Identifying Parameters for Microsimulation Modeling of Traffic in Inclement Weather

There is often a desire to use microsimulation models to evaluate road improvements or new traffic management strategies under different weather conditions. However, conventional simulation models do not provide the ability to directly specify weather conditions as an input. Instead, it is necessary to determine (a) the impact that a specific weather condition has on traffic operations, quantified in terms of the traffic stream parameters (i.e., free speed, speed at capacity, capacity, and jam density); and (b) appropriate values for the microsimulation model input parameters to generate a simulated traffic stream that has the desired characteristics. This paper addresses this second challenge for the Vissim microsimulation model. On the basis of existing literature, an initial list of 21 input parameters was identified. A sensitivity analysis was performed, and nine key input parameters were selected. A set of simulation runs was conducted; these runs used various combinations of values for the nine input parameters. A neural network model was calibrated and validated with these data. The model requires, as inputs, the free speed, the speed at capacity, the capacity, and the jam density of the traffic stream. The model provides as outputs the values for the nine Vissim input parameters. These values, combined with the default values for the remaining parameters, provide a traffic stream with the desired characteristics. The neural network model has been coded into a software tool, which is available online.

[1]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Heaton T. Jeff,et al.  Introduction to Neural Networks with Java , 2005 .

[3]  Byungkyu Brian Park,et al.  Microscopic simulation model calibration and validation for freeway work zone network - a case study of VISSIM , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[4]  W. V. Winsum THE HUMAN ELEMENT IN CAR FOLLOWING MODELS , 1999 .

[5]  Don Scott,et al.  Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Microscopic Analysis of Traffic Flow in Inclement Weather--Part 2 , 2009 .

[7]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Multivariate calibration of single regime speed-flow-density relationships [road traffic management] , 1995, Pacific Rim TransTech Conference. 1995 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference Proceedings. 6th International VNIS. A Ride into the Future.

[8]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for calibrating VISSIM in Modeling the Zurich Network , 2012 .

[9]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Calibration of Steady-State Car-Following Models Using Macroscopic Loop Detector Data , 2010 .

[10]  J. Edwards,et al.  Speed adjustment of motorway commuter traffic to inclement weather , 1999 .

[11]  Roberto Horowitz,et al.  Calibration of VISSIM for a Congested Freeway , 2004 .

[12]  Stéphane Caro,et al.  A Cybernetic Perspective on Car Following in Fog , 2017 .

[13]  Randy Machemehl,et al.  Vissim: A Multi-Parameter Sensitivity Analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[14]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Calibrating Steady-State Traffic Stream and Car-Following Models Using Loop Detector Data , 2010, Transp. Sci..

[15]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Empirical Studies on Traffic Flow in Inclement Weather , 2006 .

[16]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[17]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation: Case Study of VISSIM Simulation Model for a Coordinated Actuated Signal System , 2003 .

[18]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[19]  Fabrice Vienne,et al.  The Influence of Fog on Motion Discrimination Thresholds in Car Following , 2017 .