Understanding the role of dip-coating process parameters in the mechanical performance of polymer-coated bioglass robocast scaffolds.

The effect of different dip-coating variables-solvent, deposition temperature and polymer concentration-on the mechanical performance of polycaprolactone-coated 45S5 bioglass robocast scaffolds is systematically analyzed in this work. The reproducible geometry of the scaffolds produced by this additive manufacturing technique makes them an optimal model system and facilitates the analysis. The results suggest that the mechanical performance of the hybrid scaffolds is improved monotonically with polymer concentration, but this concentration cannot be increased indefinitely if the macroporosity interconnectivity, and thus the scaffold׳s capacity to promote tissue ingrowth, are to be preserved. An optimal concentration, and therefore viscosity (~1-4Pas in the present case), exists for any given set of process variables (scaffold geometry and material, polymer, solvent and process temperature) that yields coatings with optimal reinforcement and minimal reduction of scaffold functionality. Solvent and process temperature do not directly affect the strengthening provided by the polymeric coating. However they can determine the maximum concentration at the critical viscosity, and thereby the maximum achievable mechanical performance of the resulting hybrid scaffold.

[1]  Yoshito Ikada,et al.  Challenges in tissue engineering , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Fernando Guiberteau,et al.  Improving the compressive strength of bioceramic robocast scaffolds by polymer infiltration. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  Delbert E Day,et al.  Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[5]  D. Brauer Bioactive glasses—structure and properties. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  The pro-angiogenic properties of multi-functional bioactive glass composite scaffolds. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[7]  P. Miranda,et al.  Effect of Polymer Infiltration on the Flexural Behavior of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Robocast Scaffolds , 2014, Materials.

[8]  Amy J Wagoner Johnson,et al.  Multiscale osteointegration as a new paradigm for the design of calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[9]  P. Miranda,et al.  Impregnation of β-tricalcium phosphate robocast scaffolds by in situ polymerization. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[10]  P. Miranda,et al.  Improving mechanical properties of 13–93 bioactive glass robocast scaffold by poly (lactic acid) and poly (ε-caprolactone) melt infiltration , 2016 .

[11]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Direct ink writing of highly porous and strong glass scaffolds for load-bearing bone defects repair and regeneration. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[12]  A. M. Deliormanlı,et al.  Direct-write assembly of silicate and borate bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair , 2012 .

[13]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[14]  Niko Moritz,et al.  Mechanical verification of soft-tissue attachment on bioactive glasses and titanium implants. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  Jonathan C Knowles,et al.  Hydroxyapatite/poly(epsilon-caprolactone) composite coatings on hydroxyapatite porous bone scaffold for drug delivery. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[16]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[17]  Oana Bretcanu,et al.  Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds , 2008 .

[18]  Fernando Guiberteau,et al.  Influence of sintering temperature on the mechanical properties of ϵ-PCL-impregnated 45S5 bioglass-derived scaffolds fabricated by robocasting , 2015 .

[19]  P. Dubois,et al.  Bone‐guided regeneration: from inert biomaterials to bioactive polymer (nano)composites , 2011 .

[20]  Pedro Miranda,et al.  Effect of milling media on processing and performance of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds fabricated by robocasting , 2015 .

[21]  E B Giesen,et al.  Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Francesco Baino,et al.  Bioactive glasses: special applications outside the skeletal system , 2016 .

[23]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. , 2011, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[24]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Bi-layered porous constructs of PCL-coated 45S5 bioactive glass and electrospun collagen-PCL fibers , 2015, Journal of Porous Materials.

[25]  L L Hench,et al.  Effect of crystallization on apatite-layer formation of bioactive glass 45S5. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Tough, Bio-Inspired Hybrid Materials , 2008, Science.

[27]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Sintering, crystallisation and biodegradation behaviour of Bioglass-derived glass-ceramics. , 2007, Faraday discussions.

[28]  A R Boccaccini,et al.  Development and in vitro characterisation of novel bioresorbable and bioactive composite materials based on polylactide foams and Bioglass for tissue engineering applications. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[29]  José M.F. Ferreira,et al.  A simple recipe for direct writing complex 45S5 Bioglass® 3D scaffolds , 2013 .

[30]  Amit Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2012, Trends in biotechnology.

[31]  P. Miranda,et al.  Poly-(lactic acid) infiltration of 45S5 Bioglass® robocast scaffolds: Chemical interaction and its deleterious effect in mechanical enhancement , 2016 .

[32]  Francesco Baino,et al.  Mechanical properties and reliability of glass–ceramic foam scaffolds for bone repair , 2014 .

[33]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Assessment of cancellous bone mechanical properties from micro-FE models based on micro-CT, pQCT and MR images. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[34]  Laurent Chazeau,et al.  Toughening of bio-ceramics scaffolds by polymer coating , 2007 .

[35]  P. Miranda,et al.  Reinforcing bioceramic scaffolds with in situ synthesized ε-polycaprolactone coatings. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[36]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  PDLLA/Bioglass composites for soft-tissue and hard-tissue engineering: an in vitro cell biology assessment. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[37]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Designing highly toughened hybrid composites through nature-inspired hierarchical complexity , 2009 .

[38]  Enrica Verne,et al.  Biodegradable polymer coated 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2007 .

[39]  F. Baino,et al.  Feasibility, tailoring and properties of polyurethane/bioactive glass composite scaffolds for tissue engineering , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[40]  Francesco Baino,et al.  Optimization of composition, structure and mechanical strength of bioactive 3-D glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone substitution , 2013, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[41]  José M.F. Ferreira,et al.  Robocasting of 45S5 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2014 .

[42]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Non-crystalline composite tissue engineering scaffolds using boron-containing bioactive glass and poly(d,l-lactic acid) coatings , 2009, Biomedical materials.

[43]  Furqan A. Shah,et al.  Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2018 .

[44]  G. Hilmas,et al.  Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[45]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials , 1971 .

[46]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Toughening and functionalization of bioactive ceramic and glass bone scaffolds by biopolymer coatings and infiltration: a review of the last 5 years , 2015, Expert review of medical devices.

[47]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of poly(ε-caprolactone)-infiltrated biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds with bimodal pore distribution. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[48]  A R Boccaccini,et al.  Mechanical properties of highly porous PDLLA/Bioglass composite foams as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[49]  J. Weng,et al.  The influence of polymer concentrations on the structure and mechanical properties of porous polycaprolactone-coated hydroxyapatite scaffolds , 2010 .