Periosteum, bone's “smart” bounding membrane, exhibits direction‐dependent permeability

The periosteum serves as bone's bounding membrane, exhibits hallmarks of semipermeable epithelial barrier membranes, and contains mechanically sensitive progenitor cells capable of generating bone. The current paucity of data regarding the periosteum's permeability and bidirectional transport properties provided the impetus for the current study. In ovine femur and tibia samples, the periosteum's hydraulic permeability coefficient, k, was calculated using Darcy's Law and a custom‐designed permeability tester to apply controlled, volumetric flow of phosphate‐buffered saline through periosteum samples. Based on these data, ovine periosteum demonstrates mechanically responsive and directionally dependent (anisotropic) permeability properties. At baseline flow rates comparable to interstitial fluid flow (0.5 µL/s), permeability is low and does not exhibit anisotropy. In contrast, at high flow rates comparable to those prevailing during traumatic injury, femoral periosteum exhibits an order of magnitude higher permeability compared to baseline flow rates. In addition, at high flow rates permeability exhibits significant directional dependence, with permeability higher in the bone to muscle direction than vice versa. Furthermore, compared to periosteum in which the intrinsic tension (pre‐stress) is maintained, free relaxation of the tibial periosteum after resection significantly increases its permeability in both flow directions. Hence, the structure and mechanical stress state of periosteum influences its role as bone's bounding membrane. During periods of homeostasis, periosteum may serve as a barrier membrane on the outer surface of bone, allowing for equal albeit low quiescent molecular communication between tissue compartments including bone and muscle. In contrast, increases in pressure and baseline flow rates within the periosteum resulting from injury, trauma, and/or disease may result in a significant increase in periosteum permeability and consequently in increased molecular communication between tissue compartments. Elucidation of the periosteum's permeability properties is key to understanding periosteal mechanobiology in bone health and healing, as well as to elucidate periosteum structure and function as a smart biomaterial that allows bidirectional and mechanically responsive fluid transport. © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[1]  Melissa L. Knothe Tate,et al.  Whither flows the fluid in bone?" An osteocyte's perspective. , 2003 .

[2]  P J Kelly,et al.  Permeability of cortical bone of canine tibiae. , 1987, Microvascular research.

[3]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Residual periosteum tension is insufficient to directly modulate bone growth. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Gaffar Gailani,et al.  Experimental determination of the permeability in the lacunar-canalicular porosity of bone. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  D. Gross,et al.  Streaming potential and the electromechanical response of physiologically-moist bone. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Solomon R. Pollack,et al.  Streaming potentials in fluid-filled bone , 1984 .

[7]  S. Margulies,et al.  Role of stretch on tight junction structure in alveolar epithelial cells. , 2001, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[8]  Ulf Knothe,et al.  Net Change in Periosteal Strain During Stance Shift Loading After Surgery Correlates to Rapid De Novo Bone Generation in Critically Sized Defects , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  L. Lanyon,et al.  In vivo strain measurements from bone and prosthesis following total hip replacement. An experimental study in sheep. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Egleton,et al.  Molecular physiology and pathophysiology of tight junctions in the blood–brain barrier , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  C. Eriksson STREAMING POTENTIALS AND OTHER WATER‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS IN MINERALIZED TISSUES , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. D. Lynch,et al.  Occludin is a functional component of the tight junction. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[13]  J. Anderson,et al.  Molecular structure of tight junctions and their role in epithelial transport. , 2001, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[14]  Shannon R. Moore,et al.  Surgical Membranes as Directional Delivery Devices to Generate Tissue: Testing in an Ovine Critical Sized Defect Model , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Microporous biodegradable polyurethane membranes for tissue engineering , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[16]  Melissa L Knothe Tate,et al.  Multiscale mechanobiology of de novo bone generation, remodeling and adaptation of autograft in a common ovine femur model. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[17]  U. Knothe,et al.  Role of mechanical loading in healing of massive bone autografts , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  M. Brookes,et al.  Blood Supply of Bone: Scientific Aspects , 1998 .

[19]  R Huiskes,et al.  The role of computational models in the search for the mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of articular cartilage. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  I. Mccarthy,et al.  The acute vascular response to intramedullary reaming. Microsphere estimation of blood flow in the intact ovine tibia. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  Eric J Anderson,et al.  Bone as an inspiration for a novel class of mechanoactive materials. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[22]  C. Rubin,et al.  Fluid pressure gradients, arising from oscillations in intramedullary pressure, is correlated with the formation of bone and inhibition of intracortical porosity. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  S. Margulies,et al.  Differential effects of claudin-3 and claudin-4 on alveolar epithelial barrier function. , 2011, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[24]  B. Annexure DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION , 2002 .

