Motor conflict in Stroop tasks: Direct evidence from single-trial electro-myography and electro-encephalography

Several brain imaging studies have assumed that response conflict is present in Stroop tasks. However, this has not been demonstrated directly. We examined the time-course of stimulus and response conflict resolution in a numerical Stroop task by combining single-trial electro-myography (EMG) and event-related brain potentials (ERP). EMG enabled the direct tracking of response conflict and the peak latency of the P300 ERP wave was used to index stimulus conflict. In correctly responded trials of the incongruent condition EMG detected robust incorrect response hand activation which appeared consistently in single trials. In 50-80% of the trials correct and incorrect response hand activation coincided temporally, while in 20-50% of the trials incorrect hand activation preceded correct hand activation. EMG data provides robust direct evidence for response conflict. However, congruency effects also appeared in the peak latency of the P300 wave which suggests that stimulus conflict also played a role in the Stroop paradigm. Findings are explained by the continuous flow model of information processing: Partially processed task-irrelevant stimulus information can result in stimulus conflict and can prepare incorrect response activity. A robust congruency effect appeared in the amplitude of incongruent vs. congruent ERPs between 330-400 ms, this effect may be related to the activity of the anterior cingulate cortex.

[1]  A. J. Fridlund,et al.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[2]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict : Effects of Response Modality and Processing Domain , 2022 .

[3]  E. Donchin.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[4]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[6]  Valéria Csépe,et al.  The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  John Polich,et al.  P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[9]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  E. Gratton,et al.  A continuously variable frequency cross-correlation phase fluorometer with picosecond resolution. , 1983, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Borís Burle,et al.  Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis , 2002, Psychological research.

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Conflict Monitoring, and Levels of Processing , 2001, NeuroImage.

[14]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[15]  G Mulder,et al.  Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[16]  W. Skrandies.  Visual information processing: topography of brain electrical activity , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[18]  C J Aine,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Event‐Related Potentials to Stroop Stimuli , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  N. Cohen,et al.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  V. Csépe,et al.  The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[21]  R. West,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Carmen M. Atkinson,et al.  Event-related potentials to Stroop and reverse Stroop stimuli. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[24]  C. Eriksen,et al.  An electromyographic examination of response competition , 1985 .

[25]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[26]  H. Masaki,et al.  An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[27]  S M McGill,et al.  The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. , 1999, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[28]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[29]  H. Mayberg,et al.  An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  John Morton,et al.  Selective Attention to Words and Colours , 1973 .

[32]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[34]  C Alain,et al.  Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[36]  C. Liston,et al.  Anterior Cingulate and Posterior Parietal Cortices Are Sensitive to Dissociable Forms of Conflict in a Task-Switching Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[37]  Valéria Csépe,et al.  Electroencephalography effects to semantic and non-semantic mismatch in properties of visually presented single-characters: The N2b and the N400 , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  L. Mulder,et al.  Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  B. Kopell,et al.  The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. , 1981, Science.

[41]  Dénes Szücs,et al.  Real-time Tracking of Motor Response Activation and Response Competition in a Stroop Task in Young Children: A Lateralized Readiness Potential Study , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Hellmuth Obrig,et al.  The fast optical signal—Robust or elusive when non-invasively measured in the human adult? , 2005, NeuroImage.

[43]  H Egeth,et al.  Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  F. Vidal,et al.  Effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: an electromyographic study in humans. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  When in Doubt, Do it Both Ways: Brain Evidence of the Simultaneous Activation of Conflicting Motor Responses in a Spatial Stroop Task , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex activity can be independent of response conflict in Stroop-like tasks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. , 2001, Cerebral Cortex.

[49]  Frank Rösler,et al.  N400 Effects Reflect Activation Spread During Retrieval of Arithmetic Facts , 1999 .

[50]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[53]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[54]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study , 2008, Brain Research.

[55]  J. Lannou,et al.  The Stroop's test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400. , 1997, The International journal of neuroscience.