Effects of improved spatial and temporal modeling of on-road vehicle emissions

Numerous emission and air quality modeling studies have suggested the need to accurately characterize the spatial and temporal variations in on-road vehicle emissions. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact that using detailed traffic activity data has on emission estimates used to model air quality impacts. The on-road vehicle emissions are estimated by multiplying the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by the fleet-average emission factors determined by road link and hour of day. Changes in the fraction of VMT from heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDVs) can have a significant impact on estimated fleet-average emissions because the emission factors for HDDV nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) are much higher than those for light-duty gas vehicles (LDGVs). Through detailed road link-level on-road vehicle emission modeling, this work investigated two scenarios for better characterizing mobile source emissions: (1) improved spatial and temporal variation of vehicle type fractions, and (2) use of Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES2010) instead of MOBILE6 exhaust emission factors. Emissions were estimated for the Detroit and Atlanta metropolitan areas for summer and winter episodes. The VMT mix scenario demonstrated the importance of better characterizing HDDV activity by time of day, day of week, and road type. More HDDV activity occurs on restricted access road types on weekdays and at nonpeak times, compared to light-duty vehicles, resulting in 5–15% higher NOx and PM emission rates during the weekdays and 15–40% lower rates on weekend days. Use of MOVES2010 exhaust emission factors resulted in increases of more than 50% in NOx and PM for both HDDVs and LDGVs, relative to MOBILE6. Because LDGV PM emissions have been shown to increase with lower temperatures, the most dramatic increase from MOBILE6 to MOVES2010 emission rates occurred for PM2.5 from LDGVs that increased 500% during colder wintertime conditions found in Detroit, the northernmost city modeled. Implications: Air quality model performance relies partly on on-road mobile source emission inventories accurately allocated, both spatially and temporally. This work demonstrates the importance of characterizing the mix of heavy-duty diesel versus light-duty gasoline vehicle activity on an hourly basis on weekdays and weekends by road type. Incorporating detailed activity data increases weekday average NOx and PM emissions 5–15%, with early morning hour emission increases approaching 100%, compared to using one average vehicle activity mix. Application of the methodologies described in this paper will improve the accuracy of on-road emission inventories in the understanding of ozone photochemistry and PM formation.

[1]  D. Chock,et al.  Weekday-Weekend Pollutant Studies of the Los Angeles Basin , 1976 .

[2]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  The impact of speed post-processing methods on regional mobile emissions estimation , 2007 .

[3]  A. M. Dunker,et al.  Modeling Weekday/Weekend Ozone Differences in the Los Angeles Region for 1997 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Photochemistry of the "Sunday Effect" , 1977 .

[5]  P. T. Roberts,et al.  Weekday versus Weekend Activity Patterns for Ozone Precursor Emissions in California’s South Coast Air Basin , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[7]  Vlad Isakov,et al.  Resolving Local-Scale Emissions for Modeling Air Quality near Roadways , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  C. Blanchard,et al.  Differences between Weekday and Weekend Air Pollutant Levels in Southern California , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  Douglas R Lawson,et al.  Differences between Weekday and Weekend Air Pollutant Levels in Atlanta; Baltimore; Chicago; Dallas–Fort Worth; Denver; Houston; New York; Phoenix; Washington, DC; and Surrounding Areas , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  J. Heuss,et al.  Weekday/Weekend Ozone Differences: What Can We Learn from Them? , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  T. Keener,et al.  Evaluation of Ozone-Nitrogen Oxides-Volatile Organic Compound Sensitivity of Cincinnati, Ohio , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  Douglas R Lawson,et al.  Evolution of the Magnitude and Spatial Extent of the Weekend Ozone Effect in California’s South Coast Air Basin, 1981–2000 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  G. Yarwood,et al.  Impact of meteorology and anthropogenic emissions on the local and regional ozone weekend effect in Midwestern US , 2012 .

[14]  C. Blanchard,et al.  Weekday/Weekend Differences in Ambient Air Pollutant Concentrations in Atlanta and the Southeastern United States , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  A comparative analysis of using trip-based versus link-based traffic data for regional mobile source emissions estimation , 2007 .

[16]  K. Wilson,et al.  Photochemical air pollution: Weekend-weekday differences , 1977 .

[17]  Use of Travel Demand Model Data to Improve Inventories in Philadelphia , 2006 .

[18]  A. M. Dunker,et al.  Modeling weekday to weekend changes in emissions and ozone in the Los Angeles basin for 1997 and 2010 , 2008 .

[19]  Timothy R. Dallmann,et al.  Evaluation of mobile source emission trends in the United States , 2010 .

[20]  Linsey C Marr,et al.  Changes in motor vehicle emissions on diurnal to decadal time scales and effects on atmospheric composition. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Linsey C Marr,et al.  Modeling the effect of weekday-weekend differences in motor vehicle emissions on photochemical air pollution in central California. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.