Understanding the power requirements of autonomous underwater systems, Part I: An analytical model for optimum swimming speeds and cost of transport

Many marine species exhibit capabilities that would be desirable for manmade systems operating in the maritime environment. However, without detracting from the potential, if bioinspiration is to prove beneficial, it is important to have a consistent set of metrics that allow fair comparison, without bias, when comparing the performance of engineered and biological systems. In this study we focus on deriving an unbiased metric of performance applicable to marine animals and engineered subsea vehicles for one of the most fundamental of properties; that of the energy cost of locomotion. We present a rational analytical model of the physics behind the total energy cost of locomotion applicable to both biological and engineered autonomous underwater marine systems. This model proposes the use of an equivalent spheroid efficiency as a fair metric to compare engineered and biological systems. The model is then utilised to identify how changes in mass, speed, spheroid efficiency and hotel load impact the performance of the system.

[1]  C. R. White,et al.  Mammalian basal metabolic rate is proportional to body mass2/3 , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. S. Glazier,et al.  The 3/4-Power Law Is Not Universal: Evolution of Isometric, Ontogenetic Metabolic Scaling in Pelagic Animals , 2006 .

[3]  B. Nolet,et al.  Costs of swimming measured at optimum speed: scale effects, differences between swimming styles, taxonomic groups and submerged and surface swimming. , 1990, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[4]  Stephen R. Turnock,et al.  Model predictive control of a hybrid autonomous underwater vehicle with experimental verification , 2014 .

[5]  Cornelius Hammer,et al.  FATIGUE AND EXERCISE TESTS WITH FISH , 1995 .

[6]  Akinori Takahashi,et al.  Scaling of swim speed in breath-hold divers. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  Scaling migration speed in animals that run, swim and fly , 2003 .

[8]  John F. Steffensen,et al.  Tail beat frequency as a predictor of swimming speed and oxygen consumption of saithe (Pollachius virens) and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) during forced swimming , 2005 .

[9]  D. Weihs,et al.  Optimal Fish Cruising Speed , 1973, Nature.

[10]  F. Fish POWER OUTPUT AND PROPULSIVE EFFICIENCY OF SWIMMING BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS (TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS) , 1993 .

[11]  Terrie M. Williams,et al.  The evolution of cost efficient swimming in marine mammals: limits to energetic optimization , 1999 .

[12]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Oxygen consumption and swim speed of the harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena , 2001 .

[13]  T. Kanui,et al.  Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology , 1992 .

[14]  T. Clark,et al.  Cardiorespiratory physiology and swimming energetics of a high-energy-demand teleost, the yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  V. V. van Ginneken,et al.  Cost of transport and optimal swimming speed in farmed and wild European silver eels (Anguilla anguilla). , 2008, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[16]  Jon Lien,et al.  Propulsion of a fin whale ( Balenoptera physalus) : why the fin whale is a fast swimmer , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  Dawn P. Noren,et al.  Swimming speed, respiration rate, and estimated cost of transport in adult killer whales , 2009 .

[18]  B. Allen,et al.  Propulsion system performance enhancements on REMUS AUVs , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[19]  V. Tucker Energetic cost of locomotion in animals. , 1970, Comparative biochemistry and physiology.

[20]  George E. P. Box,et al.  The Royal Society of London , 2013 .

[21]  C. Tudorache,et al.  Optimal swimming speeds reflect preferred swimming speeds of brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill, 1874) , 2011, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry.

[22]  John F. Steffensen,et al.  Swimming energetics of the Barents Sea capelin (Mallotus villosus) during the spawning migration period , 2006 .

[23]  Alan J. Murphy,et al.  Nature in engineering for monitoring the oceans: comparison of the energetic costs of marine animals and AUVs , 2012 .

[24]  EUMETOPIAS JUBATUS,et al.  COST OF TRANSPORT IN STELLER SEA LIONS, , 2002 .

[25]  P. Krishnankutty,et al.  Ship Resistance and Propulsion , 2013 .

[26]  David A. S. Rosen,et al.  COST OF TRANSPORT IN STELLER SEA LIONS, EUMETOPIAS JUBATUS , 2002 .

[27]  John P. Comstock,et al.  Principles of naval architecture , 1967 .

[28]  Alan J. Murphy,et al.  Using Bio-Inspiration to Improve Capabilities of Underwater Vehicles , 2011 .

[29]  P. Stevenson,et al.  A Concept Design for an Ultra-Long-Range Survey Class AUV , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[30]  Jill Carlton,et al.  Marine Propellers and Propulsion , 2007 .

[31]  Stephen R. Turnock,et al.  Delphin2: an over actuated autonomous underwater vehicle for manoeuvring research , 2013 .

[32]  Y. Naito,et al.  Swimming speeds and buoyancy compensation of migrating adult chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta revealed by speed/depth/acceleration data logger. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[33]  C. A. Hui,et al.  Power and Speed of Swimming Dolphins , 1987 .

[34]  Frank E. Fish,et al.  Transitions from Drag-based to Lift-based Propulsion in Mammalian Swimming , 1996 .

[35]  J. van Manen,et al.  Principles of Naval Architecture , 1988 .

[36]  A. Heusner,et al.  Body size and energy metabolism. , 1985, Annual review of nutrition.

[37]  Quinn P. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Metabolic scope, swimming performance and the effects of hypoxia in the mulloway, Argyrosomus japonicus (Pisces: Sciaenidae) , 2007 .

[38]  Ian J. Winfield,et al.  The Application of Optimal Foraging Theory to Feeding Behaviour in Fish , 1985 .

[39]  Paul S Agutter,et al.  Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? , 2004, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[40]  J. Steffensen,et al.  Energetics of median and paired fin swimming, body and caudal fin swimming, and gait transition in parrotfish (Scarus schlegeli) and triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  P. Webb Hydrodynamics and Energetics of Fish Propulsion , 1975 .

[42]  P.R. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Trends in biorobotic autonomous undersea vehicles , 2005, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[43]  M. Lighthill Hydromechanics of Aquatic Animal Propulsion , 1969 .

[44]  K Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying, and running. , 1972, Science.

[45]  Eberhard O Voit,et al.  Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling , 2022 .

[46]  F. Hölker,et al.  Swimming efficiency and the influence of morphology on swimming costs in fishes , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[47]  A. Bejan,et al.  Unifying constructal theory for scale effects in running, swimming and flying , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[48]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Laying down the law , 2000, Nature.

[49]  D. S. Glazier,et al.  Beyond the ‘3/4‐power law’: variation in the intra‐and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.