Comparison of different model formulations for modelling future power systems with high shares of renewables – The Dispa-SET Balkans model

Abstract Power system’s operational flexibility represents its ability to respond to predicted or unexpected changes in generation and demand. Traditional policy and planning models usually do not consider the technical operating constraints directly responsible for its operational flexibility. Nevertheless, this capability becomes increasingly important with the integration of significant shares of renewables. Incorporating flexibility can significantly change optimal generation strategies, lower the total system costs and improve policy impact estimates. The goal of this research is to prove that, for computational efficiency reasons, it is useful to cluster some of the original units into larger ones. This process reduces the number of continuous and binary variables and can, in certain conditions, be performed without significant loss of accuracy. To this purpose the Dispa-SET unit commitment and power dispatch model which focuses on balancing and flexibility problems in the European grids has been applied to the Western Balkans power system. Various clustering methods are implemented and tested on the same dataset and validated against the “No clustering” formulation. “Per unit” aggregates very small or very flexible units into larger ones with averaged characteristics, ”Per typical unit” considers one typical power plant per technology; and ”Per technology” additionally simplifies the mathematical formulation by completely neglecting units flexibility capabilities. The results have shown that the difference between disaggregated and clustered approaches remains acceptable and for certain accuracy metrics falls within a 2% margin. This is especially true in case of highly interconnected regional systems with relatively high shares of hydro energy.

[1]  Xiang Liao,et al.  Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm , 2017 .

[2]  A. Dewulf Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation , 2013 .

[3]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Energy production cost minimization in a combined heat and power generation systems using cuckoo optimization algorithm , 2017 .

[4]  K. D. Bruin,et al.  Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives , 2009 .

[5]  Neil Hewitt,et al.  Estimating power plant start costs in cyclic operation , 2013 .

[6]  Gustav Resch,et al.  South East Europe electricity roadmap – modelling energy transition in the electricity sectors , 2018, Climate Policy.

[7]  Patrick Sullivan,et al.  System Integration of Wind and Solar Power in Integrated Assessment Models: A Cross-Model Evaluation of New Approaches , 2017 .

[8]  Zhile Yang,et al.  A novel parallel-series hybrid meta-heuristic method for solving a hybrid unit commitment problem , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  Iain Staffell,et al.  The importance of open data and software: Is energy research lagging behind? , 2017 .

[10]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technology cost learning (vol 204, pg 831, 2017) , 2017 .

[11]  Pio A. Aguirre,et al.  Unit Commitment Scheduling Including Transmission Constraints: a MILP Formulation , 2016 .

[12]  Jong-hyun Ryu,et al.  A long-term capacity expansion planning model for an electric power system integrating large-size renewable energy technologies , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[13]  Valentin Bertsch,et al.  Highly resolved optimal renewable allocation planning in power systems under consideration of dynamic grid topology , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  Chronological Time-Period Clustering for Optimal Capacity Expansion Planning With Storage , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  S. Iniyan,et al.  A review of climate change, mitigation and adaptation , 2012 .

[16]  Guangchao Geng,et al.  Hydro-Thermal-Wind Coordination in Day-Ahead Unit Commitment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Applicability of a Clustered Unit Commitment Model in Power System Modeling , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  R. Fernández-Blanco,et al.  Quantifying the water-power linkage on hydrothermal power systems: A Greek case study , 2017 .

[19]  I. A. Farhat,et al.  Optimization methods applied for solving the short-term hydrothermal coordination problem , 2009 .

[20]  Pio A. Aguirre,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment Problem including thermal and pumped storage units: An MILP formulation by the application of linear approximations techniques , 2018 .

[21]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data , 2016 .

[22]  Goran Krajačić,et al.  Applying the Dispa-SET Model to the Western Balkans Power System , 2017 .

[23]  L. Papageorgiou,et al.  An MILP formulation for the optimal management of microgrids with task interruptions , 2017 .

[24]  L. Myers,et al.  Spearman Correlation Coefficients, Differences between , 2004 .

[25]  Sylvain Quoilin,et al.  The joint effect of centralised cogeneration plants and thermal storage on the efficiency and cost of the power system , 2018 .

[26]  Bryan Palmintier,et al.  Heterogeneous unit clustering for efficient operational flexibility modeling , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[27]  James Merrick,et al.  Simulating Annual Variation in Load, Wind, and Solar by Representative Hour Selection , 2018, The Energy Journal.

[28]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output , 2016 .

[29]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Hidden power system inflexibilities imposed by traditional unit commitment formulations , 2017 .

[30]  Jinyu Wen,et al.  Modeling formulation and validation for accelerated simulation and flexibility assessment on large scale power systems under higher renewable penetrations , 2019, Applied Energy.

[31]  Nikolaos E. Koltsaklis,et al.  A multi-period, multi-regional generation expansion planning model incorporating unit commitment constraints , 2015 .

[32]  Claudio Gentile,et al.  A tight MIP formulation of the unit commitment problem with start-up and shut-down constraints , 2017, EURO J. Comput. Optim..

[33]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models , 2016 .

[34]  N. Kyriakis,et al.  Impact of the ambient temperature rise on the energy consumption for heating and cooling in residential buildings of Greece , 2010 .

[35]  Masatoshi Nakamura,et al.  Reliable Maintenance Scheduling of Pumps in Existing Thermal Power Stations , 1997 .

[36]  Victor Hinojosa,et al.  A computational comparison of 2 mathematical formulations to handle transmission network constraints in the unit commitment problem , 2017 .

[37]  F. Pietrapertosa,et al.  Climate change adaptation policies and plans: A survey in 11 South East European countries , 2018 .

[38]  Wouter Nijs,et al.  Addressing flexibility in energy system models , 2015 .

[39]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Clustering methods to find representative periods for the optimization of energy systems: An initial framework and comparison , 2019, Applied Energy.

[40]  Yan Xu,et al.  A novel projected two-binary-variable formulation for unit commitmentin power systems , 2017 .

[41]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review , 2017 .

[42]  Leszek Kasprzyk,et al.  Effects of binary variables in mixed integer linear programming based unit commitment in large-scale electricity markets , 2018 .

[43]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges , 2014 .

[44]  John E. Bistline,et al.  Turn Down for What? The Economic Value of Operational Flexibility in Electricity Markets , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[45]  Ismail El Kafazi,et al.  Optimization Strategy Considering Energy Storage Systems to Minimize Energy Production Cost of Power Systems , 2018 .

[46]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Representing Operational Flexibility in Generation Expansion Planning Through Convex Relaxation of Unit Commitment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[47]  Nikolaos E. Koltsaklis,et al.  State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review , 2018, Applied Energy.

[48]  Bryan Palmintier,et al.  Impact of operational flexibility on electricity generation planning with renewable and carbon targets , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).