Social impact in technologically-mediated communication: An examination of online influence

This study used Social Impact Theory to explore sources and functions of interpersonal influence in Computer-Mediated Communication. Participants were 43 female and 17 male graduate students ranging from 25 to 60 years of age. In each of five distinct graduate classes (n"1=15, n"2=11, n"3=10, n"4=12, n"5=12) delivered online at a research university, participants engaged in anonymous and computer-mediated discourse and then nominated peers who were directive and/or influential (positive and negative) during the online interaction. High numbers of peer nominations were expected to characterize participants perceived as emanating social impact. Four interpersonal factors were chosen as strength operants in accordance with Social Impact Theory and were, therefore, expected to predict social impact. Of the four, assertiveness and exaggeration were significant, while emotional intensity and sensitivity were not. Two factors, contribution total and word total, were chosen as immediacy operants in accordance with Social Impact Theory. Both factors were found to be significant predictors of social impact. Implications of these findings relative to online learning and interpersonal influence as it occurs in an online context are discussed.

[1]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[2]  Debora Spar,et al.  Ruling Commerce in the Networld , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. , 1987 .

[4]  Eun-Ju Lee.  Effects of Visual Representation on Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Tests of the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects. , 2004 .

[5]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[7]  Bibb Latané,et al.  All alone in front of all those people: Stage fright as a function of number and type of co-performers and audience. , 1981 .

[8]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. , 1985 .

[9]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Strength and Number of Solicitors and the Urge toward Altruism , 1981 .

[10]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[11]  Don C. Locke,et al.  Communication Stereotypes , 1993 .

[12]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions , 1984 .

[13]  Robert W. McChesney,et al.  The Internet and U. S. Communication Policy-Making in Historical and Critical Perspective , 1996 .

[14]  Steven G. Jones.  Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety , 1997 .

[15]  K. Sassenberg.  Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. , 2002 .

[16]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading groups in organizations , 1986 .

[17]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[18]  S. Kiesler.  The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[19]  George McMurdo,et al.  Electric writing Changing contexts of communication , 2006 .

[20]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[21]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  The handbook of group communication theory & research , 1999 .

[22]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[24]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Internet use in the contemporary media environment. , 2001 .

[25]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Stereotypes of Males' and Females' Speech , 1976 .

[26]  Sabine Kowal,et al.  Allocation of time in reading aloud: Being fluent is not the same as being rhetorical , 1989 .

[27]  C. Cryss Brunner.  Can Power Support an "Ethic of Care"? An Examination of the Professional Practices of Women Superintendents. , 1998 .

[28]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[29]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[30]  Harriett von Krais Porter,et al.  Studies in the Psychology of Stuttering, XIV: Stuttering Phenomena in Relation to Size and Personnel of Audience1This study was directed by Wendell Johnson at the University of Iowa. , 1939 .

[31]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[32]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Diffusion of Responsibility and Restaurant Tipping: Cheaper by the Bunch , 1975 .

[33]  Shu-Fang Lin,et al.  Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction Revisited: A Comparison of Participant–Observer Perspectives , 2007 .

[34]  J. Wolpe,et al.  Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition , 1958, Conditional reflex.

[35]  N. Noddings.  Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education , 1984 .

[36]  P. Goodman.  Designing effective work groups , 1999 .

[37]  N. Noddings.  The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education , 1992 .

[38]  Kevin MacDonald,et al.  Warmth as a Developmental Construct: An Evolutionary Analysis , 1992 .

[39]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. , 1997 .

[40]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[41]  Jean A. Dobos.  Gratification Models of Satisfaction and Choice of Communication Channels in Organizations , 1992 .

[42]  Kerry K. Osborne,et al.  Virtual community in a telepresence environment , 1997 .

[43]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[44]  C. C. Brunner,et al.  Disrupting identity: Fertile soil for raising social consciousness in educational leaders: Making revolutions in education , 2006 .

[45]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Social Comparison in Everyday Life , 1992 .

[46]  David Jacobson,et al.  Impression Formation in Cyberspace: Online Expectations and Offline Experiences in Text-based Virtual Communities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Studying Online Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[48]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[50]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[51]  J. R. Wilcox,et al.  Attitudes toward Male and Female Speech: Experiments on the Effects of Sex-Typical Language. , 1980 .

