Prostate cancer and social media

The use of social media is increasing globally and is employed in a variety of ways in the prostate cancer community. In addition to their use in research, advocacy, and awareness campaigns, social media offer vast opportunities for education and networking for patients with prostate cancer and health-care professionals, and many educational resources and support networks are available to patients with prostate cancer and their caregivers. Despite the considerable potential for social media to be employed in the field of prostate cancer, concerns remain — particularly regarding the maintenance of patient confidentiality, variable information quality, and possible financial conflicts of interest. A number of professional societies have, therefore, issued guidance regarding social media use in medicine. Social media are used extensively in other cancer communities, particularly among patients with breast cancer, and both the quantity and type of information available are expected to grow in the future.Key pointsSocial media are employed in various ways in the prostate cancer community, including research, advocacy, education, networking for patients and health-care professionals, and support for patients and their caregivers.Although the use of social media, especially Twitter, in the prostate cancer community has been steadily increasing, it still lags behind the use in other cancers, especially breast cancer.Most major medical meetings now have their own hashtag, and standardized hashtags have also been created for particular disease states through the Urology Tag Ontology Project.Online journal clubs hosted on Twitter enable real-time discussion of new research and sharing of information and experiences regardless of geographical location and time zone.A number of concerns remain regarding social media use, particularly around maintenance of patient confidentiality, variable information quality, and possible financial conflicts of interest.Some institutions or departments have specific restrictions or policies on social media to encourage professional and appropriate use, and guidelines for proper use of social media have been produced by professional societies including the American Urological Association and European Association of Urology.Social media offer varied opportunities for education and networking for patients with prostate cancer and health-care professionals, as well as potential uses in research, advocacy, and awareness campaigns. In this Review, leaders in the field discuss social media in prostate cancer and consider the obstacles and potential for their use in the future.

[1]  Laurie Hoffman-Goetz,et al.  Social Media and Men’s Health: A Content Analysis of Twitter Conversations During the 2013 Movember Campaigns in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom , 2017, American journal of men's health.

[2]  Robert S. Miller,et al.  Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice. , 2012, Journal of oncology practice.

[3]  Johannes Huber,et al.  New Media for Educating Urology Residents: An Interview Study in Canada and Germany. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[4]  Mitchell H. Tsai,et al.  The use of Twitter to facilitate sharing of clinical expertise in urology , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  R. Manecksha,et al.  Newsworthiness vs scientific impact: are the most highly cited urology papers the most widely disseminated in the media? , 2017, BJU international.

[6]  P. F. Anderson,et al.  Disease-Specific Hashtags for Online Communication About Cancer Care. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[7]  T. James,et al.  A pattern-matched Twitter analysis of US cancer-patient sentiments. , 2016, The Journal of surgical research.

[8]  John O'Mullane,et al.  Who's talking about breast cancer? Analysis of daily breast cancer posts on the internet. , 2013, Breast.

[9]  Christopher C. Yang,et al.  Proceedings of the 2012 International Workshop on Smart Health and Wellbeing, SHB 2012, October 29, 2012, Maui, HI, USA , 2012, SHB.

[10]  K. Koo,et al.  Unprofessional content on Facebook accounts of US urology residency graduates , 2017, BJU international.

[11]  D. Murphy,et al.  Activity, content, contributors, and influencers of the twitter discussion on urologic oncology. , 2016, Urologic oncology.

[12]  S. Boorjian,et al.  Media reporting of ProtecT: a disconnect in information dissemination? , 2017, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[13]  T. Allen,et al.  Let's Have a Tweetup: The Case for Using Twitter Professionally. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  J. Chretien US global health strategy: promoting healthy development. , 2011, JAMA.

[15]  O. Ekundayo,et al.  Barriers to Prostate Cancer Prevention and Community Recommended Health Education Strategies in an Urban African American Community in Jackson, Mississippi , 2013, Social work in public health.

[16]  Dibson D. Gondim,et al.  #InSituPathologists: how the #USCAP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology , 2017, Modern Pathology.

[17]  Alexander Kutikov,et al.  Urology Tag Ontology Project: Standardizing Social Media Communication Descriptors. , 2016, European urology.

[18]  Fan Yu,et al.  Towards large-scale twitter mining for drug-related adverse events , 2012, SHB '12.

