Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics.

Computational models have recently been developed to replicate experimental conditions present in the Stanmore knee wear simulator. These finite element (FE) models, which provide a virtual platform to evaluate total knee replacement (TKR) mechanics, were validated through comparisons with experimental data for a specific implant. As with any experiment, a small amount of variability is inherently present in component alignment, loading, and environmental conditions, but this variability has not been previously incorporated in the computational models. The objectives of the current research were to assess the impact of experimental variability on predicted TKR mechanics by determining the potential envelope of joint kinematics and contact mechanics present during wear simulator loading, and to evaluate the sensitivity of the joint mechanics to the experimental parameters. In this study, 8 component alignment and 4 experimental parameters were represented as distributions and used with probabilistic methods to assess the response of the system, including interaction effects. The probabilistic FE model evaluated two levels of parameter variability (with standard deviations of component alignment parameters up to 0.5mm and 1 degrees ) and predicted a variability of up to 226% (3.44mm) in resulting anterior-posterior (AP) translation, up to 169% (4.30 degrees ) in internal-external (IE) rotation, but less than 10% (1.66MPa) in peak contact pressure. The critical alignment parameters were the tilt of the tibial insert and the IE rotational alignment of the femoral component. The observed variability in kinematics and, to a lesser extent, contact pressure, has the potential to impact wear observed experimentally.

[1]  Erwin V. Zaretsky,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Aircraft Gas Turbine Disk Life and Reliability , 1999 .

[2]  P S Walker,et al.  The effect of contact area on wear in relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  Benjamin J Fregly,et al.  Computational wear prediction of a total knee replacement from in vivo kinematics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A J Petrella,et al.  The effect of component placement on knee kinetics after arthroplasty with an unconstrained prosthesis , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  Richard M Aspden,et al.  Statistical methods in finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design (Haldar, Mahadevan) , 1999 .

[7]  C. J. Bell,et al.  The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Myron Spector,et al.  Effects of contact area and stress on the volumetric wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene , 2003 .

[9]  Thomas P. Andriacchi,et al.  The influence of slip velocity on wear of total knee arthroplasty , 2005 .

[10]  I. Clarke,et al.  Effects of A-P translation and rotation on the wear of UHMWPE in a total knee joint simulator. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  M Beaugonin,et al.  Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Y Zhang,et al.  Reliability-based design of automobile components , 2002 .

[13]  J. Lonner,et al.  Lateral retinacular release as a function of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  M Browne,et al.  Reliability theory for load bearing biomedical implants. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[15]  P. Walker,et al.  The Dominance of Cyclic Sliding in Producing Wear in Total Knee Replacements , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  L. Dorr,et al.  Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  Paul J Rullkoetter,et al.  Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Jason P. Halloran,et al.  Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  M. Bankes,et al.  Evaluation of tibial component angles in 79 consecutive total knee arthroplasties , 1999 .

[20]  H. Sahai,et al.  The Analysis of Variance: Fixed, Random and Mixed Models , 2000 .

[21]  D R Broome,et al.  A knee simulating machine for performance evaluation of total knee replacements. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  P. Nicolai,et al.  The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  J D DesJardins,et al.  The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs during functional activity. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  P S Walker,et al.  Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .