The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: An ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology

Theories of morphological processing differ on the issue of how lexical and grammatical information are stored and accessed. A key point of contention is whether complex forms are decomposed during recognition (e.g., establish+ment), compared to forms that cannot be analyzed into constituent morphemes (e.g., apartment). In the present study, we examined these issues with respect to English derivational morphology by measuring ERP responses during a cross-modal priming lexical decision task. ERP priming effects for semantically and phonologically transparent derived words (government-govern) were compared to those of semantically opaque derived words (apartment-apart) as well as "quasi-regular" items that represent intermediate cases of morphological transparency (dresser-dress). Additional conditions independently manipulated semantic and phonological relatedness in non-derived words (semantics: couch-sofa; phonology: panel-pan). The degree of N400 ERP priming to morphological forms varied depending on the amount of semantic and phonological overlap between word types, rather than respecting a bivariate distinction between derived and opaque forms. Moreover, these effects could not be accounted for by semantic or phonological relatedness alone. The findings support the theory that morphological relatedness is graded rather than absolute, and depend on the joint contribution of form and meaning overlap.

[1]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2008 .

[2]  Aneta Kielar,et al.  Graded Effects of Regularity in Language Revealed by N400 Indices of Morphological Priming , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  W. Badecker,et al.  Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task , 2002 .

[4]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological priming without morphological relationship , 2003 .

[5]  V. Marchman,et al.  From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets , 1993, Cognition.

[6]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[7]  S. E. Napps,et al.  Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[8]  P. Holcomb Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.

[9]  Kathleen Rastle,et al.  ERP Evidence of Morphological Analysis from Orthography: A Masked Priming Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning , 2008, Language and cognitive processes.

[11]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Visual Word Priming Effects , 2000, Brain and Language.

[12]  Jay G Rueckl,et al.  Are CORNER and BROTHER morphologically complex? Not in the long term , 2008, Language and cognitive processes.

[13]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[15]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form , 2000 .

[16]  J. Grainger,et al.  Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Modeling morphological processing. , 1995 .

[18]  C. Davis N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[19]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Visual semantic features are activated during the processing of concrete words: event-related potential evidence for perceptual semantic priming. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  S. Bentin,et al.  The Contribution of Morphological and Semantic Relatedness to Repetition Priming at Short and Long Lags: Evidence from Hebrew , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Morphological Priming in Spanish Verb Forms: An ERP Repetition Priming Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Universals in Morphological Representation: Evidence from Italian , 1997 .

[23]  L. Feldman,et al.  Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. , 2002 .

[24]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Abstractness, Allomorphy, and Lexical Architecture , 1999 .

[25]  J. Rueckl,et al.  Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks , 1997 .

[26]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Graded Aspects of Morphological Processing: Task and Processing Time , 2002, Brain and Language.

[27]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition , 2005 .

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  ‘Words or Rules’ cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Shu Hua,et al.  Monolingual and Bilingual Recognition of Regular and Irregular English Verbs: Sensitivity to Form Similarity Varies with First Language Experience. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[30]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[31]  D. Deacon,et al.  Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  C A Fowler,et al.  Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon , 1987, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[33]  M. Taft A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation , 1988 .

[34]  J. Morton,et al.  The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[35]  D. Besner,et al.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography , 2008 .

[37]  K. Tsapkini,et al.  Does Phonological Change Play a Role in the Recognition of Derived Forms across Modalities? , 1999, Brain and Language.

[38]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study , 2006, Brain and Language.

[39]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Differentiating Morphology, Form, and Meaning: Neural Correlates of Morphological Complexity , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  L. Feldman,et al.  Morphological Priming: The Role of Prime Duration, Semantic Transparency, and Affix Position , 1999, Brain and Language.

[43]  Helen L Jamison,et al.  Morphology and the internal structure of words. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[45]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Brian T. Gold,et al.  Neural Correlates of Morphological Decomposition during Visual Word Recognition , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. , 1995 .

[48]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  C. Fowler,et al.  The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[51]  K. Forster,et al.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociating types of mental computation , 1997, Nature.

[53]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[54]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Dual-route processing of complex words: New fMRI evidence from derivational suffixation , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[55]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming , 2008, Language and cognitive processes.

[56]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study , 2000 .

[57]  M. Masson,et al.  Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Morphological processing in early bilinguals: an ERP study of regular and irregular verb processing. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[59]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Patrick A. O’Connor,et al.  Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[62]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .

[63]  Mary Hare,et al.  Priming English past tense verbs : Rules or statistics? , 2008 .

[64]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  G. A. Murrell,et al.  WORD RECOGNITION AND MORPHEMIC STRUCTURE , 1974 .

[66]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[67]  Dana M. Basnight-Brown,et al.  List context fosters semantic processing: parallels between semantic and morphological facilitation when primes are forward masked. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming and stimulus classification in young, middle-aged, and older adults. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[69]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[70]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[71]  K I Forster,et al.  Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Exploring the Activation of Semantic and Phonological Codes during Speech Planning with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain Research.

[75]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Priming homographic stems , 1989 .

[76]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Primed Lexical Decision: Combined Effects of the Proportion of Related Prime-Target Pairs and the Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target , 1984 .

[77]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[78]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? , 2000 .

[79]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[80]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Morphological Composition in the Lexical Output System , 1991 .