Phase II trial of continuous low-dose temozolomide for patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

BACKGROUND In this phase II trial, we investigated the efficacy of a metronomic temozolomide schedule in the treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas (MGs). METHODS Eligible patients received daily temozolomide (50 mg/m2) continuously until progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months in the glioblastoma cohort (N = 37). In an exploratory analysis, 10 additional recurrent grade III MG patients were enrolled. Correlative studies included evaluation of 76 frequent mutations in glioblastoma (iPLEX assay, Sequenom) aiming at establishing the frequency of potentially "drugable" mutations in patients entering recurrent MG clinical trials. RESULTS Among glioblastoma patients, median age was 56 y; median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 80; 62% of patients had been treated for ≥2 recurrences, including 49% of patients having failed bevacizumab. Treatment was well tolerated; clinical benefit (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was seen in 10 (36%) patients. Progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 19% and median overall survival was 7 months. Patients with previous bevacizumab exposure survived significantly less than bevacizumab-naive patients (median overall survival: 4.3 mo vs 13 mo; hazard ratio = 3.2; P = .001), but those patients had lower KPS (P = .04) and higher number of recurrences (P < .0001). Mutations were found in 13 of the 38 MGs tested, including mutations of EGFR (N = 10), IDH1 (N = 5), and ERBB2 (N = 1). CONCLUSIONS In spite of a heavily pretreated population, including nearly half of patients having failed bevacizumab, the primary endpoint was met, suggesting that this regimen deserves further investigation. Results in bevacizumab-naive patients seemed particularly favorable, while results in bevacizumab-failing patients highlight the need to develop further treatment strategies for advanced MG. Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT00498927 (available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00498927).

[1]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Prospective, high-throughput molecular profiling of human gliomas , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[2]  H. Friedman,et al.  Bevacizumab and daily temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma , 2012, Cancer.

[3]  R. McLendon,et al.  Phase II study of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for bevacizumab naïve, recurrent glioblastoma , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[4]  R. McLendon,et al.  Phase 2 study of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy , 2011, Cancer.

[5]  P. Wen,et al.  Discontinuing bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma: an ethical analysis. , 2011, The oncologist.

[6]  M. Chamberlain The paradoxical effect of bevacizumab in the therapy of malignant gliomas , 2011, Neurology.

[7]  R. Beroukhim,et al.  Retrospective study of dasatinib for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab failure , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[8]  U. Abacıoğlu,et al.  Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[9]  R. McLendon,et al.  Phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[10]  K. Aldape,et al.  RTOG 0525: A randomized phase III trial comparing standard adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with a dose-dense (dd) schedule in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Antiangiogenic therapy: impact on invasion, disease progression, and metastasis , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[12]  J. Reijneveld,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Angiogenesis inhibition in high grade glioma Verhoeff , 2009 .

[13]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  The role of salvage reirradiation for malignant gliomas that progress on bevacizumab , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[14]  W. Mason,et al.  Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Jung-Il Lee,et al.  Phase II trial of low-dose continuous (metronomic) treatment of temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[16]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Rebound tumour progression after the cessation of bevacizumab therapy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[17]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[18]  G. Fuller,et al.  Tumor invasion after treatment of glioblastoma with bevacizumab: radiographic and pathologic correlation in humans and mice , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[19]  R. McLendon,et al.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Keith L. Ligon,et al.  Profiling Critical Cancer Gene Mutations in Clinical Tumor Samples , 2009, PloS one.

[21]  L. Deangelis,et al.  Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastoma , 2009, Neurology.

[22]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  P. Wen,et al.  Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab. , 2009, Neuro-oncology.

[24]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain mutations in primary glioblastoma , 2009, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[25]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Neurooncology clinical trial design for targeted therapies: lessons learned from the North American Brain Tumor Consortium. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[27]  Timothy F Cloughesy,et al.  Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[28]  P. Wen,et al.  Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas , 2008, Neurology.

[29]  J. Gallo,et al.  Impact of Angiogenesis Inhibition by Sunitinib on Tumor Distribution of Temozolomide , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[30]  A. Heerschap,et al.  Antiangiogenic compounds interfere with chemotherapy of brain tumors due to vessel normalization , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[31]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Efficacy and tolerability of temozolomide in an alternating weekly regimen in patients with recurrent glioma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  E. Raymond,et al.  Lessons learned in the development of targeted therapy for malignant gliomas , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[33]  Darell D. Bigner,et al.  Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Recurrent Malignant Glioma , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation in Glioblastoma through Novel Missense Mutations in the Extracellular Domain , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[35]  A. Brandes,et al.  Temozolomide 3 weeks on and 1 week off as first-line therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: phase II study from gruppo italiano cooperativo di neuro-oncologia (GICNO) , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[36]  Hyun Seok Song,et al.  Metronomic treatment of temozolomide inhibits tumor cell growth through reduction of angiogenesis and augmentation of apoptosis in orthotopic models of gliomas. , 2006, Oncology reports.

[37]  A. Omuro,et al.  Salvage temozolomide for prior temozolomide responders , 2005, Cancer.

[38]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  H. Kurzen,et al.  Inhibition of angiogenesis by non-toxic doses of temozolomide , 2003, Anti-cancer drugs.

[40]  A. Tolcher,et al.  Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[41]  J M Gallo,et al.  Pharmacodynamic-mediated reduction of temozolomide tumor concentrations by the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470. , 2001, Cancer research.

[42]  D. Osoba,et al.  A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[43]  M J Gleason,et al.  Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Disease course patterns after discontinuation of bevacizumab: pooled analysis of randomized phase III trials. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  J. Uhm Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group , 2010 .

[47]  J. Buckner,et al.  The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. , 2007, Neuro-oncology.

[48]  A. Verma MGMT Gene Silencing and Benefit From Temozolomide in Glioblastoma , 2006 .

[49]  J. Raizer,et al.  A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas. , 2002, Neuro-oncology.