Use of a nonpledgeted suture technique is safe and efficient for aortic valve replacement.

[1]  N. Jaussaud,et al.  Risk of reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis dysfunction. , 2009, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[2]  H. Schaff,et al.  Importance of implant technique on risk of major paravalvular leak (PVL) after St. Jude mechanical heart valve replacement: a report from the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT). , 2005, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  G W Cran,et al.  Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  P. Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  Natural history of early aortic paraprosthetic regurgitation: a five-year follow-up. , 1999, American heart journal.

[5]  D. Miller,et al.  Reoperation for aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: identification of patients at risk and results of operation. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[6]  G. Venn,et al.  Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement. , 1991, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  W. Aronow,et al.  Prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by Doppler echocardiography and its association with echocardiographic and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and physical signs of aortic stenosis in elderly patients. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  N. Kouchoukos,et al.  Factors associated with periprosthetic leakage following primary mitral valve replacement: with special consideration of the suture technique. , 1983, The Annals of thoracic surgery.