Assessing quality of glycemic control: Hypo- and hyperglycemia, and glycemic variability using mobile self-monitoring of blood glucose system

Although mobile applications bring potential benefits of metabolic control for patients with diabetes, their effect on glycemic fluctuation has been less widely explored. The goal of this study was to utilize data from the Mobile Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose System to obtain a picture of the metabolic progression. Twenty-seven adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited to receive a mobile diabetes self-care system for a six-week period. The approach to the interpretation of glycemic control patterns, utilizes the following methods: 1) Graphical displays of the percentage of hyper-and-hypoglycemia episodes; 2) Pattern recognition of glycemic variability based on a simple equation involving both the standard deviation and the mean. Analytical results reveal that short-term usage of the developed system stabilizes the week-by-week glycemic fluctuations. Four categories were established to distinguish different patterns of patients’ glycemic variation. If patterns of glycemic control can be recognized or interpreted by newly designed mobile applications, then the collection and analysis of metabolic variation will greatly help both health care providers and patients in effective diabetes management.

[1]  G. Ghanizadeh,et al.  Health education via mobile text messaging for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Primary care diabetes.

[2]  Michael Brownlee,et al.  Glycemic variability: a hemoglobin A1c-independent risk factor for diabetic complications. , 2006, JAMA.

[3]  Mu Li,et al.  Can Mobile Phone Apps Influence People’s Health Behavior Change? An Evidence Review , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  I. Hirsch,et al.  Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control? , 2005, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[5]  W. Cefalu,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 Abridged for Primary Care Providers , 2018, Clinical Diabetes.

[6]  Hsiang-Yin Lin,et al.  Glycemic Variability: Clinical and Prognostic Significance , 2015 .

[7]  David Rodbard,et al.  The Challenges of Measuring Glycemic Variability , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  G. Bolli Glucose Variability and Complications , 2006, Diabetes Care.

[9]  Joan Marie Culley,et al.  Exploring app features with outcomes in mHealth studies involving chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, and hypertension: a targeted exploration of the literature , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Gunnar Hartvigsen,et al.  Mobile Health Applications to Assist Patients with Diabetes: Lessons Learned and Design Implications , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[11]  Long Chiau Ming,et al.  Content Analysis of Mobile Health Applications on Diabetes Mellitus , 2017, Front. Endocrinol..

[12]  G. Paolisso,et al.  Glucose variability: An emerging target for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. , 2013, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[13]  R. Kalyani,et al.  Assessing glycemia in diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c. , 2006, JAMA.

[14]  Chun-Yi Lin,et al.  Impact of Mobile Diabetes Self-Care System on patients' knowledge, behavior and efficacy , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[15]  Andrzej M. J. Skulimowski,et al.  Future Trends of Intelligent Decision Support Systems and Models , 2011 .

[16]  Rebecca Grainger,et al.  Use of and Beliefs About Mobile Phone Apps for Diabetes Self-Management: Surveys of People in a Hospital Diabetes Clinic and Diabetes Health Professionals in New Zealand , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[17]  John D. Piette,et al.  National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[18]  Rn Árún K Sigurðardóttir Self-care in diabetes: model of factors affecting self-care , 2005 .

[19]  A. Sigurdardottir,et al.  Self-care in diabetes: model of factors affecting self-care. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[20]  R. Heine,et al.  HbA1c and mean blood glucose show stronger associations with cardiovascular disease risk factors than do postprandial glycaemia or glucose variability in persons with diabetes: the A1C-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study , 2010, Diabetologia.

[21]  Paula Forbes,et al.  mHealth applications for diabetes: User preference and implications for app development , 2016, Health Informatics J..

[22]  P. Choudhary,et al.  Evaluating rate of change as an index of glycemic variability, using continuous glucose monitoring data. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[23]  V. Basevi Standards of medical care in diabetes--2007. , 2009, Diabetes care.

[24]  G. Hartvigsen,et al.  Features of Mobile Diabetes Applications: Review of the Literature and Analysis of Current Applications Compared Against Evidence-Based Guidelines , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  I. Hirsch Blood glucose monitoring technology: translating data into practice. , 2004, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[26]  Yung-Hsiu Lin,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Theory-Based Diabetes Support Services , 2013, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.