Bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early invasive management can be reduced with radial access, smaller sheath sizes, and timely sheath removal

Objectives: Our objective was to analyze the impact of arterial access site, sheath size, timing of sheath removal, and use of access site closure devices on high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Background: In the SYNERGY trial, 9,978 patients with ACS were randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. Methods: This analysis includes 9,404 patients for whom sheath access information was obtained for the first PCI procedure or diagnostic catheterization. Comparisons of baseline, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were carried out according to access site and sheath size. Results: Overall, 9,404 (94%) patients underwent angiography at a median of 21 hr (25th and 75th percentiles: 5, 42) and 4,687 (50%) underwent PCI at a median of 23 hr (6,49) of enrollment. The access site was femoral for 94.9% of cases, radial for 4.4%, and brachial for 0.7%. Radial access was associated with fewer transfusions than femoral access (0.9% vs. 4.8%, P 5 0.007). For femoral access, the rates of noncoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related TIMI major bleeding by sheath size was 1.5% for 4 or 5 French (Fr), 1.6% for 6 Fr, 3.3% for 7 Fr, and 3.8% for 8 Fr (P < 0.0001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, femoral access site, larger sheath size, and delayed sheath removal were independent predic-

[1]  B. Strauss,et al.  Predictors and 1-year outcome of major bleeding in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registries. , 2005, American heart journal.

[2]  E. Topol,et al.  Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the REPLACE-2 trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  D. Patel,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. , 2004, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[4]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, JAMA.

[5]  R. Schilling,et al.  Radial artery access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Califf,et al.  Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[8]  M. Müllner,et al.  Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2004, JAMA.

[9]  N. Weissman,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  E. Antman,et al.  Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus. , 2002, American heart journal.

[11]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[12]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  K. Fox,et al.  Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[14]  GlYcoprotein IIb,et al.  The SYNERGY trial: study design and rationale. , 2002, American heart journal.

[15]  W. Daniel,et al.  Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: A dual‐center registry , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[16]  P. Widimsky,et al.  Value of first day angiography/angioplasty in evolving Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: an open multicenter randomized trial. The VINO Study. , 2002, European heart journal.

[17]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  [Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban]. , 2001, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[18]  G. Stone,et al.  Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  L. Michalis,et al.  Treatment of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without cardiac surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS study). , 2000, European heart journal.

[20]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[21]  N. Yokoyama,et al.  Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  R. Califf,et al.  Timing of and risk factors for myocardial ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (IMPACT-II). Integrilin to Minimize Platelet Aggregation and Coronary Thrombosis. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  J. Brinker,et al.  A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  F. Ragmin Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study , 1999, The Lancet.

[25]  J. Schneider,et al.  Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[27]  P. Coste,et al.  Comparison of 6F with 7F and 8F guiding catheters for elective coronary angioplasty: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. , 1997, American heart journal.

[28]  G. Laarman,et al.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  M. Moscucci,et al.  Vascular complications of coronary interventions. , 1997, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[30]  R. Califf,et al.  Standard versus low-dose weight-adjusted heparin in patients treated with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody fragment abciximab (c7E3 Fab) during percutaneous coronary revascularization. PROLOG Investigators. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  J. Kupersmith,et al.  Economic and angiographic factors in determining optimal catheter size in performing outpatient left-sided heart and coronary angiography. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  M. Leon,et al.  Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  D. Baim,et al.  Peripheral vascular complications of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting: predictors, management, and outcome. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  M. Leon,et al.  Vascular Complications After Balloon and New Device Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[35]  B. Meier,et al.  Coronary angioplasty through 4 French diagnostic catheters. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[36]  K. Pieper,et al.  Vascular complications of cardiac catheterization. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[37]  K. Mann,et al.  Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Phase II Trial. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[38]  L. Greenfield,et al.  Clinical characteristics and surgical management of vascular complications in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: interventional versus diagnostic procedures. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[39]  R. B. Smith,et al.  Postcatheterization vascular complications associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1990, Journal of vascular surgery.

[40]  W. Klinke,et al.  Comparison of 5F and 7/8F catheters for left ventricular and coronary angiography. , 1990, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[41]  J. Davis,et al.  Cardiac catheterisation by the Judkins technique as an outpatient procedure. , 1989, BMJ.

[42]  R. Califf,et al.  Vascular access site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention with abciximab in the Evaluation of c7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications (EPIC) trial. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[43]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  E. Topol,et al.  Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[45]  B. Meier,et al.  Coronary balloon angioplasty through diagnostic 6 French catheters. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[46]  L. Bentivoglio Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.