Investigating Facets to Characterise Citations for Scholars

Citations within academic literature keep gaining more importance both for the work of scholars and for improving digital libraries related tools and services. We present in this article the preliminary results of an investigation on the characterisations of citations whose objective is to propose a framework for globally enriching citations with explicit information about their nature, role and characteristics. This article focuses on the set of properties we are studying to support the automatic analysis of large corpora of citations. This model is grounded on a literature review also detailed here, and has been submitted to a group of several hundreds of scholars of all disciplines in the form of a survey. The results confirm that these properties are perceived as useful.

[1]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Purpose and Polarity of Citation: Towards NLP-based Bibliometrics , 2013, NAACL.

[2]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  A classification scheme for algorithm citation function in scholarly works , 2013, JCDL '13.

[3]  H. D. White Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited. , 2004 .

[4]  Patricio Martínez-Barco,et al.  Citation function, polarity and influence classification , 2017, Natural Language Engineering.

[5]  Günter Krampen,et al.  On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications , 2007, Scientometrics.

[6]  José M. Gómez,et al.  Survey about citation context analysis: Tasks, techniques, and resources , 2015, Natural Language Engineering.

[7]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[8]  C. O. Frost The Use of Citations in Literary Research: A Preliminary Classification of Citation Functions , 1979, The Library Quarterly.

[9]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Identifying Non-Explicit Citing Sentences for Citation-Based Summarization. , 2010, ACL.

[10]  Daniel Lemire,et al.  Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Bluma C. Peritz,et al.  A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields , 1983, Scientometrics.

[12]  M. Miller,et al.  Citations, contexts, and humanistic discourse: Toward automatic extraction and classification , 2014, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[13]  Ulrich Schäfer,et al.  Ensemble-style Self-training on Citation Classification , 2011, IJCNLP.

[14]  Simone Teufel,et al.  Citation Block Determination Using Textual Coherence , 2016, J. Inf. Process..

[15]  Ming Li,et al.  Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[16]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Generating Extractive Summaries of Scientific Paradigms , 2013, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[17]  Ben-Ami Lipetz,et al.  Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators , 1965 .

[18]  Angelo Di Iorio,et al.  Evaluating Citation Functions in CiTO: Cognitive Issues , 2014, ESWC.

[19]  Silvio Peroni,et al.  FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[20]  Stephen Cole The Growth of Scientific Knowledge , 2017 .

[21]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Towards a Generic and Flexible Citation Classifier Based on a Faceted Classification Scheme , 2012, COLING.

[22]  Bonnie J. Dorr,et al.  Citation Handling for Improved Summarization of Scientific Documents , 2011 .

[23]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis , 2017, J. Data Inf. Sci..

[24]  Nigel Harwood An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines , 2009 .

[25]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[26]  Simone Teufel,et al.  Automatic classification of citation function , 2006, EMNLP.

[27]  Angelo Di Iorio,et al.  Characterising Citations in Scholarly Articles: An Experiment , 2013, AIC@AI*IA.

[28]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Simone Teufel,et al.  Towards Domain-Independent Argumentative Zoning: Evidence from Chemistry and Computational Linguistics , 2009, EMNLP.

[30]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics , 1989, Scientometrics.

[31]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Comparing citation contexts for information retrieval , 2008, CIKM '08.

[32]  T. Brooks Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[33]  I. Spiegel-Rosing Science Studies: Bibliometric and Content Analysis , 1977 .

[34]  Guo Zhang,et al.  Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  M. Moravcsik,et al.  Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations , 1975 .

[36]  Yifan He,et al.  Towards Fine-grained Citation Function Classification , 2013, RANLP.