[19]  A. Merseburger,et al.  Qualitative Twitter analysis of participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content at a major urologic conference. , 2016, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[20]  Laurie Hoffman-Goetz,et al.  Tweeting About Prostate and Testicular Cancers: What Are Individuals Saying in Their Discussions About the 2013 Movember Canada Campaign? , 2015, Journal of Cancer Education.

[21]  Corey H. Basch,et al.  A Content Analysis of YouTube™ Videos Related to Prostate Cancer , 2016, American journal of men's health.

[22]  V. Prasad,et al.  Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Hematologist-Oncologists on Twitter , 2017, JAMA internal medicine.

[23]  R. Wassersug,et al.  Knowledge of Reproductive System Cancers, Their Treatments and Side Effects , 2012, Journal of Cancer Education.

[24]  J. Catto,et al.  Social media offers unprecedented opportunities for vibrant exchange of professional ideas across continents. , 2014, European urology.

[25]  C. Seale New directions for critical internet health studies: representing cancer experience on the web. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[26]  F. Dal Moro Online Survey on Twitter: A Urological Experience , 2013, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[27]  Terry Kind,et al.  Physicians on Twitter. , 2011, JAMA.

[28]  K. Linton,et al.  Complications of prostate cancer treatment. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  Todd M Morgan,et al.  European Association of Urology (@Uroweb) recommendations on the appropriate use of social media. , 2014, European urology.

[30]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  A research framework for pharmacovigilance in health social media: Identification and evaluation of patient adverse drug event reports , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[31]  A. Rosenkrantz,et al.  Engaging and educating patients in prostate imaging via social media , 2016, Abdominal Radiology.

[32]  J. Landercasper,et al.  Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  Michael Leveridge,et al.  International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience. , 2014, European urology.

[34]  M. Rouprêt,et al.  Novel use of Twitter to disseminate and evaluate adherence to clinical guidelines by the European Association of Urology , 2017, BJU international.

[35]  E. Lerma,et al.  The Evolution of the Journal Club: From Osler to Twitter. , 2017, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[36]  J. L. Bender,et al.  Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[37]  A. Esterman,et al.  Impaired sexual function and prostate cancer: a mixed method investigation into the experiences of men and their partners. , 2013, Journal of clinical nursing.

[38]  Ted Lee,et al.  Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate‐specific antigen , 2015, BJU international.

[39]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Strategy of robotic surgeons to exert public influence through Twitter , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[40]  Pooja Sharma,et al.  WhatsApp for Teaching Pathology Postgraduates: A Pilot Study , 2017, Journal of pathology informatics.

[41]  Atsushi Hozawa,et al.  Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[42]  P. Klemm,et al.  Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. , 1999, Computers in nursing.

[43]  J. Seigne,et al.  YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. , 2010, Urology.

[44]  N. Lawrentschuk,et al.  An analysis of world media reporting of two recent large randomized prospective trials investigating screening for prostate cancer , 2011, BJU international.

[45]  P. Whitten,et al.  The Differential Effects of Social Media Sites for Promoting Cancer Risk Reduction , 2016, Journal of Cancer Education.

[46]  J. Simons Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy: Beyond Immunity to Curability , 2014, Cancer Immunology Research.

[47]  Nathan Lawrentschuk,et al.  The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings , 2015, BJU international.

[48]  Paul McCrone,et al.  The eSMART study protocol: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate electronic symptom management using the advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) remote technology for patients with cancer , 2017, BMJ Open.

[49]  The Node and beyond-using social media in cell and developmental biology. , 2017, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[50]  I. Tsaur,et al.  Novel survey disseminated through Twitter supports its utility for networking, disseminating research, advocacy, clinical practice and other professional goals. , 2015, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[51]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Engaging responsibly with social media: the BJUI guidelines , 2014, BJU international.

[52]  J. Oliffe,et al.  The social context for psychological distress from iatrogenic gynecomastia with suggestions for its management. , 2009, The journal of sexual medicine.

[53]  M. Kris,et al.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment , 2017, JAMA.

[54]  N. Stout,et al.  Tweet this: how advocacy for breast and prostate cancers stacks up on social media , 2017, BJU international.