Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change

BACKGROUND As global climate change accelerates, one of the most urgent tasks for the coming decades is to develop accurate predictions about biological responses to guide the effective protection of biodiversity. Predictive models in biology provide a means for scientists to project changes to species and ecosystems in response to disturbances such as climate change. Most current predictive models, however, exclude important biological mechanisms such as demography, dispersal, evolution, and species interactions. These biological mechanisms have been shown to be important in mediating past and present responses to climate change. Thus, current modeling efforts do not provide sufficiently accurate predictions. Despite the many complexities involved, biologists are rapidly developing tools that include the key biological processes needed to improve predictive accuracy. The biggest obstacle to applying these more realistic models is that the data needed to inform them are almost always missing. We suggest ways to fill this growing gap between model sophistication and information to predict and prevent the most damaging aspects of climate change for life on Earth. ADVANCES On the basis of empirical and theoretical evidence, we identify six biological mechanisms that commonly shape responses to climate change yet are too often missing from current predictive models: physiology; demography, life history, and phenology; species interactions; evolutionary potential and population differentiation; dispersal, colonization, and range dynamics; and responses to environmental variation. We prioritize the types of information needed to inform each of these mechanisms and suggest proxies for data that are missing or difficult to collect. We show that even for well-studied species, we often lack critical information that would be necessary to apply more realistic, mechanistic models. Consequently, data limitations likely override the potential gains in accuracy of more realistic models. Given the enormous challenge of collecting this detailed information on millions of species around the world, we highlight practical methods that promote the greatest gains in predictive accuracy. Trait-based approaches leverage sparse data to make more general inferences about unstudied species. Targeting species with high climate sensitivity and disproportionate ecological impact can yield important insights about future ecosystem change. Adaptive modeling schemes provide a means to target the most important data while simultaneously improving predictive accuracy. OUTLOOK Strategic collections of essential biological information will allow us to build generalizable insights that inform our broader ability to anticipate species’ responses to climate change and other human-caused disturbances. By increasing accuracy and making uncertainties explicit, scientists can deliver improved projections for biodiversity under climate change together with characterizations of uncertainty to support more informed decisions by policymakers and land managers. Toward this end, a globally coordinated effort to fill data gaps in advance of the growing climate-fueled biodiversity crisis offers substantial advantages in efficiency, coverage, and accuracy. Biologists can take advantage of the lessons learned from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s development, coordination, and integration of climate change projections. Climate and weather projections were greatly improved by incorporating important mechanisms and testing predictions against global weather station data. Biology can do the same. We need to adopt this meteorological approach to predicting biological responses to climate change to enhance our ability to mitigate future changes to global biodiversity and the services it provides to humans. Emerging models are beginning to incorporate six key biological mechanisms that can improve predictions of biological responses to climate change. Models that include biological mechanisms have been used to project (clockwise from top) the evolution of disease-harboring mosquitoes, future environments and land use, physiological responses of invasive species such as cane toads, demographic responses of penguins to future climates, climate-dependent dispersal behavior in butterflies, and mismatched interactions between butterflies and their host plants. Despite these modeling advances, we seldom have the detailed data needed to build these models, necessitating new efforts to collect the relevant data to parameterize more biologically realistic predictive models. New biological models are incorporating the realistic processes underlying biological responses to climate change and other human-caused disturbances. However, these more realistic models require detailed information, which is lacking for most species on Earth. Current monitoring efforts mainly document changes in biodiversity, rather than collecting the mechanistic data needed to predict future changes. We describe and prioritize the biological information needed to inform more realistic projections of species’ responses to climate change. We also highlight how trait-based approaches and adaptive modeling can leverage sparse data to make broader predictions. We outline a global effort to collect the data necessary to better understand, anticipate, and reduce the damaging effects of climate change on biodiversity.

[1]  R. Adams The Problem and the Evidence , 2017 .

[2]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Benchmarking novel approaches for modelling species range dynamics , 2016, Global change biology.

[3]  Greta Bocedi,et al.  A trait‐based approach for predicting species responses to environmental change from sparse data: how well might terrestrial mammals track climate change? , 2016, Global change biology.

[4]  Florian Hartig,et al.  Community dynamics under environmental change: How can next generation mechanistic models improve projections of species distributions? , 2016 .

[5]  Jeffrey A. Cardille,et al.  Multipurpose habitat networks for short‐range and long‐range connectivity: a new method combining graph and circuit connectivity , 2016 .

[6]  Ç. Tavşanoğlu Ecology of climate change — the importance of biotic interactions , 2015, Folia Zoologica.

[7]  R. Julliard,et al.  REVIEW: Predictive ecology in a changing world , 2015 .

[8]  M. C. Urban Accelerating extinction risk from climate change , 2015, Science.

[9]  Daniel E. Schindler,et al.  Prediction, precaution, and policy under global change , 2015, Science.

[10]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  The ecological forecast horizon, and examples of its uses and determinants , 2015, bioRxiv.

[11]  R. Julliard,et al.  Predictive ecology in a changing world , 2015 .

