals that management practices in the EU ETS are mainly driven by emission levels, firm size, pre-existing management structures and production patterns. While larger emitters (about 100,000 tCO2 per year or larger) are perfectly capable to carry out all relevant tasks, smaller emitters behave more passively due to transaction costs and lower expected return of transactions. Our analysis suggests that institutional responds to regulation should be taken into account for the design of greenhouse gas regulation.

[1]  J. Jaraitė,et al.  Firm Trading Behaviour and Transaction Costs in the European Union’s Emission Trading System: An Empirical Assessment , 2012 .

[2]  Philip Peck,et al.  Interaction of the EU ETS and national climate policy instruments – Impact on biomass use , 2012 .

[3]  Ulrich Oberndorfer,et al.  Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme : An empirical assessment for Germany , 2008 .

[4]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[5]  H. Rubin,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data , 1995 .

[6]  F. Convery,et al.  Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland , 2010 .

[7]  C. Perthuis,et al.  Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme , 2010 .

[8]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[9]  Jane Butterfield,et al.  EPS, ETS, Renewable obligations and feed in tariffs — Critical reflections on the compatibility of different instruments to combat climate change , 2011 .

[10]  J. Nazroo,et al.  Designing fieldwork strategies and materials , 2003 .

[11]  Daniel C. Matisoff.  Making Cap-and-Trade Work: Lessons from the European Union Experience , 2010 .

[12]  Malte Schneider,et al.  The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System — Findings of company case studies in the German power sector , 2011 .

[13]  Péter Heindl.  Transaction Costs and Tradable Permits: Empirical Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , 2012 .

[14]  B. Solomon.  New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of new institutional economics , 1999 .

[15]  Chukwumerije Okereke,et al.  An Exploration of Motivations, Drivers and Barriers to Carbon Management:: The UK FTSE 100 , 2007 .

[16]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  The relevance of process emissions for carbon leakage: A comparison of unilateral climate policy options with and without border carbon adjustment , 2012 .

[17]  P. Chisnall.  Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data , 1996 .

[18]  A. Löschel,et al.  KfW/ZEW CO2 Panel: Vermeiden oder kaufen – Deutsche Unternehmen im Emissionshandel , 2010 .

[19]  Christian Egenhofer,et al.  The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme:: Status, Prospects and Implications for Business , 2007 .

[20]  H. Koschel,et al.  KfW/ZEW CO2 Barometer 2010: Effizienzpotenziale des Emissionshandels noch nicht ausgeschöpft – Strategien und Management deutscher Unternehmen , 2010 .

[21]  Anita Engels,et al.  The European Emissions Trading Scheme: An exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon☆ , 2009 .

[22]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  EU ETS and Investment Decisions:: The Case of the German Electricity Industry , 2007 .

[23]  Gabriela Schaad,et al.  Does EU ETS lead to emission reductions through trade? The case of the Swedish emissions trading sector participants , 2009 .

[24]  F. André,et al.  Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis , 2009 .

[25]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect , 2010 .