Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma

Flow cytometry has become a highly valuable method to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) and evaluate the depth of complete response (CR) in bone marrow (BM) of multiple myeloma (MM) after therapy. However, current flow-MRD has lower sensitivity than molecular methods and lacks standardization. Here we report on a novel next generation flow (NGF) approach for highly sensitive and standardized MRD detection in MM. An optimized 2-tube 8-color antibody panel was constructed in five cycles of design-evaluation-redesign. In addition, a bulk-lysis procedure was established for acquisition of ⩾107 cells/sample, and novel software tools were constructed for automatic plasma cell gating. Multicenter evaluation of 110 follow-up BM from MM patients in very good partial response (VGPR) or CR showed a higher sensitivity for NGF-MRD vs conventional 8-color flow-MRD -MRD-positive rate of 47 vs 34% (P=0.003)-. Thus, 25% of patients classified as MRD-negative by conventional 8-color flow were MRD-positive by NGF, translating into a significantly longer progression-free survival for MRD-negative vs MRD-positive CR patients by NGF (75% progression-free survival not reached vs 7 months; P=0.02). This study establishes EuroFlow-based NGF as a highly sensitive, fully standardized approach for MRD detection in MM which overcomes the major limitations of conventional flow-MRD methods and is ready for implementation in routine diagnostics.

[1]  L. Escoda,et al.  Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  E. Ocio,et al.  Treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in 2015. , 2015, Blood reviews.

[3]  D. Royston,et al.  Single-Tube 10-Fluorochrome Analysis for Efficient Flow Cytometric Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Plasma Cell Myeloma. , 2016, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  M. Boccadoro,et al.  Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: updated follow-up and improved survival. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  A. Palumbo,et al.  Next-generation sequencing and real-time quantitative PCR for minimal residual disease detection in B-cell disorders , 2014, Leukemia.

[6]  M. Stetler-Stevenson,et al.  Myeloma minimal residual disease testing in the United States: Evidence of improved standardization , 2016, American journal of hematology.

[7]  E S Costa,et al.  A probabilistic approach for the evaluation of minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry in leukemic B‐cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[8]  A. Lesokhin,et al.  Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: bringing the bench to the bedside , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[9]  W. Lewis,et al.  Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. , 2008, American family physician.

[10]  N. Puig,et al.  Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry , 2014, Leukemia.

[11]  G. Morgan,et al.  Minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry in multiple myeloma: impact on outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Brent L Wood,et al.  Principles of minimal residual disease detection for hematopoietic neoplasms by flow cytometry , 2016, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[13]  B. Paiva,et al.  Consensus guidelines on plasma cell myeloma minimal residual disease analysis and reporting , 2016, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[14]  G. Morgan,et al.  Minimal residual disease in myeloma by flow cytometry: independent prediction of survival benefit per log reduction. , 2015, Blood.

[15]  J. Shah,et al.  New drugs and novel mechanisms of action in multiple myeloma in 2013: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) , 2014, Leukemia.

[16]  M. Stetler-Stevenson,et al.  Minimal residual disease testing in multiple myeloma by flow cytometry: major heterogeneity. , 2013, Blood.

[17]  A. Palumbo,et al.  Initial treatment of transplant-ineligible patients in multiple myeloma , 2014, Expert review of hematology.

[18]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Improvement in long-term outcomes with successive Total Therapy trials for multiple myeloma: are patients now being cured? , 2013, Leukemia.

[19]  R. de Tute,et al.  Measuring disease levels in myeloma using flow cytometry in combination with other laboratory techniques: Lessons from the past 20 years at the Leeds Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service , 2016, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[20]  A. Órfão,et al.  Minimal residual disease monitoring and immune profiling in multiple myeloma in elderly patients. , 2016, Blood.

[21]  A. Órfão,et al.  Utility of CD54, CD229, and CD319 for the identification of plasma cells in patients with clonal plasma cell diseases , 2016, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[22]  A. Órfão,et al.  Comparison of immunofixation, serum free light chain, and immunophenotyping for response evaluation and prognostication in multiple myeloma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Marina Ruggeri,et al.  Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders , 2008, Haematologica.

[24]  O. Cope,et al.  Multiple myeloma. , 1948, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  E. Colado,et al.  Multiparameter flow cytometry for staging of solitary bone plasmacytoma: new criteria for risk of progression to myeloma. , 2014, Blood.

[26]  N. Puig,et al.  Is This the Time to Introduce Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Practice? , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  N. Puig,et al.  Kappa deleting element as an alternative molecular target for minimal residual disease assessment by real‐time quantitative PCR in patients with multiple myeloma , 2012, European journal of haematology.

[28]  M Hummel,et al.  Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: Report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936 , 2003, Leukemia.

[29]  A Orfao,et al.  EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes , 2012, Leukemia.

[30]  A. Órfão,et al.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. , 2015, Blood.

[31]  Alberto Orfao,et al.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies. , 2015, Blood.

[32]  H. Maecker,et al.  Selecting fluorochrome conjugates for maximum sensitivity , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[33]  C. E. Pedreira,et al.  Generation of flow cytometry data files with a potentially infinite number of dimensions , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[34]  T. Cedena,et al.  Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. , 2014, Blood.

[35]  C. Chim,et al.  High applicability of ASO-RQPCR for detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma by entirely patient-specific primers/probes , 2016, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[36]  A. Palumbo,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma: current status and future perspectives , 2015, Leukemia.

[37]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[38]  A. Órfão,et al.  Consensus guidelines for myeloma minimal residual disease sample staining and data acquisition , 2016, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[39]  M. Béné,et al.  A single-tube multiparameter seven-colour flow cytometry strategy for the detection of malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma , 2013, Blood Cancer Journal.

[40]  P. Mäntymaa,et al.  Comparative analysis of minimal residual disease detection by multiparameter flow cytometry and enhanced ASO RQ-PCR in multiple myeloma , 2014, Blood Cancer Journal.

[41]  M. Stetler-Stevenson,et al.  Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach , 2016, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[42]  M. Terol,et al.  High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. , 2012, Blood.

[43]  D. Esseltine,et al.  Bortezomib-based versus nonbortezomib-based induction treatment before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized, controlled trials. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  Marcos González,et al.  Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: a comparison between allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. , 2005, Haematologica.

[45]  A. Órfão,et al.  Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma , 2016, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[46]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Complete response correlates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients. , 2011, Blood.

[47]  N. Munshi,et al.  Deep Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Critical Review , 2015, BioMed research international.

[48]  G. Morgan,et al.  Flow cytometric disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: the relationship between normal and neoplastic plasma cells predicts outcome after transplantation. , 2002, Blood.

[49]  J. Besalduch,et al.  Clinical applicability and prognostic significance of molecular response assessed by fluorescent‐PCR of immunoglobulin genes in multiple myeloma. Results from a GEM/PETHEMA study , 2013, British journal of haematology.

[50]  S. Lonial,et al.  Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma , 2013, Leukemia.

[51]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Curing myeloma at last: defining criteria and providing the evidence. , 2014, Blood.

[52]  Alberto Orfao,et al.  Overview of clinical flow cytometry data analysis: recent advances and future challenges. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[53]  P. Richardson,et al.  Promising therapies in multiple myeloma. , 2015, Blood.

[54]  J. Gribben,et al.  Real-Time polymerase chain reaction of immunoglobulin rearrangements for quantitative evaluation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. , 2000, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[55]  T. Kalina,et al.  EuroFlow standardization of flow cytometer instrument settings and immunophenotyping protocols , 2012, Leukemia.