[12]  C. Parmesan,et al.  Endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly and climate change: Short-term success but long-term vulnerability? , 2015, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[13]  F. Weissing,et al.  Evolutionary tipping points in the capacity to adapt to environmental change , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Applying evolutionary biology to address global challenges , 2014, Science.

[15]  David Murray-Rust,et al.  Combining agent functional types, capitals and services to model land use dynamics , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Greta Bocedi,et al.  RangeShifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco‐evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes , 2014 .

[17]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change , 2014 .

[18]  Andrew P Hendry,et al.  Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence , 2014, Evolutionary applications.

[19]  F. Burel,et al.  Interactive effects of landscape and weather on dispersal , 2013 .

[20]  R. Kotter,et al.  Ecology of climate change: the importance of biotic interactions , 2013 .

[21]  Greta Bocedi,et al.  Effects of local adaptation and interspecific competition on species’ responses to climate change , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  P. Zarnetske,et al.  Moving forward: dispersal and species interactions determine biotic responses to climate change , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[24]  Stephen Emmott,et al.  Ecosystems: Time to model all life on Earth , 2013, Nature.

[25]  Matthew E. Aiello‐Lammens,et al.  How does climate change cause extinction? , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  The push and pull of climate change causes heterogeneous shifts in avian elevational ranges , 2012 .

[27]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Eco-evolutionary responses of biodiversity to climate change , 2012 .

[28]  C. Plutzar,et al.  Extinction debt of high-mountain plants under twenty-first-century climate change , 2012 .

[29]  L. Kruuk,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION: EMPIRICAL APPLICATION OF THE SECONDARY THEOREM OF SELECTION AND COMPARISON TO THE BREEDER’S EQUATION , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  David K. Skelly,et al.  Biotic Multipliers of Climate Change , 2012, Science.

[31]  Kimberly S. Sheldon,et al.  On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Carrie A. Schloss,et al.  Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  B. Otto‐Bliesner,et al.  No‐analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late quaternary: implications for 21st‐century predictions by species distribution models , 2012 .

[34]  F. Schurr,et al.  Forecasting species ranges by statistical estimation of ecological niches and spatial population dynamics , 2012 .

[35]  R. Butlin,et al.  Evidence for evolutionary change associated with the recent range expansion of the British butterfly, Aricia agestis, in response to climate change , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[36]  C. Harley Climate Change, Keystone Predation, and Biodiversity Loss , 2011, Science.

[37]  Louis J. Gross,et al.  The limits to prediction in ecological systems , 2011 .

[38]  D. Sax,et al.  Analysis of climate paths reveals potential limitations on species range shifts. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[39]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  Do species' traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? , 2011, Ecology letters.

[40]  J. Kattge,et al.  Improving assessment and modelling of climate change impacts on global terrestrial biodiversity. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Climate change and evolutionary adaptation , 2011, Nature.

[42]  J. Hellmann,et al.  Adaptation to host plants may prevent rapid insect responses to climate change , 2010 .

[43]  Fiona J. Thomson,et al.  Chasing the unknown: predicting seed dispersal mechanisms from plant traits , 2010 .

[44]  M. Angilletta,et al.  Can mechanism inform species' distribution models? , 2010, Ecology letters.

[45]  Robert D Holt,et al.  A framework for community interactions under climate change. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  M. Massot,et al.  Erosion of Lizard Diversity by Climate Change and Altered Thermal Niches , 2010, Science.

[47]  Patrick J. McIntyre,et al.  Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits , 2009 .

[48]  S. Ritchie,et al.  Integrating biophysical models and evolutionary theory to predict climatic impacts on species’ ranges: the dengue mosquito Aedes aegypti in Australia , 2009 .

[49]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[50]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Demographic models and IPCC climate projections predict the decline of an emperor penguin population , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  M. Angilletta Thermal Adaptation: A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis , 2009 .

[52]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. , 2008, Ecology.

[54]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models , 2008, Biology Letters.

[55]  M. Kearney,et al.  Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates , 2008 .

[56]  R. McCleery,et al.  Adaptive Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Climate Change in a Wild Bird Population , 2008, Science.

[57]  S. Sim,et al.  Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  John E. Kutzbach,et al.  Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. , 2007 .

[60]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolutionary Response to Rapid Climate Change , 2006, Science.

[62]  Greg Dwyer,et al.  Combining Population‐Dynamic and Ecophysiological Models to Predict Climate‐Induced Insect Range Shifts , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[63]  H. Pulliam On the relationship between niche and distribution , 2000 .

[64]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  Robust Strategies for Abating Climate Change , 2000 .

[65]  B. Sæther,et al.  AVIAN LIFE HISTORY VARIATION AND CONTRIBUTION OF DEMOGRAPHIC TRAITS TO THE POPULATION GROWTH RATE , 2000 .

[66]  Jeff P. Reeve,et al.  Predicting long-term response to selection. , 2000, Genetical research.

[67]  Marcel E. Visser,et al.  Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[68]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.