PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF SPATIAL AUDIO : WHERE NEXT ?

From the early days of reproduced sound, engineers have sought to reproduce the spatial properties of sound fields, leading to the development of a range of technologies. Two-channel stereo has been prevalent for many years; however, systems with a higher number of discrete channels (including rear and height loudspeakers) are becoming more common and, recently, there has been a move towards loudspeaker-agnostic methods using audio objects. Perceptual evaluation, and perceptually-informed objective measurement, of alternative reproduction systems can inform further development and steer future innovations. It is important, therefore, that any gaps in the field of perceptual evaluation and measurement are identified and that future work aims to fill those gaps. A standard research paradigm in the field is identification of the perceptual attributes of a stimulus set, facilitating controlled listening tests and leading to the development of predictive models. There have been numerous studies that aim to discover the perceptual attributes of reproduced spatial sound, leading to more than fifty descriptive terms. However, a literature review revealed the following key problems: (i) there is little agreement on exact definitions, nor on the relative importance of each attribute; (ii) there may be important attributes that have not yet been identified (e.g. attributes arising from differences between real and reproduced audio, or pertaining to new 3D or object-based methods); and (iii) there is no model of overall spatial quality based directly on the important attributes. Consequently, the authors contend that future research should focus on: (i) ascertaining which attributes of reproduced spatial audio are most important to listeners; (ii) identifying any important attributes currently missing; (iii) determining the relationships between the important attributes and listener preference; (iv) modelling overall spatial quality in terms of the important perceptual attributes; and (v) modelling these perceptual attributes in terms of their physical correlates.

[1]  Mathieu Paquier,et al.  State of the art on subjective assessment of spatial sound quality , 2010 .

[2]  Tim Brookes,et al.  Elicitation of the differences between real and reproduced audio , 2015 .

[3]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  On Some Biases Encountered in Modern Audio Quality Listening Tests-A Review , 2008 .

[4]  Sylvain Choisel,et al.  Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Günther Theile,et al.  On the Naturalness of Two-Channel Stereo Sound , 1991 .

[6]  Tomasz Letowski,et al.  Sound Quality Assessment: Concepts and Criteria , 1989 .

[7]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Spatial quality evaluation for reproduced sound: terminology, meaning and a scene-based paradigm , 2002 .

[8]  Bent F. Hertz 100 Years with Stereo!: The Beginning , 1981 .

[9]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  On the relative importance of spatial and timbral fidelities in judgments of degraded multichannel audio quality. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Takeo Shiga,et al.  Subjective Assessment of Multichannel Reproduction , 1971 .

[11]  Kenji Ozawa,et al.  CONTENTS WHICH YIELD HIGH AUDITORY-PRESENCE IN SOUND REPRODUCTION , 2002 .

[12]  Kenji Ozawa,et al.  Psychological factors involved in auditory presence , 2003 .

[13]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Verification and correlation of attributes used for describing the spatial quality of reproduced sound , 2001 .

[14]  Nick Zacharov,et al.  Audio descriptive analysis & mapping of spatial sound displays , 2001 .

[15]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Spatial Audio Quality Perception (Part 2): A Linear Regression Model , 2015 .

[16]  Mathieu Paquier,et al.  Families of sound attributes for assessment of spatial audio , 2010 .

[17]  Catherine Guastavino,et al.  SPATIAL AUDIO QUALITY EVALUATION: COMPARING TRANSAURAL, AMBISONICS AND STEREO , 2007 .

[18]  Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems , 2015 .

[19]  Munhum Park,et al.  Data-Driven Modeling of the Spatial Sound Experience , 2014 .

[20]  Sylvain Choisel,et al.  Extraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound , 2006 .

[21]  Catherine Guastavino,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of multi-dimensional spatial audio reproduction. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Francis Rumsey Subjective Assessment of the Spatial Attributes of Reproduced Sound , 1998 .

[23]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Spatial Audio Quality Perception (Part 1): Impact of Commonly Encountered Processes , 2015 .

[24]  Florian Wickelmaier,et al.  Perceptual Audio Evaluation - Theory, Method and Application , 2006 .

[25]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Identification of Quality Attributes of Spatial Audio by Repertory Grid Technique , 2006 .

[26]  Floyd E. Toole Subjective Measurements of Loudspeaker Sound Quality and Listener Performance , 1985 .

[27]  Gaetan Lorho Perceptual Evaluation of Mobile Multimedia Loudspeakers , 2007 .