The Impact of Process Mapping on Transparency

Purpose - Process mapping is used to articulate the activities and procedures of business entities in a graphical way as pictorial images readily convey considerable information. The objective of this research is to provide evidence and a methodology to assist organizations in evaluating the early stages of their process mapping efforts. Design/methodology/approach - A review of literature identifies key characteristics of transparency (process visibility) related to process mapping. Quizzes and surveys are used to study the impact of process mapping on transparency in an employee training session. Findings - The paper finds that process mapping increases transparency between 5 percent and 27 percent for the applications discussed in this paper. Research limitations/implications - The research presumes that better understanding and recall of the company's business processes equates to higher transparency. This research study is limited to one field test, organization, and process mapping methodology. These limitations should be considered when extrapolating the results to other organizations. Practical implications - The methodology outlined in this paper provides a way to measure the impact that formalizing (mapping) an organization's business processes and then using these maps to communicate the organization's business processes has on an individual employee's understanding and recall of those business processes. This methodology may help other organizations evaluate the early stages of their process mapping efforts. Originality/value - A measurable definition of transparency is developed. A field study provides evidence that process mapping increases transparency and a methodology is shared for others to study the impacts of their process mapping efforts.

[1]  Leidy Klotz,et al.  A Lean Modeling Protocol for Evaluating Green Project Delivery , 2007 .

[2]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[4]  Robert Damelio,et al.  The Basics of Process Mapping , 1996 .

[5]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  Representing process: the contribution of a re‐engineering frame , 1998 .

[6]  Martin Sexton,et al.  Process models implementation in the construction industry: a literature synthesis , 2005 .

[7]  Robert B. Pojasek Putting hierarchical process maps to work , 2006 .

[8]  John R. Shook,et al.  Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and , 1998 .

[9]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Sustainable Construction : Green Building Design and Delivery , 2005 .

[10]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Organisational learning and innovation in the construction industry , 2000 .

[11]  C. Bauch Lean Product Development: Making Waste Transparent , 2004 .

[12]  David R. Riley,et al.  Lean Processes for Sustainable Project Delivery , 2006 .

[13]  Simon A. Austin,et al.  Mapping the conceptual design activity of interdisciplinary teams , 2001 .

[14]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  Product development process modeling , 1999 .

[15]  Angela Lee,et al.  MAPPING THE PRODUCTION PROCESS: A CASE STUDY , 2002 .

[16]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Measuring Process Modelling Success , 2002, ECIS.

[17]  Maria Vakola,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between the Use of Evaluation in Business Process Re-engineering and Organisational Learning and Innovation. , 2000 .

[18]  Bill Curtis,et al.  Process modeling , 1992, CACM.