Applications of machine learning methods to identifying and predicting building retrofit opportunities

Abstract Building energy conservation measures (ECMs) can significantly lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from urban areas; however, uncertainties regarding not only ECM eligibility, but also associated costs and energy savings have slowed adoption of ECMs. To encourage ECM implementation, local governments have implemented a range of policies designed to increase the available information on building energy use. Energy audit mandates, such as New York City (NYC)’s Local Law 87 (LL87), require energy consultants to analyze installed building systems and provide building stakeholders with cost effective ECM recommendations on a multi-year cycle. However, complete audits are costly and time consuming. To accelerate ECM implementation, policymakers are exploring ways to utilize available data to target ECMs across a city’s entire building stock. In this study, energy audit data for over 1100 buildings in NYC, submitted in compliance with LL87, are analyzed to identify opportunities for ECMs across building system categories (e.g. distribution system, domestic hot water, etc.). A machine learning classifier, specifically a user-facing falling rule list (FRL) classifier based on binary features derived from LL87 data, is developed here to predict ECM eligibility given a specific set of building characteristics. Overall, the trained FRL classifier performs well (ROC AUC 0.72–0.86) for predicting cooling system, distribution system, domestic hot water, fuel switching, lighting, and motors ECM opportunities, which represent a majority of the auditor-recommended ECMs in the sample. Additionally, linear decision lists developed by the model allow building stakeholders to easily conduct streamlined audits of building systems and identify possible ECM opportunities by limiting input to the most relevant factors and prioritizing likely retrofit candidates. The implications of this work are significant in accelerating the adoption of building ECMs and catalyzing energy use and GHG emissions reductions from buildings.

[1]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Cities lead the way in climate–change action , 2010, Nature.

[2]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[3]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Energy usage and technical potential for energy saving measures in the Swedish residential building stock , 2013 .

[4]  Claude-Alain Roulet,et al.  Elaboration of retrofit scenarios , 2002 .

[5]  Constantine E. Kontokosta.  Energy disclosure, market behavior, and the building data ecosystem , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Jae-Weon Jeong,et al.  Estimating thermal performance and energy saving potential of residential buildings using utility bills , 2016 .

[7]  Constantine Kontokosta.  A Market-Specific Methodology for a Commercial Building Energy Performance Index , 2015 .

[8]  Todd Gerarden,et al.  Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: results from a survey of home energy auditors , 2011 .

[9]  J. C. Lam,et al.  Building energy audits and site surveys , 1995 .

[10]  R. Villoria-Siegert,et al.  Cost-availability curves for hierarchical implementation of residential energy-efficiency measures , 2015 .

[11]  David Hsu,et al.  How much information disclosure of building energy performance is necessary , 2014 .

[12]  Alberto Hernandez Neto,et al.  Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption , 2008 .

[13]  Christian Borgelt,et al.  Frequent item set mining , 2012, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[14]  Constantine Kontokosta,et al.  Predicting Building Energy Efficiency Using New York City Benchmarking Data , 2012 .

[15]  S. Corgnati,et al.  Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: the experience of TABULA Project , 2014 .

[16]  Mohammad S. Al-Homoud,et al.  Parametric analysis of alternative energy conservation measures in an office building in hot and humid climate , 2007 .

[17]  Michael D. Sohn,et al.  Big-data for building energy performance: Lessons from assembling a very large national database of building energy use , 2015 .

[18]  Viv Bewick,et al.  Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves , 2004, Critical care.

[19]  BorgeltChristian.  Frequent item set mining , 2012 .

[20]  Kirsten Engelund Thomsen,et al.  Energy Saving Potential in Retrofitting of Non-Residential Buildings in Denmark , 2015 .

[21]  Tobias Fleiter,et al.  Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany , 2012 .

[22]  V. Ismet Ugursal,et al.  Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: A review of modeling techniques , 2009 .

[23]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[24]  S. Gamtessa,et al.  An explanation of residential energy-efficiency retrofit behavior in Canada , 2013 .

[25]  Constantine Kontokosta,et al.  Greening the Regulatory Landscape: The Spatial and Temporal Diffusion of Green Building Policies in U.S. Cities , 2012 .

[26]  Cynthia Rudin,et al.  Falling Rule Lists , 2014, AISTATS.

[27]  D. ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Potentials and costs of carbon dioxide mitigation in the world's buildings , 2008 .

[28]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[29]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  The Economics of Energy Efficiency , 2004 .