Structural Anisotropy Governs the Kink Formation in Cellulose Nanocrystals.

Understanding the defect structure is fundamental to correlating the structure and properties of materials. However, little is known about the defects of soft matter at the nanoscale beyond their external morphology. We report here on the molecular-level structural details of kink defects of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) based on a combination of experimental and theoretical methods. Low-dose scanning nanobeam electron diffraction analysis allowed for correlation of the local crystallographic information and nanoscale morphology and revealed that the structural anisotropy governed the kink formation of CNCs. We identified two bending modes along different crystallographic directions with distinct disordered structures at kink points. The drying strongly affected the external morphology of the kinks, resulting in underestimating the kink population in the standard dry observation conditions. These detailed defect analyses improve our understanding of the structural heterogeneity of nanocelluloses and contribute to the future exploitation of soft matter defects.

[1]  N. Kotov,et al.  Elucidating the fine-scale structural morphology of nanocellulose by nano infrared spectroscopy. , 2022, Carbohydrate polymers.

[2]  W. Srubar,et al.  Viscoelastic-mapping of cellulose nanofibrils using low-total-force contact resonance force microscopy (LTF-CRFM) , 2022, Cellulose.

[3]  A. Minor,et al.  4D-STEM of Beam-Sensitive Materials. , 2021, Accounts of chemical research.

[4]  Heng-An Wu,et al.  Intrinsic kink deformation in nanocellulose. , 2021, Carbohydrate Polymers.

[5]  Yu Ogawa.  Release of internal molecular torque results in twists of Glaucocystis cellulose nanofibers. , 2021, Carbohydrate polymers.

[6]  Duncan N. Johnstone,et al.  Local Crystallinity in Twisted Cellulose Nanofibers , 2020, ACS nano.

[7]  A. Isogai,et al.  Changes to the Contour Length, Molecular Chain Length, and Solid-State Structures of Nanocellulose Resulting from Sonication in Water. , 2020, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  Peter N. Ciesielski,et al.  Nanomechanics of cellulose deformation reveal molecular defects that facilitate natural deconstruction , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. Mezzenga,et al.  Nanostructural Properties and Twist Periodicity of Cellulose Nanofibrils with Variable Charge Density. , 2019, Biomacromolecules.

[10]  José A. Rodríguez,et al.  Nanoscale mosaicity revealed in peptide microcrystals by scanning electron nanodiffraction , 2019, Communications Biology.

[11]  R. Mezzenga,et al.  Confinement‐Induced Ordering and Self‐Folding of Cellulose Nanofibrils , 2018, Advanced science.

[12]  K. Mazeau,et al.  Iα to Iβ mechano-conversion and amorphization in native cellulose simulated by crystal bending , 2018, Cellulose.

[13]  R. Mezzenga,et al.  Nanocellulose Fragmentation Mechanisms and Inversion of Chirality from the Single Particle to the Cholesteric Phase. , 2017, ACS nano.

[14]  M. Rosa,et al.  Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: Properties and morphological features. , 2017, Carbohydrate polymers.

[15]  A. Minor,et al.  Orientation mapping of semicrystalline polymers using scanning electron nanobeam diffraction. , 2016, Micron.

[16]  Lei Wan,et al.  Nanoscale chemical imaging by photoinduced force microscopy , 2016, Science Advances.

[17]  G. Maret,et al.  Negative Diamagnetic Anisotropy and Birefringence of Cellulose Nanocrystals , 2015 .

[18]  L. Bergström,et al.  Understanding nanocellulose chirality and structure–properties relationship at the single fibril level , 2015, Nature Communications.

[19]  E. Rauch,et al.  Automated crystal orientation and phase mapping in TEM , 2014 .

[20]  E. J. Foster,et al.  Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[21]  J. Putaux,et al.  Iα → Iβ transition of cellulose under ultrasonic radiation , 2013, Cellulose.

[22]  Akira Isogai,et al.  An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[23]  Ashlie Martini,et al.  Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[24]  Jinlong Yang,et al.  Density-Functional Theory Studies of Step-Kinked Carbon Nanotubes , 2011 .

[25]  V. Martorana,et al.  Branching in amyloid fibril growth. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[26]  J. Putaux,et al.  The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[27]  Z. Yaghoobi,et al.  Internal Damage of Crimped Lyocell Fiber , 2007 .

[28]  S. Iijima,et al.  Imaging active topological defects in carbon nanotubes. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[29]  Paul Langan,et al.  Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Ibeta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  Helbert,et al.  Molecular imaging of halocynthia papillosa cellulose , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[31]  Hiroyuki Yamamoto,et al.  Microstructural analysis of microfibrils of bacterial cellulose , 1997 .

[32]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Undirectional degradation of valonia cellulose microcrystals subjected to cellulase action , 1985 .

[33]  R. Manley.  Molecular morphology of cellulose , 1971 .

[34]  F. Morehead,et al.  Some hydrodynamic properties of neutral suspensions of cellulose crystallites as related to size and shape , 1961 .