Sample size considerations for split-mouth design

Split-mouth designs are frequently used in dental clinical research, where a mouth is divided into two or more experimental segments that are randomly assigned to different treatments. It has the distinct advantage of removing a lot of inter-subject variability from the estimated treatment effect. Methods of statistical analyses for split-mouth design have been well developed. However, little work is available on sample size consideration at the design phase of a split-mouth trial, although many researchers pointed out that the split-mouth design can only be more efficient than a parallel-group design when within-subject correlation coefficient is substantial. In this paper, we propose to use the generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach to assess treatment effect in split-mouth trials, accounting for correlations among observations. Closed-form sample size formulas are introduced for the split-mouth design with continuous and binary outcomes, assuming exchangeable and “nested exchangeable” correlation structures for outcomes from the same subject. The statistical inference is based on the large sample approximation under the GEE approach. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the finite-sample performance of the GEE sample size formulas. A dental clinical trial example is presented for illustration.

[1]  Sin-Ho Jung,et al.  Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[3]  A M Osteen,et al.  Continuing medical education. , 1990, JAMA.

[4]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[5]  A. Donner,et al.  Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Binary Data in Split‐Cluster Designs , 2004, Biometrics.

[6]  M. Bigby,et al.  Understanding and evaluating clinical trials. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Song Zhang,et al.  Sample size calculation for time-averaged differences in the presence of missing data. , 2012, Contemporary clinical trials.

[9]  N. Pandis Sample calculation for split-mouth designs. , 2012, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  Sample size calculations for time-averaged difference of longitudinal binary outcomes , 2017, Communications in statistics: theory and methods.

[11]  M. Speechley,et al.  Clinical effect of subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation on gingivitis in adolescent orthodontic patients. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  W. Loesche,et al.  Efficiency of split-mouth designs. , 1990, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  Steven Teerenstra,et al.  Sample Size Considerations for GEE Analyses of Three‐Level Cluster Randomized Trials , 2010, Biometrics.

[14]  K Y Liang,et al.  Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations. , 1997, Biometrics.

[15]  Ameet Bakhai,et al.  Clinical Trials - A Practical Guide to Design, Analysis, and Reporting , 2006 .

[16]  Sin-Ho Jung,et al.  Sample size for a two‐group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  The design and analysis of split‐mouth studies: What statisticians and clinicians should know , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  A Donner,et al.  Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split‐mouth designs with baseline measurements , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Robert A Weiss,et al.  Comparison of Endovenous Radiofrequency Versus 810 nm Diode Laser Occlusion of Large Veins in an Animal Model , 2002, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].