Research, part of a Special Feature on Understanding Adaptive Capacity in Forest Governance Local Consequences of Applying International Norms: Differences in the Application of Forest Certification in Northern Sweden, Northern Finland, and Northwest Russia

Forest certification, developed in the early 1990s, is a process in which independent assessors grant use of the certification label to producers who meet certain environmental and social criteria set for their forest products. This label was quickly seen to offer a market advantage and to signal corporate social and environmental responsibility. This paper focuses on international norms pertaining to environmental and indigenous rights, as manifested in cases of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)- and Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC)-compatible certification, and how these norms have been applied domestically and perceived locally in different states. Case studies are drawn from northern Sweden, northern Finland, and three regions in northwest Russia. The studies illustrate that the choice and implementation of certification type depend considerably on national infrastructure and market characteristics and result in substantial differences in the impact that international norms have at the local level.

[1]  Jakob Donner-Amnell.  Politics of Forests: Northern Forest-industrial Regimes in the Age of Globalization , 2004 .

[2]  Abraham L. Newman,et al.  Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union , 2008 .

[3]  R. Schlaepfer,et al.  The advocacy coalition framework: application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden , 2001 .

[4]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making Authority , 2002 .

[5]  J. Mcnichol.  Contesting Governance in the Global Marketplace: A Sociological Assessment of British Efforts to Build New Markets for NGO-Certified Sustainable Wood Products , 2000 .

[6]  Andrew P. Cortell,et al.  Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda , 2000 .

[7]  M. Tysiachniouk,et al.  The potential for ecological modernisation in Russia: scenarios from the forest industry , 2008 .

[8]  Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders’ rhetoric in Finland , 2003 .

[9]  P. Leskinen,et al.  Forestry Organization Network in Northern Finland , 2003 .

[10]  L. Gulbrandsen.  Sustainable Forestry in Sweden: The Effect of Competition Among Private Certification Schemes , 2005 .

[11]  C. Ochoa.  Advancing the Language of Human Rights in a Global Economic Order: An Analysis of a Discourse , 2005 .

[12]  Tetsuhiko Yoshimura,et al.  Strategies, functions and benefits of forest certification in wood products marketing: Perspectives of Finnish suppliers , 2006 .

[13]  Mark Rickenbach,et al.  Forest certification and institutional governance: An empirical study of forest stewardship council certificate holders in the United States , 2005 .

[14]  M. Tysiachniouk,et al.  Co-managing the Taiga: Russian Forests and the Challenge of International Environmentalism , 2004 .

[15]  L. Gulbrandsen.  Overlapping Public and Private Governance: Can Forest Certification Fill the Gaps in the Global Forest Regime? , 2004, Global Environmental Politics.

[16]  M. Tysiachniouk.  Forest Certification in Russia , 2006 .

[17]  Amy Gurowitz.  Mobilizing International Norms: Domestic Actors, Immigrants, and the Japanese State , 1999, World Politics.

[18]  Joseph V. Rees,et al.  Industry Self‐Regulation: An Institutional Perspective , 1997 .

[19]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Confronting Sustainability: Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries , 2006 .

[20]  L. Gulbrandsen.  Creating markets for eco‐labelling: are consumers insignificant? , 2006 .

[21]  B. Smit,et al.  Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability , 2006 .

[22]  J. R. Nielsen,et al.  Fisheries Co-Management - An Institutional Innovation. Perspectives and Challenges Ahead , 2002 .

[23]  D. Payne,et al.  The Globalization of Human Rights and the Socialization of Human Rights Norms , 2007 .

[24]  B. Cashore,et al.  Revising Theories of Nonstate Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance: Lessons from the Finnish Forest Certification Experience , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[25]  D. Humphreys.  Redefining the Issues: NGO Influence on International Forest Negotiations , 2004, Global Environmental Politics.

[26]  M. Finnemore,et al.  International Norm Dynamics and Political Change , 1998, International Organization.