A Holistic Approach for Understanding Project Management

Companies invest significant sums of money in major Information Technology IT projects, yet success remains limited. Despite an abundance of IT Project Management ITPM resources available to project teams, such as the Project Management Institute PMI Body of Knowledge, IT standards and IT governance, a large percentage of IT projects continue to fail and ultimately get scrapped. Recent studies have shown an average of 66% IT project failure rate, with 52% of the projects being cancelled, and 82% being delivered late. The purpose of this research was to provide a way for uncovering potential causes of IT project failures by utilizing a systemic and holistic approach to identify critical success factors for project management. The holistic approach has enabled the development of an ITPM conceptual model, which provides a method to evaluate the critical success factors of a given project, and their alignment with each other. The adoption of the systemic methodology and its implementation increase the potential for IT project success, and alert project leaders of potential problems throughout the life of the project.

[1]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Process and content: two ways of using SSM , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Ran Wang,et al.  The value of trust in knowledge sharing , 2003 .

[3]  Rick Kazman,et al.  BITAM: An engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures , 2005, Sci. Comput. Program..

[4]  P. Harmon.  Business Process Change: A Guide for Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals , 2007 .

[5]  J. Haynes,et al.  Inquiring Organizations: Moving From Knowledge Management To Wisdom , 2005 .

[6]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[7]  Pamela L. Alreck,et al.  The Survey Research Handbook , 1984 .

[8]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers , 2003 .

[9]  Gerold Riempp,et al.  The Effects of a KM Strategy on KM Performance in Professional Services Firms , 2011, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  Dynamic Models for Knowledge-Driven Organizations , 2012 .

[11]  Meliha Handzic,et al.  Knowledge Miner: Assisting in Pattern Discovery and Prediction , 2007 .

[12]  R. Müller,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  Lynne P. Cooper,et al.  Learning about the Organization via Knowledge Management: The Case of JPL , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  Mark Ives.  Identifying the Contextual Elements of Project Management within Organizations and their Impact on Project Success , 2005 .

[16]  Debbie B. Tesch,et al.  Project Management Learning: What the Literature Has to Say , 2003 .

[17]  R. S. Stainton,et al.  Applicable systems thinking , 1984 .

[18]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Mark Leach,et al.  Theory Testing Using Case Studies in Business-to-Business Research , 1999 .

[20]  Zbigniew Mikolajuk.  Community-Based Development of Knowledge Products , 2011, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[21]  R.N. Charette,et al.  Why software fails [software failure] , 2005, IEEE Spectrum.

[22]  Eliezer Kantorowitz,et al.  Use-case components for interactive information systems , 2005, Sci. Comput. Program..

[23]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking , 1993 .

[24]  Joyce Fortune,et al.  Current practice in project management — an empirical study , 2002 .

[25]  P. Checkland,et al.  Reflecting on SSM: The dividing line between ‘real world’ and ‘systems thinking world’ , 1996 .

[26]  Peerasit Patanakul,et al.  Standardized project management may increase development projects success , 2005 .