Opportunities for water saving with higher yield from the system of rice intensification

The system of rice intensification (SRI) developed in Madagascar, is showing that by changing the management of rice plants, soil, water and nutrients it can increase the yields of irrigated rice by 25–50% or more while reducing water requirements by an equivalent percent. This gives farmers incentive to reduce their irrigation water use when growing rice, especially since SRI methods can also reduce farmers’ costs of production which increases their net income ha−1 by even more than yield. Even though these results sound fantastic, the validity of SRI concepts and practices has been demonstrated in more than 20 countries to date. This article considers, first, the methods that make these improvements possible and how these are achieved. It then briefly surveys SRI experience in five Asian countries, incentives in addition to yield, water-saving and profitability for adopting SRI, and possible limitations or disadvantages with the methodology. Next, it comments on the debate over SRI in the agronomic literature and then adds to the empirical record by reporting in some detail on SRI evaluations in two of India’s main rice-growing states, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, where water availability is becoming more problematic and where SRI use is spreading. Finally, the article briefly discusses some implications of saving irrigation water by changing resource management rather than by using on more or different inputs.

[1]  A. Dobermann A critical assessment of the system of rice intensification (SRI) , 2004 .

[2]  Tatsuhiko Shiraiwa,et al.  Can Yields of Lowland Rice Resume the Increases that They Showed in the 1980s? , 2005 .

[3]  C. Barrett,et al.  The disappointing adoption dynamics of a yield-increasing, low external-input technology: the case of SRI in Madagascar , 2003 .

[4]  Hai-Ping Cheng,et al.  Ascending Migration of Endophytic Rhizobia, from Roots to Leaves, inside Rice Plants and Assessment of Benefits to Rice Growth Physiology , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  De-feng Zhu,et al.  Effect of SWD irrigation on photosynthesis and grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) , 2005 .

[6]  J. Anthofer The Potential of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for Poverty Reduction in Cambodia , 2004 .

[7]  S. I. Bhuiyan,et al.  Producing more rice with less water from irrigated systems , 1998 .

[8]  N. Uphoff Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems , 2006 .

[9]  Willem A. Stoop,et al.  A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers , 2002 .

[10]  N. Uphoff Higher Yields with Fewer External Inputs? The System of Rice Intensification and Potential Contributions to Agricultural Sustainability , 2003 .

[11]  F. Dazzo,et al.  The natural rhizobium-cereal crop association as and example of plant-bacteria interaction , 2006 .

[12]  Regassa E. Namara,et al.  Prospects for adopting system of rice intensification in Sri Lanka: a socioeconomic assessment , 2003 .

[13]  H. Berge,et al.  Yield formation in rice in response to drainage and nitrogen application , 1997 .

[14]  S. K. Sinha,et al.  Impact of system of rice intensification (SRI) on rice yields: results of a new sample study in Purulia District, India , 2005 .

[15]  Philip M. Haygarth,et al.  Biogeochemistry: Phosphorus solubilization in rewetted soils , 2001, Nature.

[16]  R. Nagarajan,et al.  Site-specific nutrient management for intensive rice cropping systems in Asia , 2002 .

[17]  Francis Chaboussou,et al.  Healthy Crops: A New Agricultural Revolution , 2004 .

[18]  Willem A. Stoop,et al.  The SRI controversy: a response , 2005 .

[19]  B. P. Ghildyal,et al.  Nature and growth pattern of rice root system under submerged and unsaturated conditions. , 1974 .

[20]  M. Latif,et al.  Validation of the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Bangladesh , 2005 .

[21]  M. Bonkowski Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[22]  B. Bouman,et al.  Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice , 2001 .

[23]  C. Surridge Rice cultivation: Feast or famine? , 2004, Nature.

[24]  Roberto Pinton,et al.  The rhizosphere : biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface , 2007 .

[25]  C. Barrett,et al.  Better Technology, Better Plots, or Better Farmers? Identifying Changes in Productivity and Risk Among Malagasy Rice Farmers , 2004 .

[26]  P. L. Mitchell,et al.  Fantastic yields in the system of rice intensification: fact or fallacy? , 2004 .

[27]  F. Martin,et al.  Mycorrhizal Fungi: A Fungal Community at the Interface Between Soil and Roots , 2007 .

[28]  J. L. W. Rademaker,et al.  The beneficial plant growth-promoting association of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii with rice roots , 2001 .

[29]  D. Datta,et al.  Principles and Practices of Rice Production , 1981 .

[30]  A. Husain Evaluation of the System of Rice Intensification ( SRI ) Trials in Bangladesh : Results from PETRRA Sub-projects , 2006 .

[31]  S. Riha,et al.  Does the system of rice intensification outperform conventional best management?: A synopsis of the empirical record , 2006 .

[32]  Sofie Dobbelaere,et al.  Plant Growth-Promoting Effects of Diazotrophs in the Rhizosphere , 2003 .

[33]  Norman Uphoff,et al.  Soil Biological Contributions to the System of Rice Intensification , 2006 .

[34]  Tang YongLu,et al.  The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for super-high yields of rice in Sichuan Basin , 2004 .