[52]  N. Epley,et al.  Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Patricia Jakubowski-Spector,et al.  Facilitating the Growth of Women Through Assertive Training , 1973 .

[54]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[55]  Steven G. Jones.  CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community , 1994 .

[56]  Margaret McLaughlin.  The Art Site on the World Wide Web , 1996 .

[57]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Gender and Speech Rate in the Perception of Competence and Social Attractiveness , 2001, The Journal of social psychology.

[58]  J. Cappella,et al.  Talk and Silence Sequences in Informal Conversations III: Interspeaker Influence , 1981 .

[59]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[60]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[61]  Martin Lea,et al.  Contexts of computer-mediated communication , 1992 .

[62]  R. Larsen,et al.  Intensity and frequency: dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 1989 .

[64]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[65]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  Communication and social influence processes , 1998 .

[66]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[67]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Computer-Mediated Group Work: The Interaction of Sex and Anonymity , 2002, Commun. Res..

[68]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Mass Media Use and Social Life Among Internet Users , 2000 .

[69]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[70]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[71]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[72]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[73]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  Testing Claims for On-Line Conferences , 1991 .

[74]  Carole Edelsky,et al.  Subjective Reactions to Sex-Linked Language , 1976 .

[75]  N. Miller,et al.  Speed of speech and persuasion. , 1976 .

[76]  Michele H. Jackson.  Assessing the Structure of Communication on the World Wide Web , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[77]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Rhythms of dialogue , 1970 .

[79]  Linda A. Jackson,et al.  Stereotype effects of attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. , 1993 .

[80]  Ed Diener,et al.  Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. , 1986 .

[81]  C. Cryss Brunner,et al.  A Proposition for the Reconception of the Superintendency: Reconsidering Traditional and Nontraditional Discourse , 2002 .

[82]  Mark T. Palmer,et al.  Topics, turns, and interpersonal control using serial judgment methods , 1993 .

[83]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[84]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The spotlight effect in social judgment: an egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  Elaine L. Wilmore,et al.  The New Century: Is It Too Late for Transformational Leadership?. , 2001 .

[86]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[87]  Edward L. Fink,et al.  Dynamic Social Impact Theory and the Study of Human Communication , 1996 .

[88]  R. Spears,et al.  Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication , 1992 .

[89]  Linda F. Alwitt,et al.  Effects of Time Compression on Attitudes and Information Processing , 1983 .

[90]  B. Latané,et al.  Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. , 1996 .

[91]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[92]  T. Postmes,et al.  Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality? , 2002 .

[93]  R. Lakoff.  Language and woman's place , 1973, Language in Society.

[94]  T. Connolly,et al.  Toward Atheory of Automated Group Work , 1990 .

[95]  S. Gramling,et al.  Personal Assertiveness and the Effects of Social Support among College Students. , 1990 .

[96]  R. Kraut,et al.  Using E-mail for Personal Relationships , 2001 .

[97]  Kevin MacDonald,et al.  Early experience, relative plasticity, and social development , 1985 .

[98]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[99]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article , 1986 .

[100]  T. T. Postmes,et al.  Refining the cognitive redefinition of the group: Deindividuation effects in common bond vs. common identity groups. , 2000 .

[101]  Tom Postmes,et al.  SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups. , 2000 .

[102]  A. Dittmann.  Developmental Factors in Conversational Behavior , 1972 .

[103]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[104]  N. Triplett,et al.  The Dynamogenic Factors in Pacemaking and Competition , 1898 .

[105]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Population and political participation: A social impact analysis of voter responsibility. , 1998 .

[106]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Effects of gendered character representation on person perception and informational social influence in computer-mediated communication , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[107]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Could the Internet Balkanize Science? , 1996, Science.

[108]  R. Larsen,et al.  Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review , 1987 .

[109]  James Ho,et al.  Evaluating the World Wide Web: A Global Study of Commercial Sites , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[110]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Character-Based Team Identification and Referent Informational Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2007 .

[111]  William R. Elliott,et al.  Similarities in patterns of media use: A cluster analysis of media gratifications , 1979 .

[112]  Shirley S. Ho,et al.  Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2008, Commun. Res..

[113]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[114]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[115]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .