Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Patrick M M Bossuyt | Jacobus van der Velden | Jaap Stoker | Shandra Bipat | Afina S Glas | A. Zwinderman | P. Bossuyt | A. Glas | J. Stoker | S. Bipat | Aeilko H Zwinderman | J. van der Velden | J. Stoker
[1] Theo Stijnen,et al. Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[2] F M Corl,et al. CT evaluation of cervical cancer: spectrum of disease. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[3] Jonathan J Deeks,et al. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. , 2001, BMJ.
[4] S. Ascher,et al. Staging of Gynecologic Malignancies , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.
[5] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Systematic Reviews in Health Care , 2001 .
[6] N. deSouza,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site in stage I cervical carcinoma: A comparison of endovaginal coil with external phased array coil techniques at 0.5T , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[7] L Arrivé,et al. A scale of methodological quality for clinical studies of radiologic examinations. , 2000, Radiology.
[8] Chang Cy,et al. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed.
[9] M. Hirokawa,et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in early cervical cancer. , 2000, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.
[10] T. Cheung,et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[11] M. Gutberlet,et al. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results. , 2000, Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie.
[12] M. Zeegers,et al. [Practice of systematic reviews. VI. Searching, selection and methodological evaluation of etiological research]. , 2000, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.
[13] P D Bezemer,et al. Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[14] P. Bossuyt,et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.
[15] L. Bouter,et al. De praktijk van systematische reviews. III. Methodologische beoordeling van onderzoeken , 1999 .
[16] L. Bouter,et al. De praktijk van systematische reviews: II Zoeken en selecteren van literatuur , 1999 .
[17] Y. Yamashita,et al. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix , 1998 .
[18] M R Segal,et al. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. , 1997, JAMA.
[19] A. Jadad,et al. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[20] H. Hricak,et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. , 1996, Radiology.
[21] H. Hricak,et al. Cervical Carcinoma: Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Staging , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[22] P Glasziou,et al. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[23] H C Van Houwelingen,et al. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.
[24] L E Moses,et al. Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting Reports , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[25] L E Moses,et al. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.
[26] D. Botsis,et al. The value of computed tomography in staging cervical carcinoma , 1988, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[27] D. Rubens,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic correlation in stage IB cervix cancers. , 1987, Gynecologic oncology.
[28] R J Panzer,et al. Workup Bias in Prediction Research , 1987, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[29] M. Morino,et al. Lymph nodal metastases and the clinical stage of cervix carcinoma. , 1987, European journal of gynaecological oncology.
[30] P. Silverman,et al. Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Extrapelvic Lymphadenopathy in Carcinoma of the Cervix , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[31] Y. Tanaka,et al. Relationship between lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients irradiated postoperatively for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1984, Acta radiologica. Oncology.
[32] L. Lagasse,et al. Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. , 1980, Gynecologic oncology.
[33] A. Feinstein,et al. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.
[34] W. Hoskins,et al. Staging of cervical cancer. , 1975, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.
[35] J. van Nagell,et al. The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findinges. , 1971, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.