Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives
暂无分享,去创建一个
Neville A. Stanton | Natasha Merat | Riender Happee | Thomas B. Sheridan | Marieke Martens | Shuchisnigdha Deb | Marjan Hagenzieker | Martin Baumann | Jonas Bärgman | Joost de Winter | Azra Habibovic | Colleen Emmenegger | Josef Krems | Wilbert Tabone | Claudia Ackermann | P.A. Hancock | John D. Lee | Don Norman | P. Hancock | T. Sheridan | J. Bärgman | J. D. Winter | Azra Habibovic | M. Hagenzieker | J. Krems | N. Stanton | M. Baumann | R. Happee | N. Merat | S. Deb | Don Norman | Wilbert Tabone | Brady Michael Kuhl | Colleen Emmenegger | Claudia Ackermann | Jonas Bärgman
[1] John D. Lee,et al. Augmented Reality Cues and Elderly Driver Hazard Perception , 2013, Hum. Factors.
[2] Ronald Azuma,et al. A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.
[3] D. W. F. van Krevelen,et al. A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations , 2010, Int. J. Virtual Real..
[4] Riender Happee,et al. Passenger opinions of the perceived safety and interaction with automated shuttles: A test ride study with ‘hidden’ safety steward , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[5] Julia Fink,et al. Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction , 2012, ICSR.
[6] Klaus Bengler,et al. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests , 2018, Hum. Factors.
[7] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. Survey on eHMI concepts: The effect of text, color, and perspective , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[8] Avinoam Borowsky,et al. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Human-Like Driving Policies in Collision Avoidance Tasks of Self-Driving Cars , 2020, ArXiv.
[9] Hermann Winner,et al. Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems: Review and Future Perspectives , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.
[10] Catherine M. Burns,et al. Autonomous Driving in the Real World: Experiences with Tesla Autopilot and Summon , 2016, AutomotiveUI.
[11] Lesley Strawderman,et al. Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.
[12] W. Haddon,et al. On the escape of tigers: an ecologic note. , 1970, American journal of public health and the nation's health.
[13] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. Adaptive automation: automatically (dis)engaging automation during visually distracted driving , 2018, PeerJ Comput. Sci..
[14] Klaus Bengler,et al. Virtually the same? Analysing pedestrian behaviour by means of virtual reality , 2020 .
[15] John Dixon,et al. The Design of Future Things , 2010 .
[16] Neville A. Stanton,et al. Take-Over Time in Highly Automated Vehicles , 2018, Driver Reactions to Automated Vehicles.
[17] Alexandra Neukum,et al. Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[18] Julio A. Sanguesa,et al. Advances in smart roads for future smart cities , 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society A.
[19] Johan F. Hoorn,et al. Distributed cognition , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[20] Takeo Igarashi,et al. Eyes on a Car: an Interface Design for Communication between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[21] Oliver M. J. Carsten,et al. How can humans understand their automated cars? HMI principles, problems and solutions , 2019, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[22] Stephen M. Casner,et al. The challenges of partially automated driving , 2016, Commun. ACM.
[23] Alois Ferscha,et al. Augmented reality navigation systems , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.
[24] Jochen Seitz,et al. Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication for Vulnerable Road Users: Survey, Design Considerations, and Challenges , 2019, Sensors.
[25] Yuxi Li,et al. Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2018, Reinforcement Learning for Cyber-Physical Systems.
[26] Alex Fridman,et al. To Walk or Not to Walk: Crowdsourced Assessment of External Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Displays , 2017, ArXiv.
[27] Malcolm Skinner,et al. Dictionary of Geography , 1999 .
[28] Natasha Merat,et al. Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations , 2018, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[29] Kathrin Zeeb,et al. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[30] Neville A. Stanton,et al. Turing in the driver's seat: Can people distinguish between automated and manually driven vehicles? , 2020, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries.
[31] Wilbert Tabone. The Effectiveness of an Augmented Reality Guiding System in an Art Museum , 2020 .
[32] Hans-Peter Schöner,et al. The Behavioral Validity of Dual-Task Driving Performance in Fixed and Moving Base Driving Simulators , 2016 .
[33] Natasha Merat,et al. Testing external HMI designs for automated vehicles – An overview on user study results from the EU project interact , 2019 .
[34] Lin Wang,et al. Ready to bully automated vehicles on public roads? , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[35] Susan Mayhew,et al. A Dictionary of Geography , 1997 .
[36] P A Hancock,et al. The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality as Training Enhancement Methods: A Meta-Analysis , 2020, Hum. Factors.
[37] Rikard Fredriksson,et al. Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians , 2018, Front. Psychol..
[38] Matthias Beggiato,et al. An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? , 2019, Applied ergonomics.
[39] Shancang Li,et al. 5G Internet of Things: A survey , 2018, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..
[40] Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al. What Will 5G Be? , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.
[41] Neville A. Stanton,et al. Distributed Cognition on the road: Using EAST to explore future road transportation systems. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.
[42] Y. B. Eisma,et al. External Human-Machine Interfaces: The Effect of Display Location on Crossing Intentions and Eye Movements , 2019, Inf..
[43] Malte Risto,et al. The social behavior of autonomous vehicles , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.
