Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments.

Children 5 and 9 years of age and adults were required to identify the final words of low- and high-context sentences in background noise. Age-related differences in the audibility of speech signals were minimized by selecting signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) that yielded 78% correct performance for low-context sentences. As expected, children required more favorable SNRs than adults to achieve comparable levels of performance. A more difficult listening condition was generated by adding 2 dB of noise. In general, 5-year-olds performed more poorly than did 9-year-olds and adults. Listeners of all ages, however, showed comparable gains from context in both levels of noise, indicating that noise does not impede children's use of contextual cues.

[1]  Ellen Winner,et al.  The Point Of Words: Children's Understanding Of Metaphor And Irony , 1990 .

[2]  B. Morrongiello,et al.  Auditory sensitivity in preschool children. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L. L. Elliott Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  F Grosjean,et al.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  E. Bates,et al.  Single-word shadowing and the study of lexical access , 1997, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[7]  S. Trehub,et al.  Children's understanding of emotion in speech. , 2001, Child development.

[8]  J H Mills,et al.  Noise and children: a review of literature. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A R Horwitz,et al.  Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D B Pisoni,et al.  The effect of talker variability on word recognition in preschool children. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[11]  D. Geffner,et al.  Evaluation of auditory discrimination in children with ADD and without ADD , 1996, Child psychiatry and human development.

[12]  Tricia B. K. Chirillo,et al.  Effects of word predictability, child development, and aging on time-gated speech recognition performance. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  P. Lieberman Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[15]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Cole,et al.  Listening for mispronunciations in a children's story: The use of context by children and adults , 1980 .

[17]  Robert C. Bilger,et al.  Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .

[18]  A. Walley Spoken word recognition by young children and adults , 1988 .

[19]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Amanda C. Walley,et al.  The Role of Vocabulary Development in Children′s Spoken Word Recognition and Segmentation Ability , 1993 .

[21]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Children's processing of spoken language , 1981 .

[22]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  L L Elliott,et al.  Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  B A Schneider,et al.  Developmental changes in masked thresholds. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Daneman,et al.  Listening to discourse in distracting settings: the effects of aging. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[26]  F. Cirrin,et al.  Lexical Search Speed in Children and Adults. , 1984 .

[27]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[28]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  S. Trehub,et al.  Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  F. Grosjean The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  C. Fowler Differential Shortening of Repeated Content Words Produced in Various Communicative Contexts , 1988, Language and speech.

[32]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.