[25]  Matthew R Allen,et al.  Human femoral neck has less cellular periosteum, and more mineralized periosteum, than femoral diaphyseal bone. , 2005, Bone.

[26]  W M Lai,et al.  Effects of nonlinear strain-dependent permeability and rate of compression on the stress behavior of articular cartilage. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  R. D. Lynch,et al.  Knockdown of occludin expression leads to diverse phenotypic alterations in epithelial cells. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[28]  R. T. Hart,et al.  Effects of extensive circumferential periosteal stripping on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the murine femoral cortex , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[29]  I. Hidalgo,et al.  Evaluation of the MDR-MDCK cell line as a permeability screen for the blood-brain barrier. , 2005, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[30]  Melissa L Knothe Tate,et al.  "Whither flows the fluid in bone?" An osteocyte's perspective. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  S. Milz,et al.  Multiscale computational and experimental approaches to elucidate bone and ligament mechanobiology using the ulna-radius-interosseous membrane construct as a model system. , 2012, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[32]  Ibsen Bellini Coimbra,et al.  Periosteum as a source of mesenchymal stem cells: the effects of TGF-β3 on chondrogenesis , 2011, Clinics.

[33]  S. Naili,et al.  On the paradoxical determinations of the lacuno-canalicular permeability of bone , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[34]  M. K. Knothe Tate,et al.  Probing the tissue to subcellular level structure underlying bone's molecular sieving function. , 2003, Biorheology.

[35]  Jeffrey A Weiss,et al.  Permeability of human medial collateral ligament in compression transverse to the collagen fiber direction. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Melissa L Knothe Tate,et al.  Solid-supported lipid bilayers to drive stem cell fate and tissue architecture using periosteum derived progenitor cells. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[37]  Walter Herzog,et al.  On the anisotropy and inhomogeneity of permeability in articular cartilage , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[38]  M. K. Knothe Tate,et al.  Effects of mechanical loading patterns, bone graft, and proximity to periosteum on bone defect healing. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  Erich Schneider,et al.  Testing of a new one-stage bone-transport surgical procedure exploiting the periosteum for the repair of long-bone defects. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  Matthew R Allen,et al.  Periosteum: biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. , 2004, Bone.

[41]  Stephen C Cowin,et al.  Estimation of bone permeability using accurate microstructural measurements. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  B. Scribner,et al.  Bi-directional permeability of the human peritoneum to middle molecules. , 1973, Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association.

[43]  W M Lai,et al.  Drag-induced compression of articular cartilage during a permeation experiment. , 1980, Biorheology.

[44]  Hana Chang,et al.  Concise Review: The Periosteum: Tapping into a Reservoir of Clinically Useful Progenitor Cells , 2012, Stem cells translational medicine.

[45]  Eric J. Anderson,et al.  Pairing computational and scaled physical models to determine permeability as a measure of cellular communication in micro- and nano-scale pericellular spaces , 2008 .

[46]  V. Agol,et al.  Bidirectional Increase in Permeability of Nuclear Envelope upon Poliovirus Infection and Accompanying Alterations of Nuclear Pores , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[47]  N. Depaola,et al.  Spatial variations in endothelial barrier function in disturbed flows in vitro. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[48]  Melissa L. Knothe Tate Smart body armor inspired by flow in bone , 2011 .

[49]  Christopher R Jacobs,et al.  The periosteum as a cellular source for functional tissue engineering. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[50]  R. Midura,et al.  Lipids and Collagen Matrix Restrict the Hydraulic Permeability Within the Porous Compartment of Adult Cortical Bone , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[51]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Collagen orientation in periosteum and perichondrium is aligned with preferential directions of tissue growth , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[52]  Sarah H. McBride,et al.  Anisotropic mechanical properties of ovine femoral periosteum and the effects of cryopreservation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[53]  Yoshitaka Kameo,et al.  Estimation of bone permeability considering the morphology of lacuno-canalicular porosity. , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[54]  Joseph D. Gardinier,et al.  In situ permeability measurement of the mammalian lacunar-canalicular system. , 2010, Bone.

[55]  E. Rodríguez‐Merchán Pediatric skeletal trauma: a review and historical perspective. , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.