[44] Jacques M. B. Terken,et al. Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles: Roles of Explicit and Implicit Communication , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[45] Thomas B. Sheridan,et al. A critique of the SAE conditional driving automation definition, and analyses of options for improvement , 2018, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[46] Martin Baumann,et al. A Longitudinal Video Study on Communicating Status and Intent for Self-Driving Vehicle Pedestrian Interaction , 2020, CHI.
[47] Yuzhong Shen,et al. AR-PED: A framework of augmented reality enabled pedestrian-in-the-loop simulation , 2019, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.
[48] Joshua E. Domeyer,et al. Vehicle Automation–Other Road User Communication and Coordination: Theory and Mechanisms , 2020, IEEE Access.
[49] Melissa Cefkin,et al. Multi-methods Research to Examine External HMI for Highly Automated Vehicles , 2019, HCI.
[50] Yao-Ting Sung,et al. Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum , 2014, Comput. Educ..
[51] Martin Baumann,et al. Light-Based External Human Machine Interface: Color Evaluation for Self-Driving Vehicle and Pedestrian Interaction , 2019, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
[52] Paul C. Schutte,et al. The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction , 2005 .
[53] Adam Millard-Ball,et al. Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities , 2016 .
[54] Araz Taeihagh,et al. Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks , 2018, Transport Reviews.
[55] Natasha Merat,et al. Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic , 2020 .
[56] Joan Severson,et al. Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[57] Neville A. Stanton,et al. Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: Hands and feet free but not 'mind' free driving , 2014 .
[58] Muztaba Fuad,et al. Comparison of Child and Adult Pedestrian Perspectives of External Features on Autonomous Vehicles Using Virtual Reality Experiment , 2019, AHFE.
[59] Natasha Merat,et al. What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[60] Don Norman,et al. The challenges of automation in the automobile , 2019, Ergonomics.
[61] Marjan Hagenzieker,et al. Automated bus systems in Europe: A systematic review of passenger experience and road user interaction , 2020 .
[62] J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .
[63] Brian R. Duffy,et al. Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..
[64] Wendy Ju,et al. Emergency, Automation Off: Unstructured Transition Timing for Distracted Drivers of Automated Vehicles , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[65] R. Ross,et al. Position Statement Identification and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk in Canada: A Position Paper by the Cardiometabolic Risk Working Group (Executive Summary) , 2011 .
[66] Ji Hyun Yang,et al. Takeover Requests in Simulated Partially Autonomous Vehicles Considering Human Factors , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.
[67] R. Happee,et al. A human factors perspective on automated driving , 2017 .
[68] Lorenz Prasch,et al. Analyzing Pedestrian Behavior in Augmented Reality — Proof of Concept , 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).
[69] Sally A. Applin,et al. Extending Driver-Vehicle Interface Research Into the Mobile Device Commons : Transitioning to (nondriving) passengers and their vehicles. , 2015, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.
[70] David Sirkin,et al. The Case for Implicit External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[71] Klaus Bengler,et al. Comparison of Methods to Evaluate the Influence of an Automated Vehicle's Driving Behavior on Pedestrians: Wizard of Oz, Virtual Reality, and Video , 2020, Inf..
[72] Donald A. Norman,et al. Turn Signals Are The Facial Expressions Of Automobiles , 1992 .
[73] P. Hancock. Driving Into the Future , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.
[74] Keiichi Uchimura,et al. Driver Inattention Monitoring System for Intelligent Vehicles: A Review , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[75] P. Delrio,et al. Achieving high quality standards in laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: A Delphi consensus-based position paper. , 2018, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[76] Thomas B. Sheridan,et al. Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .
[77] Florian Alt,et al. A Design Space for External Displays on Cars , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[78] Klaus Bengler,et al. Pedestrian simulators for traffic research: State of the art and future of a motion lab , 2018 .
[79] Victoria A Banks,et al. Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.
[80] M. Hannan,et al. 2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support , 2019, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[81] Federico Manuri,et al. A Survey on Applications of Augmented Reality , 2016 .
[82] Bastian Pfleging,et al. Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band eHMI in Interactions Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2020, CHI.
[83] Sowmya Somanath,et al. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.
[84] Jonas Bärgman,et al. Holistic assessment of driver assistance systems: how can systems be assessed with respect to how they impact glance behaviour and collision avoidance? , 2020 .
[85] Fabian Kröger,et al. Automated Driving in Its Social, Historical and Cultural Contexts , 2016 .
[86] Stewart A. Birrell,et al. Driving Style: How Should an Automated Vehicle Behave? , 2019, Inf..
[87] Albrecht Schmidt,et al. Implicit human computer interaction through context , 2000, Personal Technologies.
[88] Philipp Wintersberger,et al. Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles' external human-machine interfaces , 2020, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives.
[89] Håkan Alm,et al. External Human–Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work , 2019, Front. Psychol..
[90] Neville A. Stanton,et al. Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.
[91] Mark Mulder,et al. Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[92] Mark S. Young,et al. Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control , 1997 .
[93] Claudia,et al. Vehicle Movement and its Potential as Implicit Communication Signal for Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles , 2022 .
[94] Yee Mun Lee,et al. External Human–Machine Interfaces Can Be Misleading: An Examination of Trust Development and Misuse in a CAVE-Based Pedestrian Simulation Environment , 2020, Hum. Factors.