Accounting for both local aquatic community composition and bioavailability in setting site-specific quality standards for zinc

Recent years have seen considerable improvement in water quality standards (QS) for metals by taking account of the effect of local water chemistry conditions on their bioavailability. We describe preliminary efforts to further refine water quality standards, by taking account of the composition of the local ecological community (the ultimate protection objective) in addition to bioavailability. Relevance of QS to the local ecological community is critical as it is important to minimise instances where quality classification using QS does not reconcile with a quality classification based on an assessment of the composition of the local ecology (e.g. using benthic macroinvertebrate quality assessment metrics such as River InVertebrate Prediction and Classification System (RIVPACS)), particularly where ecology is assessed to be at good or better status, whilst chemical quality is determined to be failing relevant standards. The alternative approach outlined here describes a method to derive a site-specific species sensitivity distribution (SSD) based on the ecological community which is expected to be present at the site in the absence of anthropogenic pressures (reference conditions). The method combines a conventional laboratory ecotoxicity dataset normalised for bioavailability with field measurements of the response of benthic macroinvertebrate abundance to chemical exposure. Site-specific QSref are then derived from the 5%ile of this SSD. Using this method, site QSref have been derived for zinc in an area impacted by historic mining activities. Application of QSref can result in greater agreement between chemical and ecological metrics of environmental quality compared with the use of either conventional (QScon) or bioavailability-based QS (QSbio). In addition to zinc, the approach is likely to be applicable to other metals and possibly other types of chemical stressors (e.g. pesticides). However, the methodology for deriving site-specific targets requires additional development and validation before they can be robustly applied during surface water classification.

[1]  John Davy-Bowker,et al.  Estimates and comparisons of the effects of sampling variation using 'national' macroinvertebrate sampling protocols on the precision of metrics used to assess ecological status , 2006 .

[2]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Deriving sediment quality guidelines from field-based species sensitivity distributions. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  E. Mager,et al.  Multi-linear regression analysis, preliminary biotic ligand modeling, and cross species comparison of the effects of water chemistry on chronic lead toxicity in invertebrates. , 2012, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[4]  Kenneth M Y Leung,et al.  Deriving site‐specific sediment quality guidelines for Hong Kong marine environments using field‐based species sensitivity distributions , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  W. Clements,et al.  Benthic invertebrate metals exposure, accumulation, and community‐level effects downstream from a hard‐rock mine site , 1999 .

[6]  W. Stubblefield,et al.  Cross-species extrapolation of chronic nickel Biotic Ligand Models. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Multigeneration acclimation of Daphnia magna Straus to different bioavailable copper concentrations. , 2005, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[8]  G. K. Pagenkopf.  Gill surface interaction model for trace-metal toxicity to fishes: role of complexation, pH, and water hardness , 1983 .

[9]  E. Tipping.  Humic Ion-Binding Model VI: An Improved Description of the Interactions of Protons and Metal Ions with Humic Substances , 1998 .

[10]  W. Clements,et al.  Effects of Metals on Stream Macroinvertebrate Assemblages from Different Altitudes , 1996 .

[11]  Daniel Zitomer,et al.  Sequential environments for enhanced biotransformation of aqueous contaminants , 1993 .

[12]  It Istituto Superiore di Sanit,et al.  Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document on euthrophication assessment in the context of European water policies. (Technical report 2009-030; Guidance document 23) , 2009 .

[13]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  The biotic ligand model: a historical overview. , 2002, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[14]  G. Suter,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology , 2001 .

[15]  Olivier Klepper,et al.  Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as a basis for comparison of ecotoxicological risks between substances and regions , 1998 .

[16]  K. D. De Schamphelaere,et al.  Environmental risk assessment of zinc in European freshwaters: a critical appraisal. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  E. Tipping.  WHAM—a chemical equilibrium model and computer code for waters, sediments, and soils incorporating a discrete site/electrostatic model of ion-binding by humic substances , 1994 .

[18]  D. DeForest,et al.  The sensitivity of aquatic insects to divalent metals: a comparative analysis of laboratory and field data. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  C. Wood,et al.  Biotic ligand model, a flexible tool for developing site-specific water quality guidelines for metals. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  W. Clements,et al.  Using biodynamic models to reconcile differences between laboratory toxicity tests and field biomonitoring with aquatic insects. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  L. Maltby,et al.  The lethal and sublethal responses of gammarus pulex to stress: Sensitivity and sources of variation in an in situ bioassay , 1991 .

[22]  D. Carlisle,et al.  Sensitivity and variability of metrics used in biological assessments of running waters , 1999 .

[23]  R. Playle.  Modelling metal interactions at fish gills , 1998 .

[24]  P. Paquin,et al.  Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 2. Application to acute copper toxicity in freshwater fish and Daphnia , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[25]  Christopher W. Hickey,et al.  Effects of heavy metals on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in New Zealand streams , 1998 .

[26]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers , 2003 .

[27]  C. Mebane,et al.  Acute toxicity of cadmium, lead, zinc, and their mixtures to stream‐resident fish and invertebrates , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.