National cohort study comparing severe medium‐term urinary complications after robot‐assisted vs laparoscopic vs retropubic open radical prostatectomy

To evaluate the occurrence of severe urinary complications within 2 years of surgery in men undergoing either robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) or retropubic open radical prostatectomy (ORP).

[1]  Steven L. Chang,et al.  Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy. , 2017, European urology focus.

[2]  Jim C Hu,et al.  Cost of New Technologies in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy, and Proton Beam Therapy. , 2017, European urology.

[3]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Quantifying severe urinary complications after radical prostatectomy: the development and validation of a surgical performance indicator using hospital administrative data , 2017, BJU international.

[4]  P. Stattin,et al.  Long‐term adverse effects after retropubic and robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. Nationwide, population‐based study , 2017, Journal of surgical oncology.

[5]  Steven L. Chang,et al.  Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database. , 2016, European urology.

[6]  Robert A Gardiner,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study , 2016, The Lancet.

[7]  Fouad Aoun,et al.  The Single-Knot Running Vesicourethral Anastomosis after Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy: Review of the Technique and Its Modifications, Tips, and Pitfalls , 2016, Prostate cancer.

[8]  R. Saskin,et al.  Effect of radical prostatectomy surgeon volume on complication rates from a large population-based cohort. , 2016, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[9]  D. Cromwell,et al.  Socioeconomic deprivation and inpatient complication rates following mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery , 2015, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  Stacey A. Kenfield,et al.  Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. , 2015, European Urology.

[11]  Steven L. Chang,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Communities,et al.  English Indices of Deprivation , 2013 .

[13]  M. Remzi,et al.  Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. , 2012, European urology.

[14]  J. Eastham,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[15]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[16]  Jens Hansen,et al.  Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. , 2012, European urology.

[17]  P. Ziprin,et al.  Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. , 2012, Journal of public health.

[18]  Sam S. Chang,et al.  Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. , 2010, Urologic oncology.

[19]  J. van der Meulen,et al.  Identifying co‐morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[20]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. , 2009, JAMA.

[21]  B. Rocco,et al.  Anatomical reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter after radical prostatectomy , 2009, BJU international.

[22]  M. Menon,et al.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. , 2009, European urology.

[23]  G. Hillis,et al.  Socio-economic status and early outcome from coronary artery bypass grafting , 2009, Heart.

[24]  M. Blute,et al.  Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot‐assisted techniques , 2009, BJU international.

[25]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Urology.

[26]  Jim C Hu,et al.  Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[27]  J. Joseph,et al.  Robot‐assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? , 2005, BJU international.

[28]  V. Protogerou,et al.  Vesicourethral Anastomotic Strictures after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: The Experience of a Single Institution , 2004, Urologia Internationalis.

[29]  S. Mehta,et al.  Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  P. Walsh.  Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. , 1998, The Journal of urology.