Relevance of climatological background error statistics for mesoscale data assimilation

Abstract The relevance of climatological background error statistics for mesoscale data assimilation has been investigated with regard to basic assumptions and also with regard to the ensemble generation techniques that are applied to derive the statistics. It is found that background error statistics derived by simulation through Ensemble Data Assimilation are more realistic than the corresponding statistics derived by downscaling from larger scale ensemble data. In case perturbation of observations is used to inject a spread into the ensemble, and the ensemble is integrated over a few hours only, it was found that the derived structure functions may be contaminated by the geometry of the observing network. The effects of the assumptions of stationarity, homogeneity and isotropy, that are generally applied in the generation of background error statistics, and the implications of the background error covariance model have also been illustrated. Spatial covariances derived under these assumptions were contrasted against spatial covariances obtained by ensemble averaging only, preserving the signals from forecast errors of the day. This indicates that it is likely to be favourable to apply data assimilation with ensemble background error statistics obtained from ensemble averaging, like in ensemble Kalman filters or in hybrids between variational and ensemble data assimilation techniques.

[1]  Pierre Bénard,et al.  Integration of the fully elastic equations cast in the hydrostatic pressure terrain-following coordinate in the framework of the ARPEGE/Aladin NWP system , 1995 .

[2]  R. Frehlich,et al.  Estimates of Turbulence from Numerical Weather Prediction Model Output with Applications to Turbulence Diagnosis and Data Assimilation , 2004 .

[3]  John Derber,et al.  The National Meteorological Center's spectral-statistical interpolation analysis system , 1992 .

[4]  Nils Gustafsson,et al.  Survey of data assimilation methods for convective‐scale numerical weather prediction at operational centres , 2018 .

[5]  Jan Erik Haugen,et al.  A Spectral Limited-Area Model Formulation with Time-dependent Boundary Conditions Applied to the Shallow-Water Equations , 1993 .

[6]  G. D. Nastrom,et al.  A Climatology of Atmospheric Wavenumber Spectra of Wind and Temperature Observed by Commercial Aircraft , 1985 .

[7]  Stefan Gollvik,et al.  Mesan, an operational mesoscale analysis system , 2000 .

[8]  Stefan Gollvik,et al.  Mesan, an operational mesoscale analysis system , 2000 .

[9]  L. Berre Estimation of Synoptic and Mesoscale Forecast Error Covariances in a Limited-Area Model , 2000 .

[10]  E. Lindborg Can the atmospheric kinetic energy spectrum be explained by two-dimensional turbulence? , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Nils Gustafsson,et al.  Four-dimensional ensemble variational (4D-En-Var) data assimilation for the HIgh Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM) , 2014 .

[12]  V. Masson,et al.  The AROME-France Convective-Scale Operational Model , 2011 .

[14]  S. Ştefănescu,et al.  An overview of the variational assimilation in the ALADIN/France numerical weather‐prediction system , 2005 .

[15]  Andrew C. Lorenc,et al.  A comparison of hybrid variational data assimilation methods for global NWP , 2018, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[16]  Lisa Bengtsson,et al.  The HARMONIE-AROME Model Configuration in the ALADIN-HIRLAM NWP System , 2017 .

[17]  Chris Snyder,et al.  Atmospheric Kinetic Energy Spectra from Global High-Resolution Nonhydrostatic Simulations , 2014 .