Integrating olive grove maintenance and energy biomass recovery with a single-pass pruning and harvesting machine.

Abstract In Italy, olive tree groves may offer up to a million tonnes of dry biomass per year as pruning residue. Searching for a cost-effective way to tap this potential, the authors tested a new machine, capable of recovering pruning residue at the same time as pruning. The pre-commercial prototype was tested on four different plots and compared to a simpler tractor-base mechanical pruning unit. The authors conducted detailed time-studies in order to determine machine productivity and residue recovery cost. The integrated machine can treat between 0.2 and 0.6 ha h −1 , producing between 0.33 and 1.03 tonnes of fresh residue hour −1 . Its integrated residue recovery function does not slow the pruning, which actually proceeds faster than with the tractor-base unit, due to the more efficient multiple-disc cutting bar. The marginal cost of residue recovery hovers around 40–45 € fresh tonne −1 . However, the new machine must not be considered just as a biomass harvester, but rather as a mechanical pruning unit with an integrated biomass recovery function. Its main benefit derives from the capacity of performing a very effective mechanical pruning, and the residue recovery function is a secondary benefit yet unavailable on standard pruning machines. Its deployment must be seen in the context of a general effort to modernize olive grove management and to develop an integrated biomass production system, rather than as a further attempt to build a specialised biomass supply chain.

[1]  C. Di Blasi,et al.  A study on the production of agricultural residues in Italy. , 1997 .

[2]  Li Lu,et al.  The role of marginal agricultural land-based mulberry planting in biomass energy production , 2009 .

[3]  Eldon D. Olsen,et al.  STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF METHODS USED IN HARVESTING WORK STUDIES , 1998 .

[4]  Roberto Fratini,et al.  A methodology to anaylse the potential development of biomass-energy sector: an application in Tuscany , 2004 .

[5]  Edwin S. Miyata,et al.  Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. , 1980 .

[6]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Multifunctional biomass production systems –an overview with presentation of specific applications in India and Sweden , 2008 .

[7]  Enrico Cini,et al.  New shredding machine for recycling pruning residuals , 2009 .

[8]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Testing Mobile Chippers for Chip Size Distribution , 2005 .

[9]  A. Asikainen,et al.  Comminution of Logging Residues with Evolution 910R chipper, MOHA chipper truck, and Morbark 1200 tub grinder , 2013 .

[10]  J. R. Hess,et al.  Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production , 2007 .

[11]  Juha Nurmi,et al.  The storage of logging residue for fuel , 1999 .

[12]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Industrial harvesting of olive tree pruning residue for energy biomass. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[13]  Borja Velázquez-Martí,et al.  Analysis of the process of biomass harvesting with collecting- chippers fed by pick up headers in plantations of olive trees , 2009 .

[14]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations , 2009 .

[15]  Giovanni Molari,et al.  Dynamic analysis of reciprocating single-blade cutter bars , 2007 .

[16]  Rien Visser,et al.  Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. , 2009 .

[17]  Bengt Hillring Incentives for co-firing in bio-fuelled industrial steam, heat and power production—Swedish experiences , 2003 .

[18]  Jan Erik Mattsson,et al.  Tendency of wood fuels from whole trees, logging residues and roundwood to bridge over openings , 2004 .